Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 config

> Op 17 nov. 2021 om 05:23 heeft Gabriel Santos > het volgende geschreven: > >  > Hi,my name is Gabriel and i want to build a apache server with SSLv2 > technology (because thee service i want to use only supports SSLv2) Use another service. > and i having errors with many openssl versions(

[users@httpd] apache 2.2

Hi,my name is Gabriel and i want to build a apache server with SSLv2 technology (because the service i want to use only supports SSLv2) and i having errors with many openssl versions(0.9.7-1.0.2) "SSL/TLS libraries were missing or unusable" P.S: i already installed libssl-dev

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 config

Hi,my name is Gabriel and i want to build a apache server with SSLv2 technology (because thee service i want to use only supports SSLv2) and i having errors with many openssl versions(0.9.8-1.0.2) "SSL/TLS libraries were missing or unusable"

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 and tls 1.2

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:51 Tom Jubb wrote: > Understood. Just trying to exhaust all possible solutions before doing an OS > upgrade. FYI, I recently completed a local src build of Apache 2.4.43 (and APR and APR-UTIL), and OpenSSL 1.1.1g on Debian 10 Buster. I have documented the process on m

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 and tls 1.2

s question is better brought up in a SuSE listerv and not the general Apache listserv. From: Dennis Clarke Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 12:59 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 and tls 1.2 On 7/23/20 4:41 PM, Tom Jubb wro

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 and tls 1.2

On 7/23/20 4:41 PM, Tom Jubb wrote: > New certs will successfully installed on Apache 2.2 Apache 2.2 ? That was End of Life a while ago. You have a bigger problem. Migrate to 2.4.43 and then deal with certs and such. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 and tls 1.2

New certs will successfully installed on Apache 2.2 but browsers now compain as they are not tls 1.2 compliant: https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=mail.gg-law.com&hideResults=on So, my consultant said we needed to change Apache to use mod_nss instead of mod_ssl to enable TLS. instal

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 Reinstall After a Crash Not Working With Perl and MyQL

I’ve had Apache 2.2 running on Windows Server2012 for several years. The host hardware is a dedicated server. The Apache server suddenly crashed and would not restart. Not being able to determine why, I reinstalled the software and it now can be stopped and started. Apache was previously hos

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 mod_headers question

Thank your for your reply. Yes, I have already traveled down that route and talked with our DevOps guys. The system that handles SSL termination is a system they want little or no configuration on. They (DevOps) understand that this could be handled there, but they wont make the change there. T

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 mod_headers question

It is perfectly normal for a backend that works with http to return internal Location headers with http. If apache is the backend of some other reverse proxy it is the job of that reverse proxy to use the correct url scheme requested by the client, that is, to revert the location headers back to "

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 mod_headers question

I have spent 8+hours scouring the web, reviewing the Apache Httpd Cookbook, the Definitive Reference, and the 2.2 documentation for mod_headers, mod_proxy and core. CONFIGURATION: Apache Version: Server version: Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) Server built: Jul 18 2016 15:24:00 SSL offloading happens bef

RE: [users@httpd] apache 2.2 - mod_authnz_ldap with SSL/TLS in chrootdir

id 3649] core_filters.c(525): [client 10.0.1.110:58427] core_output_filter: flushing because of FLUSH bucket From: Luca Toscano [mailto:toscano.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 10:06 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2 - mod_authnz_ldap

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2 - mod_authnz_ldap with SSL/TLS in chrootdir

Hi Andy, 2016-11-02 16:24 GMT+01:00 Speagle, Andy : > Hi Folks, > > > > I’m having some issues getting SSL or TLS working with mod_authnz_ldap in > my chroot’ed Apache 2.2 server on RHEL 6.8 … it works without SSL just > fine. I’m using the built-in “ChrootDir” directive with Apache. I seem to

[users@httpd] apache 2.2 - mod_authnz_ldap with SSL/TLS in chrootdir

Hi Folks, I'm having some issues getting SSL or TLS working with mod_authnz_ldap in my chroot'ed Apache 2.2 server on RHEL 6.8 ... it works without SSL just fine. I'm using the built-in "ChrootDir" directive with Apache. I seem to have all of the libraries, binaries and things in the chroot j

