- Original Message -
> On 23.11.2011 14:07, Igor Galić wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> On 23.11.2011 13:11, Igor Galić wrote:
> >> > - Original Message -
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> I have adopted the patch for current head.
> >> >
> >> > Proposed in
> >> > http://svn.apac
On 23.11.2011 14:07, Igor Galić wrote:
- Original Message -
On 23.11.2011 13:11, Igor Galić wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
>>
>> I have adopted the patch for current head.
>
> Proposed in
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1205215
Thanks, how can I add my +1?
- Original Message -
> On 23.11.2011 13:11, Igor Galić wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >
> >>
> >> I have adopted the patch for current head.
> >
> > Proposed in
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1205215
>
> Thanks, how can I add my +1?
By becoming an http
On 23.11.2011 13:11, Igor Galić wrote:
- Original Message -
I have adopted the patch for current head.
Proposed in
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1205215
Thanks, how can I add my +1?
-
The of
- Original Message -
> On 22.11.2011 17:08, Igor Galić wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >>
>
> [snipp]
>
> >> > Will a back port for 2.2.x be available?
> >>
> >> Doesn't look like anybody has raised that particular issue yet:
> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/bran
On 22.11.2011 17:08, Igor Galić wrote:
- Original Message -
[snipp]
> Will a back port for 2.2.x be available?
Doesn't look like anybody has raised that particular issue yet:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
I'll propose it for 2.2.x
meh. This lo
- Original Message -
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On 22.11.2011 16:27, Igor Galić wrote:
> > > - Original Message -
> > >> On 22.11.2011 12:19, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> > >> > Dear List members,
> > >> >
> > >> > Setup:
> > >> >
> > >> > Apache 2.2.20
> > >
> > > First
- Original Message -
> On 22.11.2011 16:27, Igor Galić wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> On 22.11.2011 12:19, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> >> > Dear List members,
> >> >
> >> > Setup:
> >> >
> >> > Apache 2.2.20
> >
> > First off, 2.2.21 fixes CVE-2011-3192 - might want to check t
On 22.11.2011 16:27, Igor Galić wrote:
- Original Message -
On 22.11.2011 12:19, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Dear List members,
>
> Setup:
>
> Apache 2.2.20
First off, 2.2.21 fixes CVE-2011-3192 - might want to check that.
Yep, we are on the way :-) to update
http://svn.apache.org/r
On November 22, 2011 10:27 , Igor =?utf-8?Q?Gali=C4=87?=
wrote:
Could this be the reason why the ErrorDocument& ProxyErrorOverride
does not work with ajp?
I'm not entirely sure, but I believe to have seen this fixed in 2.4/trunk.
Yes, it's available starting in 2.3.12:
https://issues.apach
- Original Message -
> On 22.11.2011 12:19, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> > Dear List members,
> >
> > Setup:
> >
> > Apache 2.2.20
First off, 2.2.21 fixes CVE-2011-3192 - might want to check that.
> > Tomcat 6.0.32
> >
> > global config
> >
> > ###
> > ...
> > ProxyErrorOverride On
> > Err
On 22.11.2011 12:19, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Dear List members,
Setup:
Apache 2.2.20
Tomcat 6.0.32
global config
###
...
ProxyErrorOverride On
ErrorDocument 500 /500.html
ErrorDocument 404 /404.html
...
###
[snipp]
Question:
When the tomcat returns a 404 or 500 the httpd shows the tomcat
Dear List members,
Setup:
Apache 2.2.20
Tomcat 6.0.32
global config
###
...
ProxyErrorOverride On
ErrorDocument 500 /500.html
ErrorDocument 404 /404.html
...
###
balancer config
###
LoadModule proxy_balancer_module modules/mod_proxy_balancer.so
BalancerMember ajp://Server1:9201 loadfact
13 matches
Mail list logo