Thank you for your feeback, i guess i have to review the whole
configuration design in the migration process and move balancer definitions
in vhost section.
Regards.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> If migrating to 2.4, I would suggest using the method Yann describes
> an
If migrating to 2.4, I would suggest using the method Yann describes
and have each balancer defined in its own vhost section. This is
because it is most likely that inheriting balancers will be
deprecated/removed in later versions of httpd, simply because
(1) it doesn't make sense and (2) causes th
So is the main issue the amount of shm used, right?
> On Dec 19, 2014, at 5:04 AM, Sylvain Goulmy wrote:
>
> Hi Yann,
>
> Thank you for your feedback.
>
> My configuration is currently defining 338 virtual hosts and 169 proxy
> balancers.
>
> The balancers are defined in the main section. Ea
Yann,
I did some additionnal tests with the BalancerInherit directive. If I add
the directive "BalancerInherit Off" in the main section I still have the
issue (shm saturation) if the number of virtual hosts/balancers is too
important. With a single virtual host then I can access correctly to the
a
Hi Sylvain,
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Sylvain Goulmy wrote:
>
> My configuration is currently defining 338 virtual hosts and 169 proxy
> balancers.
>
> The balancers are defined in the main section. Each virtual host refers only
> one balancer.
>
> Here what i notice :
> - Apache creates
I also forgot to mention that i have set the BalancerInherit to Off before
loading the balancers definition. It unfortunatly doesn't change the
behaviour.
Sylvain
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Sylvain Goulmy wrote:
>
> Hi Yann,
>
> Thank you for your feedback.
>
> My configuration is current
Hi Yann,
Thank you for your feedback.
My configuration is currently defining 338 virtual hosts and 169 proxy
balancers.
The balancers are defined in the main section. Each virtual host refers
only one balancer.
Here what i notice :
- Apache creates one shm for each balancer
- Each virtual hosts
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> If you can manage to recompile the APR library used by your Apache 2.4
> (you probably did that already since 2.4 does not seem to be the
> version packaged with RHEL 6.4), you can use "./configure
> --enable-posix-shm ..." to use another shar
If you can manage to recompile the APR library used by your Apache 2.4
(you probably did that already since 2.4 does not seem to be the
version packaged with RHEL 6.4), you can use "./configure
--enable-posix-shm ..." to use another shared memory mechanism than
the default one (IPC SysV) which is l
I'm currently working on a migration from Apache 2.2 to 2.4 (2.4.10). I'm
facing an issue with the usage of proxy_balancer with Apache 2.4. They now
require the mod_slotmem_shm.so module to work correctly.
I have added this module but i noticed that a single proxy_balancer now
creates many memory
10 matches
Mail list logo