[users@httpd] apache 2.2 troubleshooting

Hi, i have an apache 2.2 used as a reverse proxy with caching in mem. Everything is working fine but after a few days the reverse proxy starts to send all the requests to the backend server. Is there a way to see what objects are cached in mem? Or should i switch to disk cache to see that? Regar

Re: [users@httpd] Apache-2.2 with LDAP authentication keeps spinning after authentication completes

Another interesting observation: web browser (Firefox) continues to show activity spinner and "read " status (with AuthLDAP active at web application initiation) even after the LDAP authentication is completed, the OpenLDAP server is stopped, and the LDAP network connection is dropped. I can't see

Re: [users@httpd] Apache-2.2 with LDAP authentication keeps spinning after authentication completes

The persistent LDAP connection between Apache/mod_authnz_ldap and OpenLDAP is not an LDAP nor OpenLDAP error. Debug logging has confirmed this. It appears that Apache(v2.2)/mod_authnz_ldap establishes and maintains a persistent network connection to the designated LDAP server. Documentation for mo

Re: [users@httpd] Apache-2.2 with LDAP authentication keeps spinning after authentication completes

2016-05-03 1:22 GMT+02:00 J.D. : > Centos-6.6+seLinux, Apache-2.2, OpenLDAP-2.4.40, OpenSSL-1.0.1e-fips > > Using the following sample Directory block, the Apache LDAP authentication > works > just fine, but when the web page is displayed - the activity spinner is > spinning > and the status bar s

[users@httpd] Apache-2.2 with LDAP authentication keeps spinning after authentication completes

Centos-6.6+seLinux, Apache-2.2, OpenLDAP-2.4.40, OpenSSL-1.0.1e-fips Using the following sample Directory block, the Apache LDAP authentication works just fine, but when the web page is displayed - the activity spinner is spinning and the status bar shows "Read ". Without the Apache LDAP authentic

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 End of life

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote: > I can't find anything official but 1.3 went EOL in 2010 and 2.0 went EOL in > 2013. > $ GET -m HEAD "http://$one_of_my_production_servers/"; 403 Forbidden Connection: close Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 17:26:12 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.42 (Unix)

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 End of life

Hello! 2016-03-21 17:11 GMT+01:00 James Smith : > > > On 3/21/2016 4:07 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote: > >> On 03/21/2016 08:51 AM, ismail berrada wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> Can someone tell me when Apache 2.2 EOL will occurs ? >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> >> I can't find anything official but 1.3 went EO

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 End of life

On 3/21/2016 4:07 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote: On 03/21/2016 08:51 AM, ismail berrada wrote: Hi Can someone tell me when Apache 2.2 EOL will occurs ? Regards I can't find anything official but 1.3 went EOL in 2010 and 2.0 went EOL in 2013. Not enough data points to say there's a trend,

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 End of life

 Thanks for the answer. Le Lundi 21 mars 2016 17h07, Michael A. Peters a écrit : On 03/21/2016 08:51 AM, ismail berrada wrote: > Hi > > Can someone tell me when Apache 2.2 EOL will occurs ? > > Regards > I can't find anything official but 1.3 went EOL in 2010 and 2.0 went EOL in 2

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 End of life

On 03/21/2016 08:51 AM, ismail berrada wrote: Hi Can someone tell me when Apache 2.2 EOL will occurs ? Regards I can't find anything official but 1.3 went EOL in 2010 and 2.0 went EOL in 2013. Not enough data points to say there's a trend, but it wouldn't surprise me if 2.2 doesn't have

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 End of life

Hi Can someone tell me when Apache 2.2 EOL will occurs ? Regards  

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2, mod_perl on windows 10. Help needed

Trying to set up a local environment for web application that we support. windows 10 OS Apache 2.2 installed. (win32) Mod_perl 5.12 installed. (win32) Strawberry perl 5.12 installed. (win32) Can successfully run a simple Hello.pm from localhost/hello with these configurations in http.conf, indica

[users@httpd] apache 2.2 with proxypass url stripped.

