Hi Hermant,
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Hemant Chaudhary
wrote:
>
> Q1. Startup process is reading configuration two times and creating
> conftree. Why do we need to read configuration script twice? Is there any
> difference in conftree after first and second read of configuration script.
Hi All,
While Debugging apache, I encountered with following questions. I am unable
to get answers for the following questions, please help to answer them.
Q1. Startup process is reading configuration two times and creating
conftree. Why do we need to read configuration script twice? Is there any
Hello,
We are running Apache 2.0.63, developer required and this is for use behind the
firewall, with PHP 5.1.5.
We are now running into the "FATAL: emalloc(): Unable to allocate 35 bytes"
error. Googling I have seen post
regarding MPM thread count configurations re this issue, but we are runn
Why are you reading and using examples from docs for the current version
of httpd when you are actually using an ancient and soon to be
unsupported version of httpd?
2.4 != 2.0
Upgrade to 2.4, or, if for whatever reason you can not do so, and I'm
yet to hear a justifiable reason off anybody, then
*Hi there ... i have this major problem. *
*What i need ? *
*To access some shared folder throught apache 2.0. Need some users to do
the same. This is explained on this document: *
*http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/platform/windows.html#windrivemap and
Configuring Access to Network Resources. I edi
Hi all,
recently we've did a performance-evaluation on Apache 2.0.
Our testing machine software:
- debian sid / unstable with apache 2.0.54 with mpm worker
- kernel 2.6.11
Our testing machines hardware:
- dual-cpu machine (2 x AMD Opteron 1.6 ghz, 2048 mb ram and pci-x
busspeed to not
Thanks
The ProxyPassReverse was the issue... It works
Greetings,
Herwarth
-Original Message-
From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 13:31
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.0 as reverse proxy using mod_
HTTP 302 is not an error: it is a redirection. The thing which is wrong with
that is the Location header which makes a reference to a server which is not
known to the clients: webserver-internal. In other words, the backend server
tells the browser to make a request for
http://webserver-interna
Ok I made a mistake in the initial question
When someone goes to https://webserver it has to be redirected to
http://webserver-internal/dealer/start
You were right on https://login it has no subdirectory redirect and this works
without the rewrite...
I got the following 302 found error from th
OK Here is the deal: Your rewriterule is unnecessary. That's probably what
caused the 302.
What your rewriterule does is to send a redirect to https://webserver/ in
response to a request for the root path https://webserver/ (or a redirect to
https://login/ in response to a request for the root
Hello,
The configuration of virtual host https://login is the same:
Listen ip-address:443
ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ServerName webserver
ProxyPass / http://login-internal/
ProxyPassReverse / http://login-internal/
SSLEngine on
SSLCertificateFile /etc/httpd/conf/ssl.
What is the configuration of the virtual host for https://login/ ???
What did you intend that the following line would do ?
RewriteRule ^/$ https://webserverl/$1 [R,L]
What host is it supposed to redirect to? Is "webserverl" (_l_) a typo?? If it
is a typo and you intended to make it "webse
Title: Message
hello,
i have some
difficulties using apache webserver as a reverse proxy. i am sure it has to do
something with url rewriting.
the situation is as
follows.
- at our company we
have some external ip address accessible via the internet. these ip addresses
has to be assig
To bring the secure server down on one instance would the easiest way
be commenting out
#llisten 443 and then issuing a "apachectl graceful", and Vice versa
for port 80?
Can one instance have Vitural Server Hosting on port 80 but not on the
Secure Server?
Also it might be a nightmare to configure P
On 6/14/05, Kory Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Question:
>
> Would it be better to setup Apache Secure Server and NON Secure Server
> on two separate configuration instances, or one just one instance?
> Would it be a performance hit to have it setup as two separate server
> instances?
It
Question:
Would it be better to setup Apache Secure Server and NON Secure Server
on two separate configuration instances, or one just one instance?
Would it be a performance hit to have it setup as two separate server
instances?
--
Kory Wheatley
-
16 matches
Mail list logo
