Re: [us...@httpd] Name-based virtual hosting SSL (seems to work)

2010-07-01 Thread Scott Whitney
Thanks, Eric. I'm a little confused. I _think_ you're saying that the vhost-scope configuration _for the SSL Certificate stuff only_ will be served up to all, but the remaining directives (Directory, FastCGI stuff, etc) will be on a per NVH basis? At least those are the results that I'm seeing

Re: [us...@httpd] Name-based virtual hosting SSL (seems to work)

2010-07-01 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >> >> Am I missing something? I'm using the same certificate for all sites. The >> statement is very clear that this cannot and will not work, but it seems to >> be working for me. >> >> Can someone elucidate? > > The FAQ for that release should

Re: [us...@httpd] Name-based virtual hosting SSL (seems to work)

2010-07-01 Thread Eric Covener
> > Am I missing something? I'm using the same certificate for all sites. The > statement is very clear that this cannot and will not work, but it seems to > be working for me. > > Can someone elucidate? The FAQ for that release should say that the vhost-scope SSL configuration of the first-listed

[us...@httpd] Name-based virtual hosting SSL (seems to work)

2010-07-01 Thread Scott Whitney
I've read this: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/ssl/ssl_faq.html#vhosts and it seems to state that this: AddHandler fastcgi-script .fcgi .fcg .fpl .py .pyc DocumentRoot /home/eggs/jt/pi/www/htdocs ServerName eggs.test.mycompany.com FastCgiExternalServer /home/eggs/jt/pi/pylib -host 127.0