Thanks! I will get more info and post what I find or route I go.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Ben Timby wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Mohit Anchlia
> wrote:
>> Appreciate all the input! Those things were already part of my list
>> that are mentioned in this email.
>>
>> What I
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Appreciate all the input! Those things were already part of my list
> that are mentioned in this email.
>
> What I was trying to point was that we are really in restrictive env
> where server A can't be changed and 3rd party may not agree to
Appreciate all the input! Those things were already part of my list
that are mentioned in this email.
What I was trying to point was that we are really in restrictive env
where server A can't be changed and 3rd party may not agree to change.
So I was wondering if there is something like caching on
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> thanks! F5 supports the cookies and is recommended way but the problem
> is server A is not managed by us and may be very difficult to
> convience them to enter cookie (changing code). Is it possible to
> embed cookies for non-browser client
thanks! F5 supports the cookies and is recommended way but the problem
is server A is not managed by us and may be very difficult to
convience them to enter cookie (changing code). Is it possible to
embed cookies for non-browser clients in serverA?
Are there any other options if server A can't be
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Yes but when we receive request it is not from the end user but other
> host. For eg:
>
> User -> server A (prepares file) -> (http request that need load
> balancing) Our host
>
> So it's server A actually making the request not the user b
Yes but when we receive request it is not from the end user but other
host. For eg:
User -> server A (prepares file) -> (http request that need load
balancing) Our host
So it's server A actually making the request not the user but we need
to load balance user because this user can sign off and c
Aren't the requests from one user coming from the same ip? This method will
cause the requests coming from one source ip address always go to the same
server ip address ... but as I said maybe I'm missing something :)
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> But this doesn't work
But this doesn't work for scenario that I described where user
connects to server and then server sends the requests to us. We really
want to load balance users not the servers.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Igor Cicimov wrote:
> Also the difference between GTM and LTM is that GTM enables fail
Also the difference between GTM and LTM is that GTM enables fail-over
between geographically different sites and for LTM that is possible only for
local sites. Nothing to do with the persistence feature.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Igor Cicimov wrote:
> Strange because a quick search gives
Strange because a quick search gives me this
http://devcentral-sea.f5.com/Community/GroupDetails/tabid/1082223/asg/50/aft/26947/showtab/groupforums/Default.aspx
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Are you referrring to GTM or LTM. I have looked into it and even
> talked to F
Are you referrring to GTM or LTM. I have looked into it and even
talked to F5 but currently they don't have this functionality for
Prod.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Igor Cicimov wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Just scanned through the thread quickly so not sure if this makes any sense
> but what about
Hi guys,
Just scanned through the thread quickly so not sure if this makes any sense
but what about F5 source IP stickiness?
Cheers,
Igor
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Currently, the load balancer don't provide the user
> stickyness/persistence for 'x' amount of time.
Currently, the load balancer don't provide the user
stickyness/persistence for 'x' amount of time. At this point only
option I see is that of creating a custom solution. It looks like
there is no good solution.
Problem here is User can be directed to any site by load balancer in
active active scen
Thanks! We are using F5 GTM as global load balancer with LTM. So
global load balancing is not a problem. Problem is user stickyness
that need to persist beyond individual session.
I forgot to mention that the problem is that these connections come
from the servers using http rather than browser an
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Apache 2:
>
> We use apache 2 and we have 2 data centers. Problem is that both data
> centers are active. So if User uploads a file for eg: in site A that
> User can be directed to site B. Files are kept in sync asynchronously.
> And it could
Apache 2:
We use apache 2 and we have 2 data centers. Problem is that both data
centers are active. So if User uploads a file for eg: in site A that
User can be directed to site B. Files are kept in sync asynchronously.
And it could take as long as 1 hr to bring them in sync on the other
data cent
17 matches
Mail list logo
