Re: [users@httpd] Response code 408

2012-07-09 Thread John Iliffe
This is an update in this problem and a thank you to Daniel. I have been playing with the sub-parameters to the RequestReadTimeout parameter in periods of a couple of days. What I have found is: 1. 408's tend to cluster on particular IP addresses 2. the IP getting the most 408's will come an

Re: [users@httpd] Response code 408

2012-06-04 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 6/4/2012 3:13 PM, John Iliffe wrote: > 1) since almost all of these 408's are METHOD=GET why is the request not > present as soon as the initial connection arrives since the request is > coded in the URL and not in a separate header? The total (URL + request) > length is about 80 bytes or le

[users@httpd] Response code 408

2012-06-04 Thread John Iliffe
This is a re-post; I didn't get an answer so I guess I didn't phrase the original question very well. We are getting a lot (about 2% of GET's) of response code 408. The config file has: RequestReadTimeout header=10 body=30 Originally I didn't spot this requirement and requests were timing out

Re: [users@httpd] Response code 408

2012-05-21 Thread John Iliffe
Looked OK at the beginning but after 3 days in use this solution seems to have made things worse. The number of 408 responses has gone up fast and I don't know why. As suggested I added the following line: RequestReadTimeout header=10 body=30 with the example timeouts taken from the Apache d

Re: [users@httpd] Response code 408

2012-05-20 Thread John Iliffe
On Tuesday 15 May 2012 14:29:56 Jeroen Geilman wrote: > On 05/11/2012 06:01 PM, John Iliffe wrote: > > I recently switched from Apache-2.2.14 to Apache-2.4.2. In the entire > > time we ran 2.2.14 I don't recall seeing a response code 408. Since > > we switched two weeks ago we average about 30 -

Re: [users@httpd] Response code 408

2012-05-15 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 05/11/2012 06:01 PM, John Iliffe wrote: I recently switched from Apache-2.2.14 to Apache-2.4.2. In the entire time we ran 2.2.14 I don't recall seeing a response code 408. Since we switched two weeks ago we average about 30 - 35 a day. Our server is not heavily loaded. The RFC definition o

[users@httpd] Response code 408

2012-05-11 Thread John Iliffe
I recently switched from Apache-2.2.14 to Apache-2.4.2. In the entire time we ran 2.2.14 I don't recall seeing a response code 408. Since we switched two weeks ago we average about 30 - 35 a day. Our server is not heavily loaded. The RFC definition of response code 408 is "Request Timeout, t