Hello to all,
I have a question regarding the use of an external RewriteMap (prg) on a
high-traffic website.
My goal is to implement a redirection at the root of the site, depending on
some request attributes (User-Agent and more) sent to an external HTTP
service.
So I implemented a perl s
The local PHP User Group in Melbourne, Australia, wants to have a
session on mod_rewrite. Is there anyone in Melbourne who would be
willing to give a brief presentation? It's a PUG, so obviously
informal and small.
Please respond to me directly.
Thanks.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
On Tue, October 19, 2010 07:48, Tushar Chavan wrote:
> RewriteRule ^/(sap\(.*) http://srmdev.kjo.com.sa:8000/sap($1 [P,L]
You have a missing (
RewriteRule ^/sap\((.*) http://srmdev.kjo.com.sa:8000/sap($1 [P,L]
Hint: RewriteLog and RewriteLogLevel
Joost
-
Hi Experts,
In my case mod_rewrite is not working. Below is the case.
Url
https://srmdevarp02.domain/sap(bD1lbiZjPTExNiZwPTMyODMxJnY9NyUyZTAxMDYmaT0xJnM9U0lEJTNhQU5PTiUzYXNybWRldl9TRURfMDAlM2FGc3U4REN3TDVnckM1LWpGWXBfSlUyTWlQV3hENmM4VnRhbkdsU0xWLUFUVA==)/bc/bsp/sap/ros_prescreen/main.do
S
> everything going to https://somesite.com needs to go to http://somesite.com
> so for example https://somesite.com/somedir/somefile.php?somevar=someval
> needs to be redirected to
> http://somesite.com/somedir/somefile.php?somevar=someval
> and that is true except for when goint to say
> http://so
I've tried dozens of iterations of rules, from simple like ^wp-login
to much harder and more complex ones matching the whole address or only
a part of one, it seems that i cant get any of them to work, either the
rule will rewrite all the urls to http, or i get into an infinite
redirect loop..
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:43 PM, James Jones wrote:
> can someone explain why neither of these rules work:
Without a rewritelog or a description of what URL is/is-not rewritten
as you expect, it will be difficult.
What context are your rules in? htaccess, , ?
> Rule 1:
> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HO
can someone explain why neither of these rules work:_
Rule 1:_
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} ^(.*)(?!wp-login) [NC]
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} on
RewriteRule (.*) http://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L]
_Rule 2:_
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^wp-login(.*)$
RewriteRule .? - [S=1]
RewriteCond %{
On Oct 8, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST},${hn:www} ^([^,]+),\1
Eric,
Thanks for the pointer, it worked like a charm. Note to others, this doesn't
appear to work with 1.3
--brian
-
The off
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Brian Hirt wrote:
> Is there any way to accomplish something like the following?
>
> RewriteMap hn txt:/apache/config/hostname.map
> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ${hn:www} [NC]
>
you can't have variables of any kind in the regex, because it's only
compiled once
Is there any way to accomplish something like the following?
RewriteMap hn txt:/apache/config/hostname.map
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST}${hn:www} [NC]
Thanks!
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Serve
Ok, thanks for mentioning RewriteLog, didn't know there is an extra logfile
for mod_rewrite. That helped me figuring it out:
In the second example, apache recognizes the rewritten url equals the
original url and aborts rewriting process. ("initial URL equal rewritten
URL: test/server.php [IGNORING
On 24/09/2010 4:36 PM, Walther Bauer wrote:
Yeah, I've unterstood that so far. But why does the second example _not_
produce an infinite loop?
You need to check the RewriteLog to find out why. It may depend on the context,
or other factors.
Frank
---
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Walther Bauer <2313...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, I've unterstood that so far. But why does the second example _not_
> produce an infinite loop?
Can you attach a rewritelog of the two cases? Must be some usually
uninteresting quirk as opposed to the standard l
Yeah, I've unterstood that so far. But why does the second example _not_
produce an infinite loop?
