On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 12:45:48PM +0530, Jaspreet Singh wrote:
> hey,
>
> On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 16:25 +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> > On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:06:30PM +0530, Jaspreet Singh wrote:
> > > hi,
> > >
> > > I want to use apache to support 2000+ virt-hosts and log errors
> > > seperately
hey,
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 16:25 +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:06:30PM +0530, Jaspreet Singh wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > I want to use apache to support 2000+ virt-hosts and log errors
> > seperately for each virt-host.
> >
> > But apache opens and maintains fd's for each erro
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:06:30PM +0530, Jaspreet Singh wrote:
> hi,
>
> I want to use apache to support 2000+ virt-hosts and log errors
> seperately for each virt-host.
>
> But apache opens and maintains fd's for each error_log and access_log.
> And hence the select syscall ( which has a fd_se
Hi,
thanx for the reply.
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 14:19 +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
> Jaspreet Singh wrote:
>
> Not really - a google search would tell you more. There are modules
> written for the purpose (mod_vhost_alias or third-party alternatives),
> or there's a solution described on the mod_rewr
Jaspreet Singh wrote:
>>If you use conventional vhosts, yes. That's one reason there are
>>*different* options for mass virtual hosting. You should use one of
>>them for this and other reasons.
>>
>
> could, you please elaborate on different options.
Not really - a google search would tell you
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 13:36 +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
> Jaspreet Singh wrote:
>
> [ Please don't scatter this to so many list and individual addresses.
> If I see more than one copy of any followup you post, I will certainly
> not take the time to help you any further ]
>
sorry about that, i wa
Jaspreet Singh wrote:
[ Please don't scatter this to so many list and individual addresses.
If I see more than one copy of any followup you post, I will certainly
not take the time to help you any further ]
> I want to use apache to support 2000+ virt-hosts and log errors
> seperately for each vi
hi,
I want to use apache to support 2000+ virt-hosts and log errors
seperately for each virt-host.
But apache opens and maintains fd's for each error_log and access_log.
And hence the select syscall ( which has a fd_set of max 1024 fds)
fails .. and hence apache fails to start up.
Then i tried
