On 3/18/2011 2:36 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
> William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> I've not tried running the 'official builds', and while I would
> expect them to work but there have been reports of problems. That may just be
> finger
> trouble, but when reporting problems on the PHP list at least one can
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
If anyone wants to have a civil discourse, not in the role of the current
uninformed BFoD win32 "officious" port, there are several of us who will
steer you in the right direction :)
It is a debate that has been going on for some time on the PHP developers list
after
On 3/17/2011 4:53 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
> In PHP's release announcement today (for version 5.3.6), they announced that
> they are no
> longer releasing dll s that are compatible with the current builds of httpd
> for Windows.
> Are there any official builds that are compatible with PHP's VC9 bui
Yehuda Katz wrote:
In PHP's release announcement today (for version 5.3.6), they announced
that they are no longer releasing dll s that are compatible with the
current builds of httpd for Windows.
Are there any official builds that are compatible with PHP's VC9 builds
(or any plans to make them a
In PHP's release announcement today (for version 5.3.6), they announced that
they are no longer releasing dll s that are compatible with the current
builds of httpd for Windows.
Are there any official builds that are compatible with PHP's VC9 builds (or
any plans to make them available)?
Does anyo
