Re: [users@httpd] Syntax checking an alternate configuration file

2016-07-06 Thread Rich Bowen
On 07/06/2016 12:17 PM, Darryl Philip Baker wrote: > I want to syntax check an alternate configuration file in Apache 2.4 but > I have hit a snag, “apachectl –t –f {full path name}” and “apachectl –f > {full path name} configtest” give me an extra message which I don’t need > and don’t want to se

Re: [users@httpd] Syntax checking an alternate configuration file

2016-07-06 Thread Yehuda Katz
That is a change RedHat made to the script - it isn't in the regular distribution. RedHat explicitly discourages using a non-default-location configuration file. Ref: https://access.redhat.com/discussions/1605003 - Y On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Darryl Philip Baker < darryl.ba...@northwester

[users@httpd] Syntax checking an alternate configuration file

2016-07-06 Thread Darryl Philip Baker
I want to syntax check an alternate configuration file in Apache 2.4 but I have hit a snag, "apachectl -t -f {full path name}" and "apachectl -f {full path name} configtest" give me an extra message which I don't need and don't want to see. I looked at the shell script that is apachectl and it l