On 03/20/2010 01:26 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Jakov Sosic wrote:
>> On 03/20/2010 12:14 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>>
>>> authn_default stops you from falling through.
>>
>> So I should enable authn_default?
>
> try it and see. Someone probably got trigger-happy disa
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Jakov Sosic wrote:
> On 03/20/2010 12:14 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
>> authn_default stops you from falling through.
>
> So I should enable authn_default?
try it and see. Someone probably got trigger-happy disabling
"unneeded" modules in an effort to optimize your
On 03/20/2010 12:14 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> authn_default stops you from falling through.
So I should enable authn_default?
--
|Jakov Sosic|ICQ: 28410271| PGP: 0x965CAE2D |
=
| start fighting cancer -> http://
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 6:58 AM, Jakov Sosic wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This is the kind of authentication param I'm using:
>
>
> AllowOverride None
> AuthType Basic
> AuthName "Admin"
> AuthUserFile /etc/httpd/myauthfile
> Require valid-user
>
>
> I've disabled all the auth modules except these two:
Hi.
This is the kind of authentication param I'm using:
AllowOverride None
AuthType Basic
AuthName "Admin"
AuthUserFile /etc/httpd/myauthfile
Require valid-user
I've disabled all the auth modules except these two:
authn_file_module (shared)
authz_host_module (shared)
Now, when I r
antoine wrote:
Hello everyone ,
I have a project where i want to add a new phase between the content
generation
and the logging phase of a request.
In other words i want after the response is generated and ready to be
sent to the client
to manipulate the html produced code (do my stuff) and
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:54 PM, antoine wrote:
>
> My friend who works in the same project has done this with filters (i think)
> but we are looking for
> a faster way (maybe a new module enabled after the content generation).
I think anything but a filter is a complete dead end.
--
Eric Coven
Hello everyone ,
I have a project where i want to add a new phase between the content
generation
and the logging phase of a request.
In other words i want after the response is generated and ready to be
sent to the client
to manipulate the html produced code (do my stuff) and then send it to
Boyle Owen wrote:
> If you just load modules but don't actually use them (ie, no directives
> in config), then no.
That is not entirely true. Most register a hook provider to evaluate if
they are the candidate for providing auth, injecting filters or handling
the request.
Those hooks do cost som
nima chavooshi wrote:
Hi
I have one question about Apache modules.with loading more modules on
apache, may apache responses with more delay ??
Re these recent threads :
- [us...@httpd] Apache under DOS
- [us...@httpd] apache monitoring
- [us...@httpd] apache modules
It is always a good idea
If you just load modules but don't actually use them (ie, no directives
in config), then no.
From: nima chavooshi [mailto:nima0...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 8:59 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [us...@
Hi
I have one question about Apache modules.with loading more modules on
apache, may apache responses with more delay ??
--
N.Chavoshi
12 matches
Mail list logo
