On 04.12.2010 00:49, Igor Galić wrote:
- "Jeroen Geilman" wrote:
On 12/01/2010 07:38 PM, ma...@manfbraun.de wrote:
Because the timestamp does not contain milliseconds, how can I
determine, which request was the first? Would it help me, just
to subtract the processing-time?
Probably no
- "Jeroen Geilman" wrote:
> On 12/01/2010 07:38 PM, ma...@manfbraun.de wrote:
> > Hello !
> >
> > I am just using this to log:
> >
> > LogFormat \
> > "%{%F %T}t\t%v\t%p\t%h\t%{User-Agent} ... \
> > vhost_combined2
> >
> > CustomLog "|/usr/bin/mono /test/eco.exe /var/log/apache2/extr
On 12/01/2010 07:38 PM, ma...@manfbraun.de wrote:
Hello !
I am just using this to log:
LogFormat \
"%{%F %T}t\t%v\t%p\t%h\t%{User-Agent} ... \
vhost_combined2
CustomLog "|/usr/bin/mono /test/eco.exe /var/log/apache2/extra_log 86400" \
vhost_combined2
Okay.
May I
Hello !
I am just using this to log:
LogFormat \
"%{%F %T}t\t%v\t%p\t%h\t%{User-Agent} ... \
vhost_combined2
CustomLog "|/usr/bin/mono /test/eco.exe /var/log/apache2/extra_log 86400" \
vhost_combined2
May I use just a named pipe? What will happen, it the reader has a sho