Re: [us...@httpd] mod_vhost_alias + ssl

2009-03-07 Thread Eric Covener
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 5:49 PM, pavel.stratil-...@fenix.cz wrote: > > well the patch is out there a long time ... distros package it with apache > so, while it may not be currently a part of apache's official release yet, > i don't think its a wise thing to wait for the official sni apache and the

Re: [us...@httpd] mod_vhost_alias + ssl

2009-03-07 Thread pavel.stratil-...@fenix.cz
Eric Covener wrote: On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 5:03 PM, pavel.stratil-...@fenix.cz wrote: Hi, With SNI it is now possible to use more certificates with one ip address. Unfortunately there's no mod_vhost_alias support (and I'm not aware of a workaround). So, assuming I use "VirtualDocumentRoot

Re: [us...@httpd] mod_vhost_alias + ssl

2009-03-07 Thread Eric Covener
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 5:03 PM, pavel.stratil-...@fenix.cz wrote: > Hi, > > With SNI it is now possible to use more certificates with one ip address. > Unfortunately there's no mod_vhost_alias support (and I'm not aware of a > workaround). So, assuming I use "VirtualDocumentRoot > /var/www/vhosts/

[us...@httpd] mod_vhost_alias + ssl

2009-03-07 Thread pavel.stratil-...@fenix.cz
Hi, With SNI it is now possible to use more certificates with one ip address. Unfortunately there's no mod_vhost_alias support (and I'm not aware of a workaround). So, assuming I use "VirtualDocumentRoot /var/www/vhosts/%-2.1/%-2.0.%-1.0/htdocs/%-3+/" to map example.com --> /var/www/vhosts