Re: [users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 ops

2023-02-23 Thread Uncle Gary
Getting closer:  "  Apache service is already started. " Can you explain the operation of the " Service Monitor ? "   " Connect ? "  I'll RTFM if documented. Thanks much ! On 2/22/2023 8:21 PM, 😉 Good Guy 😉 wrote: > On 22/02/2023 16:31, Uncle Gary wrote: >> Possible additional problem: >> >>

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 ops

2023-02-22 Thread 😉 Good Guy 😉
On 22/02/2023 16:31, Uncle Gary wrote: Possible additional problem: Noticed that the 2.4 " Service " is stopped and will not start. "Â Windows could not start " etc etc. The full command to install a service is: httpd -k install Good luck.

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 ops

2023-02-22 Thread 😉 Good Guy 😉
On 22/02/2023 16:31, Uncle Gary wrote: Possible additional problem: Noticed that the 2.4 " Service " is stopped and will not start. "Â Windows could not start " etc etc. How exactly are you trying to start "service"?  Dis you install httpd as a service by typing: httpd -k You need to

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 ops

2023-02-22 Thread Uncle Gary
Possible additional problem: Noticed that the 2.4 " Service " is stopped and will not start. "  Windows could not start " etc etc. On 2/21/2023 4:54 PM, 😉 Good Guy 😉 wrote: > On 21/02/2023 19:54, Uncle Gary wrote: >> Ok guys, this should be very easy: >> >> I've gotten to " /It works /" >> >

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 ops

2023-02-21 Thread Uncle Gary
OKthat may be my mistake. Tnx much GGI'lll try it ! G On 2/21/2023 5:58 PM, 😉 Good Guy 😉 wrote: > On 21/02/2023 23:17, Uncle Gary wrote: >> OK GuyI'm certain that's the first line I edited, but I'll go back >> and try again ! >> >> Many thanks ! >> >> Gary >> >> >> > > After making t

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 ops

2023-02-21 Thread 😉 Good Guy 😉
On 21/02/2023 23:17, Uncle Gary wrote: OK GuyI'm certain that's the first line I edited, but I'll go back and try again ! Many thanks ! Gary After making the changes, you need to restart Apache so that changes can take effect.

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 ops

2023-02-21 Thread Uncle Gary
OK GuyI'm certain that's the first line I edited, but I'll go back and try again ! Many thanks ! Gary On 2/21/2023 4:54 PM, 😉 Good Guy 😉 wrote: > On 21/02/2023 19:54, Uncle Gary wrote: >> Ok guys, this should be very easy: >> >> I've gotten to " /It works /" >> >> Now, to edit the locatio

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 ops

2023-02-21 Thread 😉 Good Guy 😉
On 21/02/2023 19:54, Uncle Gary wrote: Ok guys, this should be very easy: I've gotten to " /It works /" Now, to edit the location to point to the files I need accessible on a Win10 Pro host. The location is:    E:\Logs    (  Folders under  ) No matter what I change, it remains "  It works !

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 and DirectoryIndex and htaccess

2018-06-14 Thread LuKreme
On Jun 13, 2018, at 11:50, Frank Gingras wrote: > > That isn't the relevant error from the error log. We need that entry to help > you. That is the ONLY thing logged in the error log. > A 403 as such is always logged in the error log, perhaps with the exception > of cases when you use a Rewri

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 and DirectoryIndex and htaccess

2018-06-13 Thread Frank Gingras
That isn't the relevant error from the error log. We need that entry to help you. A 403 as such is always logged in the error log, perhaps with the exception of cases when you use a RewriteRule with [F], or a third-party module to limit access. On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 1:37 PM @lbutlr wrote: > O

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 and DirectoryIndex and htaccess

2018-06-13 Thread @lbutlr
On 13 Jun 2018, at 11:25, Frank Gingras wrote: > What does the error log say, exactly? From the original message: > The only thing in the http-error.log is: > > [Mon Jun 11 12:26:28.390150 2018] [ssl:info] [pid 34433] [client > xx.xx.xx.xx:56493] AH01964: Connection to child 9 established … >

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 and DirectoryIndex and htaccess

2018-06-13 Thread Frank Gingras
What does the error log say, exactly? On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 1:20 PM @lbutlr wrote: > No ideas? > > On 11 Jun 2018, at 12:34, @lbutlr wrote: > > I can access the files directly, but if I access the folder, I get a > permission error. > > > >

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 and DirectoryIndex and htaccess

2018-06-13 Thread @lbutlr
No ideas? On 11 Jun 2018, at 12:34, @lbutlr wrote: > I can access the files directly, but if I access the folder, I get a > permission error. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional command

