Re: [us...@httpd] mod_filter newbie

2009-06-29 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 03:26:03PM -0700, Nick Kew wrote: > Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > > Both blocks work, but I'm thinking I could potentially end up calling > > gzdeflate on data that wasn't originally compressed. Maybe someone can > > clarify: > > Yep, your config looks OK to me. Where's the

Re: [us...@httpd] mod_filter newbie

2009-06-29 Thread Nick Kew
Ray Van Dolson wrote: Both blocks work, but I'm thinking I could potentially end up calling gzdeflate on data that wasn't originally compressed. Maybe someone can clarify: Yep, your config looks OK to me. Where's the problem compressing data that didn't start out compressed (or vice versa)?

[us...@httpd] mod_filter newbie

2009-06-29 Thread Ray Van Dolson
Hi all, I'm trying to replace some of my legacy AddOutputFilterByType configuration directives with the more flexible dynamic syntax. I have a reverse proxy set up in front of a server that is likely to provide gzip compressed data. I need to use mod_substitute to do a search and replace on the t