HI I am have an issue when the apache 2.2 proxypass the URL with filename has "=". when is proxypass it strip the any character before "=" character E.g  https://apple.com/test/file=test1.xml it pass as  https://apple.com/test/test1.xml. it stripping all the character before it pass. Any help wil

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 MOD_PROXY to Weblogic 12.1.3

Hello All We have been using MOD_PROXY to reverse proxy Weblogic 8, 10, 11 and 12.1.1. Recently we started working with Weblogic 12.1.3 and we're having authentication problems We have compared all setting side by side with WL 12.1.1 and found no differences in config. When running the re-writ

AW: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 RemoveType [wd-vc]

arth sucks. Von: Roman Gelfand [rgelfa...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Januar 2015 18:31 An: users@httpd.apache.org Betreff: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 RemoveType [wd-vc] I would like to display word documents server by apache 2.2 server in browser. To make sure it doesn't get do

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 RemoveType

I would like to display word documents server by apache 2.2 server in browser. To make sure it doesn't get downloaded, I put into virtual server configuration RemoveType .doc. The file is still being downloaded by both ie 11 and chrome. What else do I need to do to make sure the document appears

RE: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 RewriteRule/Proxypass and general processing flow

hange the context of my rules to exist at the server level? Thanks again, -Kimmel Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 09:26:10 -0400 From: cove...@gmail.com To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 RewriteRule/Proxypass and general processing flow On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:20 AM,

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 RewriteRule/Proxypass and general processing flow

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Lesley Kimmel wrote: > This leads me to believe that proxypass takes precedence over RewriteRule, > can you confirm this? ​Depends on the context of your RewriteRules. Yours imply or htaccess which runs later. ProxyPass happens before (instead of) the URL has

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 RewriteRule/Proxypass and general processing flow

Hi All! I'll try to make this as short as I can, but I need some assistance in understanding the Apache processing flow. I am using Apache 2.2 I have a requirement to disable access to a certain context (say, /xyz) for users of Firefox. From what I can gather the best way to do this is using m

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 proxy dropping content-length header for HEAD responses where content-length is 0

Hello all, We have an Apache 2.2 that we're using to proxy requests out to an external service, and have noticed that for HEAD responses where the content-length is 0, Apache seems to be dropping off the content-length response header. This is the verbose curl for the HEAD request when going dire

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 - Query String Validation Capability

Hello there, I am a beginner in Apache and trying to figure out a way to validate a query string in the request handled by Apache and proxy the request to backend application only upon validation of the query string value. I am using Oracle HTTP Server 11g (Apache 2.2) For Example My current

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2:How to enable module: mod_expires.c

On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 02:14:36PM +, Mark jensen wrote: > and I have found this line in conf file: > > LoadModule expires module modules/mod_expires.so > > but "ExpireDefault" didn't work There's no such directive in Apache 2.2 as "ExpireDefault". Perhaps if you tried "ExpiresDefault" you m

RE: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2:How to enable module: mod_expires.c

Doing httpd -M | grep expire: expires_module (shared) Syntax OK and I have found this line in conf file: LoadModule expires module modules/mod_expires.so but "ExpireDefault" didn't work

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2:How to enable module: mod_expires.c

Load it with LoadModule (use -M to show dynamically loaded modules.) On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Mark jensen wrote: > doing httpd -l returns: > > core.c > prefork.c > http_core.c > mod_so.c > > How to enable the mod_expires module? > -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com -

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2:How to enable module: mod_expires.c

doing httpd -l returns: core.c prefork.c http_core.c mod_so.c How to enable the mod_expires module?

