Please do Cc me on every reply. I'm subscribed to the allow post list,
but I am not subscribed to receive list posts. Can't stand yet another
mailing list at this point, just for one thread.
> > "A dash indicates that no substitution should be performed (the
> > existing path is passed through
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann
wrote:
> "A dash indicates that no substitution should be performed (the
> existing path is passed through untouched). This is used when a flag
> (see below) needs to be applied without changing the path."
>
> Applying an R=301 flag in my cas
On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 00:15 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> Thanks Igor and Eric for your help. :) However, I'm not convinced
> that's the cause here. Below is a bare minimum example that shows the
> weird behavior I started with...
Sorry for replying to myself. Below is some more fodder gene
Thanks Igor and Eric for your help. :) However, I'm not convinced
that's the cause here. Below is a bare minimum example that shows the
weird behavior I started with...
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 09:34 +1000, Igor Cicimov wrote:
> Your 301 rule is wrong. As i said it should match the URI parth
> meani
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann
wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 08:28 +1000, Igor Cicimov wrote:
>> Your RewriteRule is wrong it works with the URI part only and not the
>> full URL. Read the mod_rewrite docos and correct your rule.
>
> Argh! An RTFM response. I probably deserve
Your 301 rule is wrong. As i said it should match the URI parth meaning the
part after the slash following the domain name and not the whole URL. So no
http:// in the rewrite rule hope this makes it more clear.
Sent from my phone
On May 7, 2010 8:48 AM, "Karsten Bräckelmann"
wrote:
On Fri, 2010
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 08:28 +1000, Igor Cicimov wrote:
> Your RewriteRule is wrong it works with the URI part only and not the
> full URL. Read the mod_rewrite docos and correct your rule.
Argh! An RTFM response. I probably deserve it. But...
I did read the docs. Lots of 'em. Still, I don't see w
Your RewriteRule is wrong it works with the URI part only and not the full
URL. Read the mod_rewrite docos and correct your rule.
Sent from my phone
On May 7, 2010 7:44 AM, "Karsten Bräckelmann"
wrote:
Please Cc me on every reply. I'm subscribed to the allow post list, but
I am not subscribed
Please Cc me on every reply. I'm subscribed to the allow post list, but
I am not subscribed to receive list posts. Can't stand yet another
mailing list at this point. ;)
Yes, I know mod_rewrite is voodoo. ;) Anyway, here's a (somewhat)
stripped down example of a case I really don't understand w