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4: Users autenthication in Active Directory

2018-05-22 Thread Christophe Jaillet
Le 22/05/2018 à 21:53, Christophe Jaillet a écrit : Le 22/05/2018 à 14:14, aguayo33 a écrit :   Hi! Thanks in advance!   I need help with Apache configuration to enable login through Active directory.   I want allow login if a user is member of a group contained in other group.   Now I have t

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4: Users autenthication in Active Directory

2018-05-22 Thread Christophe Jaillet
Le 22/05/2018 à 14:14, aguayo33 a écrit : Hi! Thanks in advance! I need help with Apache configuration to enable login through Active directory. I want allow login if a user is member of a group contained in other group. Now I have this: Alias /nagios /opt/nagios/share Op

Re: [users@httpd] RE: Apache 2.4 worker mpm memory climbing no new processes

2018-01-09 Thread Campbell, Lance
Thanks, That makes a lot of sense. You explained that very well. Lance From: "Houser, Rick" Reply-To: "users@httpd.apache.org" Date: Tuesday, January 9, 2018 at 11:45 AM To: "users@httpd.apache.org" Subject: [users@httpd] RE: Apache 2.4 worker mpm memory climb

[users@httpd] RE: Apache 2.4 worker mpm memory climbing no new processes

2018-01-09 Thread Houser, Rick
This is from memory many years ago, so minor details might be off: If you have requests that take different amounts of memory to handle, the larger requests will in turn bump up the memory used by a thread pool, while releasing that memory pack to the thread pool when the request finishes. Req

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4: SSL handshake not working correct for WebSockets?

2017-12-05 Thread Markus Gausling
​I looked a little bit deeper into this and found that this looks like a missing implementation in mod_proxy_wstunnel. The proxy_wstunnel_handler() (in modules/proxy/mod_proxy_wstunnel.c) does not set the "proxy-request-hostname" when it creates the connection to the backend. When the TLS handshak

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 Mod Speling

2017-02-28 Thread Sweeny, Theo (Chief Customer Office)
Hi - I did some further digging around on Mod Speling and came across this forum - https://www.drupal.org/node/268561 It suggests that if Mod Rewrite is enabled alongside Mod Speling that there will be a conflict, resulting in Mod Speling not working. Can anyone confirm if this is the case? Th

[users@httpd] Re: apache 2.4 core dump on launch, no error logging

2016-11-17 Thread @lbutlr
On Nov 17, 2016, at 8:44 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > If there is an old openSSL lurking somewhere, I cannot find it. I have 1.0.2j > installed and working with dovecot/postfix. > > Scouring around I did find a directory > > /usr/local/lib/php/20100525/ > > which I’ve now moved aside. Rebuilding php

[users@httpd] Re: apache 2.4 core dump on launch, no error logging

2016-11-17 Thread @lbutlr
On Nov 17, 2016, at 2:39 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 08:08 -0700, @lbutlr wrote: >> On Nov 17, 2016, at 3:56 AM, Nick Kew wrote: >>> On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 12:12 -0700, @lbutlr wrote: When launching apache 2.4 I get a core dump. Nothing is logged to the http-error log. I

Re: [users@httpd] Re: apache 2.4 core dump on launch, no error logging

2016-11-17 Thread Nick Kew
On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 08:08 -0700, @lbutlr wrote: > On Nov 17, 2016, at 3:56 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 12:12 -0700, @lbutlr wrote: > >> When launching apache 2.4 I get a core dump. Nothing is logged to the > >> http-error log. I’ve tried rebuilding it to no avail. Ideas? > >>

[users@httpd] Re: apache 2.4 core dump on launch, no error logging

2016-11-17 Thread @lbutlr
On Nov 17, 2016, at 9:15 AM, Rainer Canavan wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:08 PM, @lbutlr wrote: >> On Nov 17, 2016, at 3:56 AM, Nick Kew wrote: >>> On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 12:12 -0700, @lbutlr wrote: When launching apache 2.4 I get a core dump. Nothing is logged to the http-error l

[users@httpd] Re: apache 2.4 core dump on launch, no error logging

2016-11-17 Thread @lbutlr
On Nov 17, 2016, at 8:08 AM, @lbutlr wrote: > PCRE-8.39 is installed. I’m not sure how to tell if http is trying to access > a different version. # apachectl -M Loaded Modules: core_module (static) so_module (static) http_module (static) mpm_prefork_module (static) authn_file_module (share

Re: [users@httpd] Re: apache 2.4 core dump on launch, no error logging

2016-11-17 Thread Rainer Canavan
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:08 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > On Nov 17, 2016, at 3:56 AM, Nick Kew wrote: >> On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 12:12 -0700, @lbutlr wrote: >>> When launching apache 2.4 I get a core dump. Nothing is logged to the >>> http-error log. I’ve tried rebuilding it to no avail. Ideas? >>> >> At