On 24/09/2010 9:59 AM, Walther Bauer wrote:
This .htaccess snippet creates an "Request exceeded the limit of 10 internal
redirects"-error on my server (XAMPP):
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ ./server.php
while the following does not:
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ server.php
So why
This .htaccess snippet creates an "Request exceeded the limit of 10 internal
redirects"-error on my server (XAMPP):
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ ./server.php
while the following does not:
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ server.php
So why does the "./" actually make a difference?
Than
But same thing is working with mod_php, I am sure problem with mod_fcgid, not
the php script.
Regards,
Igor Cicimov wrote:
>
> And whats wrong with the rule? Looks to me that your php script is not
> right.
>
> Sent from my phone
>
> On Aug 28, 2010 7:50 PM, "Umar" wrote:
>
>
> Dear User,
And whats wrong with the rule? Looks to me that your php script is not
right.
Sent from my phone
On Aug 28, 2010 7:50 PM, "Umar" wrote:
Dear User,
Recently i have configured mod_fcgid + php + apache on FreeBSD everything is
working fine. But my mod_rewrite rul is not working.
Here is my virt
Dear User,
Recently i have configured mod_fcgid + php + apache on FreeBSD everything is
working fine. But my mod_rewrite rul is not working.
Here is my virtualhost setting
ServerAdmin unix...@gmail.com
DocumentRoot "/usr/local/www/mydata"
ServerName unix.expample.org
ErrorLog "
Got it working - changed to Options All.
Thanks
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Ross Noonan wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> Yes I am on windows 7 and I have not started my editor as admin but the
> module is loaded in my php info which would indicate that my changes are
> taking effect??
>
Thanks for the reply.
Yes I am on windows 7 and I have not started my editor as admin but the
module is loaded in my php info which would indicate that my changes are
taking effect??
"Does garbage in your .htaccess trigger a 500 error?" Sorry for my ignorance
but what do you mean here?
On Sat, J
> [Sat Jul 17 17:53:50 2010] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File does not exist:
> C:/htdocs/competition/login
Are you on windows7 and editing a httpd.conf installed into Program
Files w/o starting your editor as admin?
Does garbage in your .htaccess trigger a 500 error?
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gma
Hi,
I have recently got a new pc and have installed php/mysql and apache.
Everything works fine except for the mod_rewrite. I have uncommented the
"LoadModule rewrite_module modules/mod_rewrite.so" and added this:
#
# Possible values for the Options directive are "None", "All",
# or any
Actually I figured it out finally , I had to set the RewriteBase to /scripts
and voila.
Thanks for all the feedbacks though set me on the right path.
Cheers.
From: ssab...@hotmail.com
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [us...@httpd] mod_rewrite - Error when trying to rewrite one
@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [us...@httpd] mod_rewrite - Error when trying to rewrite one cgi
script to another
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 15:08:44 -0700
Alright, finally got the rewrite log to work and here is what it spits out when
I attempt the redirect described earlier:
[07/Jul/2010:15:05:07 --0700
t; Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 08:18:23 -0400
> From: cove...@gmail.com
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] mod_rewrite - Error when trying to rewrite one cgi
> script to another
>
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:41 AM, S. Saberi wrote:
> > actually I just put the
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:41 AM, S. Saberi wrote:
> actually I just put the directive into the httpd.conf file and i see that
> the log file is being created upon restart of apache.
>
> But when I invokde the rewrite nothing gets logged into it.
>
> Any guidance is greatly appreciated.
>
It's gott
Subject: RE: [us...@httpd] mod_rewrite - Error when trying to rewrite one cgi
script to another
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 20:12:44 -0700
Please excuse my ignorance I went though that link but I still don't understand
how it needs to be defined.