RE: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 mod_headers: "RequestHeader edit" vs. environment variables

7;s based on the fact that the undesired JSESSIONID cookie contains an exclamation mark in it (it's set by Weblogic). If that changes I'm out of luck... -Original Message- From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 4:04 PM To: users@httpd.apache.o

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 mod_headers: "RequestHeader edit" vs. environment variables

> The first two lines above work fine, but unfortunately the last one > doesn't because the "RequestHeader edit" directive cannot reference > environment variables in its replacement string (why?). :~( These things are not just emergent. Someone has to ask for it. Someone else has to implement, te

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 mod_headers: "RequestHeader edit" vs. environment variables

Hello, First of all, let me give you some context. The Apache 2.2's webpage which describes mod_headers' "RequestHeader" directive says (specifically for the "edit" action): RequestHeader edit header value replacement [early|env=[!]variable] If this request header exists, its valu

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 + php 5.2 wordpress

Hello Igor, here is the mysql logs: 130128 13:38:42 mysqld_safe Starting mysqld daemon with databases from /var/db/mysql 130128 13:38:49 [Note] Plugin 'FEDERATED' is disabled. 130128 13:38:53 InnoDB: Started; log sequence number 0 44243 130128 13:38:55 [Note] Event Scheduler: Loaded 0 events 13012

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 + php 5.2 wordpress

On 06/03/2013 7:38 AM, "motty cruz" wrote: > > Hello, I'm have one instance of Wordpress running on a FreeBSD machine with php 5.2 install using Apache Web Server 2.2. Every time the webmaster edit pages I get the following error: > > 12:15:36 2013] [error] child process 27973 still did not exit,

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 + php 5.2 wordpress

Hello, I'm have one instance of Wordpress running on a FreeBSD machine with php 5.2 install using Apache Web Server 2.2. Every time the webmaster edit pages I get the following error: 12:15:36 2013] [error] child process 27973 still did not exit, sending a SIGKILL [Tue Mar 05 12:15:54 2013] [error

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2.x and CVE-2012-2333

> I do not have deeper knowledge about protocols but I think as follows: DTLS > means TLS for datagram packets so it means http does not use DTLS, right? On > the other hand, TLS is affected in OpenSSL 1.0.1 and later which means > 0.9.8-related version is not affected, right? > > Thus, can I imply

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2.x and CVE-2012-2333

Hi, I am questioning if Apache 2.2.22 with OpenSSL 0.9.8t is affected by CVE-2012-2333 (OpenSSL Invalid TLS/DTLS Record Denial of Service Vulnerability)? You may find the details of the vulnerability here: http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20120510.txt Here, it says that "DTLS applications a

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 authentication against a Mysql Database

On 11/19/2012 6:07 PM, David Mehler wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks to everyone who helped. I have it working. Here it is for > anyone this might help. > > Hth > Dave. > > Set up for Mysql authentication: > > Create a mysql database: > create database web; > grant select, insert, update, delete on

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 authentication against a Mysql Database

Hello, Thanks to everyone who helped. I have it working. Here it is for anyone this might help. Hth Dave. Set up for Mysql authentication: Create a mysql database: create database web; grant select, insert, update, delete on web.* to web_user@localhost identified by 'xxx'; flush privileges; use

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 authentication against a Mysql Database

Hello, Apache doesn't support password hashes generated by mysql. Use htpasswd or openssl to generate hashes that are supported by apache: htpasswd -nbm username password openssl passwd -apr1 password Adam Black, FINESEC.COM - authentication software for Apache On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:10 PM,

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 authentication against a Mysql Database

- Original Message - > Hello, > > When I inserted the user in to the mysql database I have a field > called password it's a varchar(64) field. For the password value I > used mysql's sha function so the entry looked like: > > sha('password') > > won the insert line. > > I'm not sure i

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 authentication against a Mysql Database

Hello, When I inserted the user in to the mysql database I have a field called password it's a varchar(64) field. For the password value I used mysql's sha function so the entry looked like: sha('password') won the insert line. I'm not sure if that answers your question. Thanks. Dave. On 11/

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 authentication against a Mysql Database

- Original Message - > Hello, > > I am still trying to get my apache to authenticate against a mysql > database. I've looked at my available options and it looked like > mod_auth_mysql was discontinued so that was a non-starter. My other > option was mod_dbd with the apr-util-mysql drive

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 authentication against a Mysql Database