[users@httpd] Re: apache 2.4 core dump on launch, no error logging

2016-11-17 Thread @lbutlr
On Nov 17, 2016, at 3:56 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 12:12 -0700, @lbutlr wrote: >> When launching apache 2.4 I get a core dump. Nothing is logged to the >> http-error log. I’ve tried rebuilding it to no avail. Ideas? >> > At the top of your coredump is libpcre. Could it be that

Re: [users@httpd] Re: apache 2.4 directory autoindex corrupted

2015-10-27 Thread Jan Schaumann
Kurtis Rader wrote: > My first guess is that you've enabled memory-mapping of content. See the > EnableMMAP directive: > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/core.html#enablemmap Correct. And turning that off does avoid sending the null bytes, but the problem remains in that apache still t

Re: [users@httpd] Re: apache 2.4 directory autoindex corrupted

2015-10-26 Thread Kurtis Rader
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Jan Schaumann wrote: > Jan Schaumann wrote: > > > I just upgraded apache 2.2 to apache 2.4. After the upgrade, my > > autoindex directory listings show up as corrupted strings (see > > https://www.netmeister.org/t/ for an example). All other content > > serving

[users@httpd] Re: apache 2.4 directory autoindex corrupted

2015-10-26 Thread Jan Schaumann
Jan Schaumann wrote: > I just upgraded apache 2.2 to apache 2.4. After the upgrade, my > autoindex directory listings show up as corrupted strings (see > https://www.netmeister.org/t/ for an example). All other content > serving appears to work fine. It turns out I was wrong. All other conte

[users@httpd] RE: Apache 2.4 Problems

2015-01-17 Thread Chris Arnold
>Apache 2.4 on sles 12. I understand this version is way >different from 2.2 >but I can't get 2.4 to even listen on 80 or >443. Can anyone help me with >this? The logs only shows >me when I start and stop Apache. Btw, I am using >>apache2ctl stop/start as rcapache2 doesn't seem to >stop/start an

Re: [users@httpd] Re: apache 2.4 enable SSL for simple VirtualHost *:8843

2014-12-17 Thread Daniel
"simple configuration you say"? I would certainly try to simplify it much more. You have many Ifmodules and repeated directives and many directives you don't even need, as well as dated ones, so to try to make it work better start by removing all unnecessary stuff. I would simply delete ALL that

[users@httpd] Re: apache 2.4 enable SSL for simple VirtualHost *:8843

2014-12-16 Thread J Tom Moon 79
Also, the RSA key files were generated with the following command: $ sudo openssl req -x509 -nodes -days 730 -newkey "rsa:512" -subj '/C=US/ST=WA/L=Sea/O=Company Inc/OU=my-team' -keyout /etc/ssl/private/test1.cert.key -out /etc/ssl/certs/test1.cert.pem There were no apparent problems. On Tue,

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 PHP 5.5

2014-08-07 Thread Edgar Pettijohn
Of course we don't know what if anything you are attempting to use to serve php content because you have not supplied your configuration file. On 08/07/2014 09:20 AM, Francois Gingras wrote: > D'arcy, > > Those are actually erroneous responses. > > You do not need mod_php to serve php content; tha

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 PHP 5.5

2014-08-07 Thread Francois Gingras
D'arcy, Those are actually erroneous responses. You do not need mod_php to serve php content; that's the legacy approach. Also, AddType should never be used for dynamic content. The purpose of that directive is to change the content type for static files. Nowadays, you can use fcgi and even php-

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 PHP 5.5

2014-08-07 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 06:42:31 -0700 motty cruz wrote: > I am not getting anything similar to the example you have, I get a > blank page, (using chrome) then I get "file download" Sounds like one of three things. 1. You have not built the PHP Apache module. How to do this depends on the system tha

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 PHP 5.5

2014-08-07 Thread motty cruz
Thanks Good Guy, I am not getting anything similar to the example you have, I get a blank page, (using chrome) then I get "file download" Thanks, On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Good Guy wrote: > On 06/08/2014 21:38, motty cruz wrote: > > Thanks, I created index.php with the following: >

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 PHP 5.5

2014-08-06 Thread Good Guy
On 06/08/2014 21:38, motty cruz wrote: Thanks, I created index.php with the following: when I go to localhost, it download file. I don't get an error, Well I don't know what it means "it download file" because that small file is not supposed to download anything but it should show someth

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 PHP 5.5

2014-08-06 Thread Good Guy
On 06/08/2014 15:57, motty cruz wrote: Hello, I just finished installing Apache 2.4 and PHP 5.5 on FreeBSD 10, but Apache 2.4 is not loading PHP. can someone help me with this issue? Thanks in advance What platform? Windows? I can help you with windows but not Linux.