Do I have to put it in httpd.conf? Could you please
> Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] mod_rewrite - Error when trying to rewrite one cgi
> script to another
>
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 3:41 PM, S. Saberi wrote:
> > I added the the RewriteLog entry but no matter which location i specify I
> > get the following error:
> >
>
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 3:41 PM, S. Saberi wrote:
> I added the the RewriteLog entry but no matter which location i specify I
> get the following error:
>
> "C:/Program Files/Apache Software Foundation/Apache2.2/scripts/.htaccess:
> RewriteLog not allowed here"
>
> What am I missing here?
>
Rewrite
> From: cove...@gmail.com
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] mod_rewrite - Error when trying to rewrite one cgi
> script to another
>
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:58 AM, S. Saberi wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am getting a 404 error when tr
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:58 AM, S. Saberi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am getting a 404 error when trying to rewrite one cgi script to another
> one such as:
>
> Options FollowSymLinks
> RewriteEngine on
> RewriteRule ^from.cgi to.cgi
Tried with a proper RewriteBase? What does the RewriteLog say?
-
Hi all,
I am getting a 404 error when trying to rewrite one cgi script to another one
such as:
Options FollowSymLinks
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule ^from.cgi to.cgi
With this rule above my expectaion is that the following url:
mydomain/cgi-bin/from.cgi will be rewritten to mydomain/cgi-bin/to
Hi,Tom
Thanks a lot for your help.After going through some more documentation
and tests I did generate the correct URL and it is actually working
the way you said.
Thanks for your explanation.
--
Tapas
http://mightydreams.blogspot.com
http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Xen_on_4_app_servers
-
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Alex Harvey wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been unable to find this documented anywhere, so here goes.
>
> According to the Apache documentation: "The [S] flag is used to skip rules
> that you don't want to run." Great, so I can skip N rules by using the [S=N]
> flag.
Hi all,
I have been unable to find this documented anywhere, so here goes.
According to the Apache documentation: "The [S] flag is used to skip rules
that you don't want to run." Great, so I can skip N rules by using the [S=N]
flag.
But how are chained rules counted? The documentation is ambiguo
Something I also found useful was to use the following directive.
RewriteMap escaping int:unescape
before my RW rules and changing the RW rules like this
RewriteRule ^/user ${escaping:https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI}} [R,L]
etc..
have a look at
http://www.dracos.co.uk/code/apache-rewrite-pro
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Krist van Besien
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm not entirely sure what your problem is. There is not a single
>> question in your mail.
>>
>> What is your problem? What are you trying to achieve? What are you
>>
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Krist van Besien
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm not entirely sure what your problem is. There is not a single
> question in your mail.
>
> What is your problem? What are you trying to achieve? What are you
> getting in stead?
+1 -- I punched out before reading the entire
Hello,
I'm not entirely sure what your problem is. There is not a single
question in your mail.
What is your problem? What are you trying to achieve? What are you
getting in stead?
Krist
--
krist.vanbes...@gmail.com
kr...@vanbesien.org
Bremgarten b. Bern, Switzerland
--
A: It reverses the nor
The configuration is like this
Code:
|--192.168.1.1
|(site1.abc.com)
|
|--192.168.1.2
|(site2.a
Thanks for this Reinhard,
I agree, the env settings in my rules are just making a lot of noise. Your
rules are much easier.
One problem I see is that your [2] seems to create an infinite loop. When a
user go to http://localhost/myapp. This will infinitely trigger the rule over
and over again.
W
Hi,
the problem is that if a site which shouldn't be served by https is
called by http your first rewriterule sets ps:https but the first
rewriterule after #[2] isn't used because HTTPS is not on.
I think you can also have your desired effect much more easier like this:
#[1] all /user, /subs
Hello group,
I am working on the mod_ssl configuration on a website and trying to achieve
following:
When a user accesses a page posting sensitive data to the server, the page
should be accessed in httpS mode. What I am doing to achieve this is that I
have a set of rewrite rules that will match
Please do Cc me on every reply. I'm subscribed to the allow post list,
but I am not subscribed to receive list posts. Can't stand yet another
mailing list at this point, just for one thread.