Hello, I am still trying to get my apache to authenticate against a mysql database. I've looked at my available options and it looked like mod_auth_mysql was discontinued so that was a non-starter. My other option was mod_dbd with the apr-util-mysql driver, well that one also didn't work, I kept g

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 authentication against a Mysql Database

Hello, Do you have this working? If so can I get a look at your config? Thanks. Dave. On 11/18/12, Igor Galić wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> Hello, >> >> I'm wanting to set up Apache 2.2 to authenticate using either basic >> or >> digest authentication whichever I decide to do, a

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 authentication against a Mysql Database

- Original Message - > Hello, > > I'm wanting to set up Apache 2.2 to authenticate using either basic > or > digest authentication whichever I decide to do, against a Mysql > Database. I am running Apache 2.2 and mysql 5.52. > > Ive set up authentication using textfiles in the past now

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 authentication against a Mysql Database

Hello, I'm wanting to set up Apache 2.2 to authenticate using either basic or digest authentication whichever I decide to do, against a Mysql Database. I am running Apache 2.2 and mysql 5.52. Ive set up authentication using textfiles in the past now I am wanting to utilize a database. I've been g

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 proxy worker not being created from within virtual host

We've tested in CentOS 5.4 (apache 2.2.3) and CentOS 6.3 (apache 2.2.15) We are not seeing proxy workers get created when a proxy statement is created inside a . The documentation http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy.html#workers says that a ProxyPass statement or a block will create a

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2 can't keep up with apache 1.3

On 3/13/2012 12:25 PM, Tom Evans wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:19 PM, William Taylor > wrote: >> I wouldn't say it's silly, but definitely not the norm and obviously a >> low priority >> for everyone else. > > I would say that forking an entire new process to handle a single > request and t

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2 can't keep up with apache 1.3

On Mar 13, 2012, at 1:40 PM, William Taylor wrote: > It's unfortunate that it has to work this way but forks are pretty cheap > these days. > > No it doesn't generate content. It can't run as a CGI. Cheap != free no matter how cheap ;) ---

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2 can't keep up with apache 1.3

On Mar 13, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Tom Evans wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:19 PM, William Taylor > wrote: >> I wouldn't say it's silly, but definitely not the norm and obviously a >> low priority >> for everyone else. > > I would say that forking an entire new process to handle a single > reque

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2 can't keep up with apache 1.3

On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:25:54 AM, Tom Evans wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:19 PM, William Taylor > wrote: >> >> I wouldn't say it's silly, but definitely not the norm and obviously a >> low priority >> for everyone else. > > > I would say that forking an entire new process to handle a

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2 can't keep up with apache 1.3

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:19 PM, William Taylor wrote: > I wouldn't say it's silly, but definitely not the norm and obviously a > low priority > for everyone else. I would say that forking an entire new process to handle a single request and then exiting could possibly be the most silly way to se

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2 can't keep up with apache 1.3

On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:11:17 AM, Tom Evans wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:58 PM, William Taylor > wrote: >> >> On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:42:35 AM, Tom Evans wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:39 PM, William Taylor >>> wrote: Previously posted to dev and bu

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2 can't keep up with apache 1.3

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:58 PM, William Taylor wrote: > On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:42:35 AM, Tom Evans wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:39 PM, William Taylor >> wrote: >>> >>> Previously posted to dev and bugs. Posting here also in hopes of >>> capturing a greater audience that might hav

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2 can't keep up with apache 1.3

On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:42:35 AM, Tom Evans wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:39 PM, William Taylor > wrote: >> >> Previously posted to dev and bugs. Posting here also in hopes of >> capturing a greater audience that might have come >> across this issue before. >> >> We have written a modu

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2 can't keep up with apache 1.3

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:39 PM, William Taylor wrote: > Previously posted to dev and bugs. Posting here also in hopes of > capturing a greater audience that might have come > across this issue before. > > We have written a modules for apache that for certain reasons requires > one hit per child.