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 - non adoption reasons??

2014-07-18 Thread LuKreme
On 18 Jul 2014, at 11:31 , Good Guy wrote: > Upgrades should be about new features and new codes/syntax but the old one > should still work. I'm pretty happy not being stuck with apache 0.7¹ syntax, myself. ¹ I think that was the initial pre-release "a patchy server" version back in 1995. --

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 - non adoption reasons??

2014-07-18 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > "Upgrades should be about new features and new codes/syntax but the old > one should still work" > > I agree 100% > By and large, the developers who bring you Apache httpd for free are willing to maintain compatibility with a certain synt

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 - non adoption reasons??

2014-07-18 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 07/18/2014 07:31 PM, Good Guy wrote: > On 18/07/2014 15:35, Eric Covener wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:21 AM, David Favor >> wrote: >>> Biggest problem is with Apache changing format of conf entries. >> >> What do you mean by the format? >> > > I think what he is talking about is that

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 - non adoption reasons??

2014-07-18 Thread Edgar Pettijohn
"Upgrades should be about new features and new codes/syntax but the old one should still work" I agree 100% On 07/18/2014 12:31 PM, Good Guy wrote: > On 18/07/2014 15:35, Eric Covener wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:21 AM, David Favor > > wrote: > >> Biggest problem is with Apache changin

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 - non adoption reasons??

2014-07-18 Thread Good Guy
On 18/07/2014 15:35, Eric Covener wrote: On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:21 AM, David Favor > wrote: >> Biggest problem is with Apache changing format of conf entries. > > What do you mean by the format? > I think what he is talking about is that for each upgrades, apache becomes non-compliance w

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 - non adoption reasons??

2014-04-21 Thread Good Guy
On 10/04/2014 18:43, Joey J wrote: Apache 2.4 has had a stable release out for over 2 years but is only used by 2.5% of active Apache sites. Why is the adoption so low?? The Apache foundation has been recommending upgrading to 2.4 for some time and looking at the improvements I see significant

[users@httpd] Re: apache 2.4

2013-09-04 Thread LuKreme
On 04 Sep 2013, at 07:20 , Eric Covener wrote: > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:03 AM, LuKreme wrote: >> >> Is it the case that in apache 2.4 you must add a directory structure for >> every directory you want to access and then add explicit allow permissions >> for that directory? >> >> For examp

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 closing connection prematurely using webdav

2013-08-20 Thread Luiz Flavio Fernandes
Anyone having the same problem or have and ideias? 2013/8/15 Luiz Flavio Fernandes > Hi, > > I'm having problemas using apache 2.4.4.2 with webdav module. > > For some reason, it closes the connection before sending the HTML response > from the webdav module. > > On my old servers using apache

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4: Mod Cache: authorization required

2013-02-21 Thread Nicolas Daniels
Hi, > Isnt it what CacheStorePrivate is for? I tried with this option only, it doesn't work. Seems correct as the docs says: "Ordinarily, responses with Cache-Control: private header values will not be stored in the cache. The |CacheStorePrivate| directive allows this behavior to be overrid

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4: Mod Cache: authorization required

2013-02-20 Thread Igor Cicimov
On 18/02/2013 10:55 PM, "Nicolas Daniels" wrote: > > Hello, > > Ok I figured out how to allow caching for authenticated urls: adding "Cache-Control" header with public option do the trick. > Isnt it what CacheStorePrivate is for? > Now I still have the problem that the cache key is built upon the

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4: Mod Cache: authorization required

2013-02-18 Thread Nicolas Daniels
Hello, Ok I figured out how to allow caching for authenticated urls: adding "Cache-Control" header with public option do the trick. Now I still have the problem that the cache key is built upon the url BEFORE the rewrite occurs. Is it possible to change this behavior ? I tried with AddOut

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 for windows????

2012-10-21 Thread Good Guy
On 21/10/2012 09:23, Anton wrote: why are there no binaries at the *official* apache download site? Is there a reason for the delay ... I mean if apachelounge can build the binaries ... why can't he apache project itself. I always prefer to download products on their *official* site than on thi

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 for windows????

2012-10-21 Thread Anton
Lester Caine wrote: > http://www.apachelounge.com/download/ is the closest you will get to > 'official' downloads. ApacheLounge has always provided the latest binaries > and useful supporting modules. Hi, thanks for the link. But one question remains: why are there no binaries at the *officia