> > "A dash indicates that no substitution should be performed (the
> > existing path is passed through
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann
wrote:
> "A dash indicates that no substitution should be performed (the
> existing path is passed through untouched). This is used when a flag
> (see below) needs to be applied without changing the path."
>
> Applying an R=301 flag in my cas
On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 00:15 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> Thanks Igor and Eric for your help. :) However, I'm not convinced
> that's the cause here. Below is a bare minimum example that shows the
> weird behavior I started with...
Sorry for replying to myself. Below is some more fodder gene
Thanks Igor and Eric for your help. :) However, I'm not convinced
that's the cause here. Below is a bare minimum example that shows the
weird behavior I started with...
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 09:34 +1000, Igor Cicimov wrote:
> Your 301 rule is wrong. As i said it should match the URI parth
> meani
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann
wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 08:28 +1000, Igor Cicimov wrote:
>> Your RewriteRule is wrong it works with the URI part only and not the
>> full URL. Read the mod_rewrite docos and correct your rule.
>
> Argh! An RTFM response. I probably deserve
Your 301 rule is wrong. As i said it should match the URI parth meaning the
part after the slash following the domain name and not the whole URL. So no
http:// in the rewrite rule hope this makes it more clear.
Sent from my phone
On May 7, 2010 8:48 AM, "Karsten Bräckelmann"
wrote:
On Fri, 2010
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 08:28 +1000, Igor Cicimov wrote:
> Your RewriteRule is wrong it works with the URI part only and not the
> full URL. Read the mod_rewrite docos and correct your rule.
Argh! An RTFM response. I probably deserve it. But...
I did read the docs. Lots of 'em. Still, I don't see w
Your RewriteRule is wrong it works with the URI part only and not the full
URL. Read the mod_rewrite docos and correct your rule.
Sent from my phone
On May 7, 2010 7:44 AM, "Karsten Bräckelmann"
wrote:
Please Cc me on every reply. I'm subscribed to the allow post list, but
I am not subscribed
Please Cc me on every reply. I'm subscribed to the allow post list, but
I am not subscribed to receive list posts. Can't stand yet another
mailing list at this point. ;)
Yes, I know mod_rewrite is voodoo. ;) Anyway, here's a (somewhat)
stripped down example of a case I really don't understand w
10/03/29 Henrik Gemal
> I use mod_rewrite and in the root of the website I have this
> in the .htaccess file:
Hi,
mixing Location with .htaccess sounds wrong to me, as Location
should be processed before URL-to-file mapping, but .htaccess can
only be accessed after URL-to-file mapping.
Be sure t
The problem is that if I do:
Order deny,allow
Deny from all
Order deny,allow
Allow from all
Order deny,allow
Deny from all
Allow from 127.0.0.1
then calling http://localhost/index.php/program2 would access program2
when he shouldn't
Your RewriteRule is wrong redirects everything to index.php in the root
directory where you dont have access
On Mar 29, 2010 8:24 PM, "Henrik Gemal" wrote:
I use mod_rewrite and in the root of the website I have this in the
.htaccess file:
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME
I use mod_rewrite and in the root of the website I have this in the
.htaccess file:
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ index.php?url=$1 [qsappend,last]
My index.php is simple:
My URLs are something lik
Hi Eric,
Yes, both are 1.3.
I don't have Apache2.pm -- the mod_perl2 module -- installed.
[r...@data2 ~]# perl -MApache2 -le 'print mod_perl->VERSION'
Can't locate Apache2.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /www/perl/
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.7/i686-linux /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.7
/usr/local/lib/perl5/
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Chris Brooks wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Thanks for the note. Both apache and mod_perl are up-to-date:
>
> [r...@data2 ~]# /usr/local/apache-perl/bin/httpd -v
> Server version: Apache/1.3.41 (Unix)
> Server built: Sep 2 2009 15:34:13
Both systems are 1.3?