[users@httpd] apache 2.2 can't keep up with apache 1.3

Previously posted to dev and bugs. Posting here also in hopes of capturing a greater audience that might have come across this issue before. We have written a modules for apache that for certain reasons requires one hit per child. On apache 1.3 this worked fine with a minor tweak to SCOREBOARD_MAI

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 on Windows refuses to process more than 5 requests from one client concurrently

Hello, I have been trying to configure Apache 2.2 running on Windows to simultaneously handle a large number - say, a hundred - of incoming web requests from a single UNIX machine. I have already raised ThreadsPerChild on the Apache server to 128. To isolate the problem, I also wrote a short Perl

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 RedirectMatch url behaviour in a Directory context?

I don't know the answer, but the way I would probably try to find the answer is to do what you have already done: Try it and see what happens. - Y On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Morse, Richard E.MGH wrote: > Hi! I was wondering if anyone had had a chance to look at this? Or could > tell me w

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 RedirectMatch url behaviour in a Directory context?

Hi! I was wondering if anyone had had a chance to look at this? Or could tell me where to look to find the answer? The manual doesn't seem to have this, noone has answered my query on ServerFault, and my skills at reading the httpd source aren't up to answering it that way... Thanks, Ricky On

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 RedirectMatch url behaviour in a Directory context?

Hi! I was wondering if RedirectMatch did any stripping of the URL when in a Directory context? According to the documentation, a Rewrite rule does have the URL stripped so that it starts with the directory, but the documentation doesn't say whether or not this also happens for RedirectMatch. I

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 : input filters

I need help related to Input filter I am trying to accomplish. My target is to call an external program to validate the request and modify/return the response accordingly. I am using the below to accomplish this. ExtFilterDefine writetext cmd="/usr/local/bin/perl /home/carnab/servers/apache-4

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 > Timeout & RequestReadTimeout (mod_reqtimeout)

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Geoff Millikan wrote: >>> When both RequestReadTimeout and Timeout values are set, the smaller >>> of the two takes precedence, right?  For example, if Timeout 6 and >>> RequestReadTimeout header=10 body=30 then Apache will close the connection >>> at 6 seconds and

RE: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 > Timeout & RequestReadTimeout (mod_reqtimeout)

>> When both RequestReadTimeout and Timeout values are set, the smaller >> of the two takes precedence, right?  For example, if Timeout 6 and >> RequestReadTimeout header=10 body=30 then Apache will close the connection >> at 6 seconds and the RequestReadTimeout will never be activated, right?

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 > Timeout & RequestReadTimeout (mod_reqtimeout)

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Geoff Millikan wrote: > When both RequestReadTimeout and Timeout values are set, the smaller of the > two takes precedence, right?  For example, if Timeout 6 > and RequestReadTimeout header=10 body=30 then Apache will close the > connection at 6 seconds and the

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 > Timeout & RequestReadTimeout (mod_reqtimeout)

When both RequestReadTimeout and Timeout values are set, the smaller of the two takes precedence, right? For example, if Timeout 6 and RequestReadTimeout header=10 body=30 then Apache will close the connection at 6 seconds and the RequestReadTimeout will never be activated, right? http://httpd.

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 + PHP5 + SuExec + (fast-cgi or mod_fcgid)

Hello Everyone, I am researching how to run PHP as CGI with Apache's Suexec module. Up to this point we have been using PHP as an Apache mod, but are looking to move to the more secure solution. I am not sure this is exactly the right list top post to so if anyone knows a better one please l

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 connections full

On 06/07/2011 10:59 PM, Rob Morin wrote: Hello all was not sure how to word my subject line... I posted a few weeks back on how could I increase performance of apache... I received quite a few replies and they all helped a bit... We even added an additional server to our server cluster to to

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 connections full

Hello all was not sure how to word my subject line. I posted a few weeks back on how could I increase performance of apache. I received quite a few replies and they all helped a bit. We even added an additional server to our server cluster to total 7 web servers now, all load balanced by HAPro

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 with PHP 5.3.6 (VC9)

On 3/18/2011 2:36 AM, Lester Caine wrote: > William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > I've not tried running the 'official builds', and while I would > expect them to work but there have been reports of problems. That may just be > finger > trouble, but when reporting problems on the PHP list at least one can

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 with PHP 5.3.6 (VC9)

