RE: [us...@httpd] Name based virtual host bug after Apache restart

2010-01-13 Thread Chirouze Olivier
org > Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Name based virtual host bug after > Apache restart > > > - the actual servername that bugs is of the form > > www.aservername.co.za (something with the double country > extension?? - we do > > have other servers of the form .co.uk, co.il,

Re: [us...@httpd] Name based virtual host bug after Apache restart

2010-01-13 Thread Eric Covener
> - the actual servername that bugs is of the form > www.aservername.co.za (something with the double country extension?? - we do > have other servers of the form .co.uk, co.il, etc and they work as expected) > - note that a serveralias in the same virtualhost still works: in fact, it's > ServerNa

Re: [us...@httpd] Name based virtual host bug after Apache restart

2010-01-13 Thread Eric Covener
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Chirouze Olivier wrote: > Hi Tom, thanks for the so prompt answer! > > I didn't know that option of httpd, looks interesting. > As of today, the vhost goes to the appropriate file (according to the DUMP > VHOST). But I would use that same command when it fails ag

RE: [us...@httpd] Name based virtual host bug after Apache restart

2010-01-13 Thread Chirouze Olivier
e are listening on different IPs and that is why we need to specify it in the vhost config. Olivier > -Original Message- > From: Tom Evans [mailto:tevans...@googlemail.com] > Sent: 13 January 2010 15:47 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Name based vi

Re: [us...@httpd] Name based virtual host bug after Apache restart

2010-01-13 Thread Tom Evans
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Chirouze Olivier wrote: > Hi, > > After some years out of the Apache discussion, I'm back for a quite specific > question... ;-) > > We have been running Apache HTTP Server 2.0 for some years now. Everything > works fine as expected but I think we encounter somethi

[us...@httpd] Name based virtual host bug after Apache restart

2010-01-13 Thread Chirouze Olivier
Hi, After some years out of the Apache discussion, I'm back for a quite specific question... ;-) We have been running Apache HTTP Server 2.0 for some years now. Everything works fine as expected but I think we encounter something that can only be a bug. We are using _name based virtual hosts_