--
Eric
Hi Eric,
Thanks for the note. Both apache and mod_perl are up-to-date:
[r...@data2 ~]# /usr/local/apache-perl/bin/httpd -v
Server version: Apache/1.3.41 (Unix)
Server built: Sep 2 2009 15:34:13
[r...@data2 ~]# perl -Mmod_perl -le 'print mod_perl->VERSION'
1.31
Thanks,
Chris
On Wed, Jan 27,
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Chris Brooks wrote:
> Good morning Apache list,
>
> I have a strange mod_rewrite problem, and I'm not sure how to solve it. I
> have a RewriteRule that works correctly on one apache daemon, but doesn't
> work when copied and pasted to the httpd.conf file of a sec
Good morning Krist,
Thank you very much for your reply.
No, I don't have any blocks in the httpd.conf, although this is a
mod_perl enabled apache daemon.
Thanks,
Chris
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Krist van Besien wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Chris Brooks wrote:
>
>
> > Any
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Chris Brooks wrote:
> Any suggestions as to what might be going on?
You are not using any sections by chance, are you?
Krist
--
krist.vanbes...@gmail.com
kr...@vanbesien.org
Bremgarten b. Bern, Switzerland
--
A: It reverses the normal flow of conversation.
Q
Good morning Apache list,
I have a strange mod_rewrite problem, and I'm not sure how to solve it. I
have a RewriteRule that works correctly on one apache daemon, but doesn't
work when copied and pasted to the httpd.conf file of a second apache
daemon.
To state this differently, on the second apa
We did testing on this over the weekend, the rewrite rule went live
Sunday night. As of this writing, there are a few minor issues not
related to the rewrite rule, they are related to moving files around
after the rewrite rule was tested. So this seems like a done deal.
Thank you to all who provi
> From: Reese [mailto:howel...@inkworkswell.com]
>
> >> I tried:
> >>
> >> RewriteEngine On
> >> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} subdomain\.domain\.ext
> >> RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/20\d+
> >> RewriteRule (.*)(0[5-9]).html$ /20$2/$1$2.html [R=301,L]
> >>
> >> For http://subdomain.domain.ext/fileDDMMY
On 09-Jan-10 14:29, Eric Covener wrote:
I tried:
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} subdomain\.domain\.ext
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/20\d+
RewriteRule (.*)(0[5-9]).html$ /20$2/$1$2.html [R=301,L]
For http://subdomain.domain.ext/fileDDMMYY.ext there was no effect,
that file loaded at
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Reese wrote:
> On 09-Jan-10 14:29, Eric Covener wrote:
>
>>> I tried:
>>>
>>> RewriteEngine On
>>> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} subdomain\.domain\.ext
>>> RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/20\d+
>>> RewriteRule (.*)(0[5-9]).html$ /20$2/$1$2.html [R=301,L]
>>>
>>> For http://
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Reese wrote:
> On 09-Jan-10 13:07, Eric Covener wrote:
>
>> To kill the looping:
>>
>> RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/20\d+
>
> I tried:
>
> RewriteEngine On
> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} subdomain\.domain\.ext
> RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/20\d+
> RewriteRule (.*)(0[5-
On 09-Jan-10 13:07, Eric Covener wrote:
To kill the looping:
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/20\d+
I tried:
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} subdomain\.domain\.ext
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/20\d+
RewriteRule (.*)(0[5-9]).html$ /20$2/$1$2.html [R=301,L]
For http://subdomain.domain.e
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Reese wrote:
> I said I would test this,
>
>> RewriteEngine On
>> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} subdomain\.domain\.ext
>> RewriteRule (.*)(0[5-6]).html$ /20$2/$1$2.html [R=301,L]
>
> Testing had mixed results.
>
> When this rule was at subdomain.domain.ext/sandbox/.h
I said I would test this,
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} subdomain\.domain\.ext
RewriteRule (.*)(0[5-6]).html$ /20$2/$1$2.html [R=301,L]
Testing had mixed results.