William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: If anyone wants to have a civil discourse, not in the role of the current uninformed BFoD win32 "officious" port, there are several of us who will steer you in the right direction :) It is a debate that has been going on for some time on the PHP developers list after

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 with PHP 5.3.6 (VC9)

On 3/17/2011 4:53 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote: > In PHP's release announcement today (for version 5.3.6), they announced that > they are no > longer releasing dll s that are compatible with the current builds of httpd > for Windows. > Are there any official builds that are compatible with PHP's VC9 bui

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 with PHP 5.3.6 (VC9)

Yehuda Katz wrote: In PHP's release announcement today (for version 5.3.6), they announced that they are no longer releasing dll s that are compatible with the current builds of httpd for Windows. Are there any official builds that are compatible with PHP's VC9 builds (or any plans to make them a

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 with PHP 5.3.6 (VC9)

In PHP's release announcement today (for version 5.3.6), they announced that they are no longer releasing dll s that are compatible with the current builds of httpd for Windows. Are there any official builds that are compatible with PHP's VC9 builds (or any plans to make them available)? Does anyo

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 LocationMatch problem

Hi All, I am trying to invoke following in apache2.2. Basically, requirement is any URL starting with /portal should go to weblogic except /portal/foo. This is working fine in apache 2.0 but in apache 2.2 we are getting 500 Internal server, Neither Weblogic Cluster or Weblogic Host is not speci

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 URL Rewriting Guide From Static to Dynamic 404 Not Found script not found or unable to stat: redirect:/printenv.pl

Apache users: I've boiled the example down, attempted to clarify, and re-posted it on the debian-user mailing list: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2011/02/msg02171.html David - The official User-To-User support for

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 URL Rewriting Guide From Static to Dynamic 404 Not Found script not found or unable to stat: redirect:/printenv.pl

On 02/20/2011 12:37 PM, Igor Galić wrote: Why? >> I'm trying to learn how to use the Apache rewrite module > (http://bash.org/?866112) As a matter of fact, I *do* know how to operate a jackhammer. Do you need your demons let out? ;-) Also, I have attempted to enable the rewrite log an

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 URL Rewriting Guide From Static to Dynamic 404 Not Found script not found or unable to stat: redirect:/printenv.pl

- Original Message - > Apache users: > > I'm trying to learn how to use the Apache rewrite module to redirect > incoming hits for virtual *.html pages to Perl CGI scripts using the > information provided in the Apache 2.2 manual "URL Rewriting Guide" > chapter "From Static to Dynamic" se

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 URL Rewriting Guide From Static to Dynamic 404 Not Found script not found or unable to stat: redirect:/printenv.pl

Apache users: I'm trying to learn how to use the Apache rewrite module to redirect incoming hits for virtual *.html pages to Perl CGI scripts using the information provided in the Apache 2.2 manual "URL Rewriting Guide" chapter "From Static to Dynamic" section: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 as reverse proxy for SharePoint server?

Hi all, This is my first post to the apache list -- please bear with me, though I'll try to do this the right way. Our team is new to Apache. We have a SharePoint 2007 app that sits on our internal server, at an address we'll call http://internal.site.com. We are required to use Apache as a reve

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2 with mod_ntlm not working

Hi, I'm attempting to get mod_ntlm2 working (I've not previously used it). On a FreeBSD 8.1 server I have installed apache 2.2 and mod_ntlm and added a section to the httpd.conf like: AuthName "NTLM Auth" AuthType NTLM NTLMAuth on NTLMAuthoritative on NTLMDomain

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2

DiRico, Nick wrote: > Hello, > > I've checked on the httpd.apache.org site for information on when the > stable Apache 2.2 release will be made public but did not find an actual > date. Does anyone know when Apache 2.2 will be made public? When it's ready. We don't do silly deadlines. That me

[users@httpd] Apache 2.2

Hello,   I’ve checked on the httpd.apache.org site for information on when the stable Apache 2.2 release will be made public but did not find an actual date.  Does anyone know when Apache 2.2 will be made public?   If this is not the appropriate alias for this kind of question please le