When this rule was at subdomain.domain.ext/sandbox/.htaccess
and the submitted url was
http://subdomain.domain.ext
On 07-Jan-10 13:08, Patrick Horgan wrote:
RewriteEngine Off
This says never mind, I didn't mean to hit the switch, let me turn it
back off and turn off the rewriting engine so no rewriting will be done
as httpd does it's job.
I grok. Now, I grok better. ;)
Reese
On 07-Jan-10 12:58, Tom Evans wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewriteengine
The first line is edifying:
"The RewriteEngine directive enables or disables the runtime rewriting
engine. If it is set to off this module does no runtime processing at
all. It does not eve
Reese wrote:
RewriteEngine On
This says, that I want part of the job of httpd is to do rewrites from
this instant until the server is stopped. It's as if a part of httpd is
just sitting there, able to do rewrites, but the switch for it is turned
off to save power if it's not going to be used
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Reese wrote:
> On 07-Jan-10 12:24, Tom Evans wrote:
>
>> "RewriteEngine Off" disables the rewrite engine, so that rewrite rules
>> are not applied. Seems unlikely that is what you intended.
>
> It would appear that, by removing the "RewriteEngine Off" line,
> the bi
On 07-Jan-10 12:24, Tom Evans wrote:
"RewriteEngine Off" disables the rewrite engine, so that rewrite rules
are not applied. Seems unlikely that is what you intended.
It would appear that, by removing the "RewriteEngine Off" line,
the bits on the prior 3 lines now work as expected and intended
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Reese wrote:
> Do X
> ...does X
> ...after doing X
> Stop doing X
>
> I'm missing something here. Maybe it's a terminology issue. Do you
> mean to say, the "RewriteEngine Off" directive cancels the Rewrites
> on earlier lines? On how many earlier lines? Etc.
>
It
On 07-Jan-10 12:24, Tom Evans wrote:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=bookend
Oh, thanks. I didn't know what shelfspace keepers were. @@
"RewriteEngine Off" disables the rewrite engine, so that rewrite rules
are not applied. Seems unlikely that is what you intended.
From that, I'd agree with you. My u
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Reese wrote:
> On 07-Jan-10 11:22, Eric Covener wrote:
>>
>> On 1/7/10, Reese wrote:
>>
>>> RewriteEngine On
>>> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} subdomain\.domain\.ext
>>> RewriteRule (.*)(0[5-6]).html$ /20$2/$1$2.html [R=301,L]
>>> RewriteEngine Off
>>
>> You don't b
On 07-Jan-10 11:22, Eric Covener wrote:
On 1/7/10, Reese wrote:
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} subdomain\.domain\.ext
RewriteRule (.*)(0[5-6]).html$ /20$2/$1$2.html [R=301,L]
RewriteEngine Off
You don't bookend your rules with on/off.
Meaning what, exactly? This is the only
On 1/7/10, Reese wrote:
> RewriteEngine On
> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} subdomain\.domain\.ext
> RewriteRule (.*)(0[5-6]).html$ /20$2/$1$2.html [R=301,L]
> RewriteEngine Off
You don't bookend your rules with on/off.
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
-
On 06-Jan-10 15:58, Reese wrote:
Hmmm. So adding more specificity, for years 2005-2009 and only for
the affected domain, this should work:
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} domain\.com
RewriteRule (.*)(0[5-9]).html$ /20$2/$1$2.html [R=301,L]
I'll test it.
It doesn't seem to be working. Testing for f
One more thing, it will work for this century only since 20xx is hard coded
in the rule. Thought should mention it although it's not going to be your
problem in 2100 haha
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Reese wrote:
> On 06-Jan-10 15:50, Patrick Horgan wrote:
>
> So adding RewriteCond %{HTTP_H
On 06-Jan-10 15:50, Patrick Horgan wrote:
So adding RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} domain\.com is needed, yes?
RewriteRule (.*)(0[0-9]).html$ /20$2/$1$2.html [R,L]
Hmmm. So adding more specificity, for years 2005-2009 and only for
the affected domain, this should work:
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST}
Reese wrote:
On 06-Jan-10 13:16, Reese wrote:
On 05-Jan-10 17:43, Igor Cicimov wrote:
You can try this
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule (.*)([0-9]{2}).html$ /20$2/$1$2.html [R,L]
I'm also not sure what would prevent this from becoming endlessly
recursive, since the domain/2005/file013105.html f
On 06-Jan-10 13:16, Reese wrote:
On 05-Jan-10 17:43, Igor Cicimov wrote:
You can try this
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule (.*)([0-9]{2}).html$ /20$2/$1$2.html [R,L]
I'm also not sure what would prevent this from becoming endlessly
recursive, since the domain/2005/file013105.html file may still
On 05-Jan-10 17:43, Igor Cicimov wrote:
You can try this
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule (.*)([0-9]{2}).html$ /20$2/$1$2.html [R,L]
I wrote it on the go and haven't tested it. It might be done in different
way probably but give this one a go and will see what can we do if it is not
working.
Okay
On 05-Jan-10 02:52, Boyle Owen wrote:
I am restructuring a Web site and need to move a number of files to
different subdirectories. The files have an embedded date code in
[filename]DDMMYY.ext format, I was hoping to hook the YY.ext portion
to redirect ...05.html files to the 2005/ subdirectory,
Boyle Owen wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Reese [mailto:howel...@inkworkswell.com]
> > Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 5:34 PM
> > To: users@httpd.apache.org
> > Subject: [us...@httpd] Mod_Rewrite voodoo
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Reese [mailto:howel...@inkworkswell.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 5:34 PM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [us...@httpd] Mod_Rewrite voodoo
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am restructuring a Web site and need to move a num
Hello everyone,
I am restructuring a Web site and need to move a number of files to
different subdirectories. The files have an embedded date code in
[filename]DDMMYY.ext format, I was hoping to hook the YY.ext portion
to redirect ...05.html files to the 2005/ subdirectory, ...06.html
files to th
You can use the following code to cache only .swf files:
Header set 604800 public must-revalidate
regards
Manoj
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:53:43 -0800
From: abap...@yahoo.com
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [us...@httpd] mod_rewrite + mod_headers :How to set Cache instructions
for
Header set Cache-Control "must-revalidate, proxy-revalidate"
Header set Pragma "public"
or use mod_headers commands per content (read the mod_headers instructions
on apache.org)
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:53 PM, ABAPGUY wrote:
> Hi Apache Experts,
> I wish to set 2 Cache statements for .swf
Hi Apache Experts,
I wish to set 2 Cache statements for .swf files (only) . I am rewriting using
mod_rewrite and have enabled mod_headers .
My 1st attempt did not work :
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} \.(swf)$ [NC]
Header set Cache-Control "must-revalidate, proxy-revalidate"
Header set Pragma "publi
happy that a very simple config exercise in
Apache was able to solve the problem.
- Original Message
From: Rich Bowen
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Fri, December 4, 2009 6:25:39 PM
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] mod_rewrite/rewriterule - forcing a HTTP 500 code on
all access at
Frank Z wrote:
is there a way via RewriteRule to force all access to a certain URL to return with a HTTP 500
e.g. i have a number 3 applications that are or will be obsoleted and is
expected to return a 500 to all callers who try to access it.
so when someone tries to access a deprecated URL
On Dec 4, 2009, at 20:25 , Frank Z wrote:
is there a way via RewriteRule to force all access to a certain URL
to return with a HTTP 500
e.g. i have a number 3 applications that are or will be obsoleted
and is expected to return a 500 to all callers who try to access it.
so when someone
On 5 Dec 2009, at 01:25, Frank Z wrote:
> is there a way via RewriteRule to force all access to a certain URL to return
> with a HTTP 500
>
> e.g. i have a number 3 applications that are or will be obsoleted and is
> expected to return a 500 to all callers who try to access it.
>
> so when
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
