Nick Kew wrote:
>> I agree with the above. I started this thread to make people aware of
>> it's existance and to provoke discussion on the matter.
>
> Yep, someone posted it a week or so back.
Yeah, me.
>> However, if someone were to take up the reigns and begin
>> developing an Apache mo
Mike Cardwell wrote:
I agree with the above. I started this thread to make people aware of
it's existance and to provoke discussion on the matter.
Yep, someone posted it a week or so back.
However, if
someone were to take up the reigns and begin developing an Apache module
for it using th
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Mike Cardwell
wrote:
> Brian Mearns wrote:
>
Just curious to know whether Google announcement on SPDY
http://blog.chromium.org/2009/11/2x-faster-web.html needs change only in
Apache web server side or even needs change in application point
Brian Mearns wrote:
Just curious to know whether Google announcement on SPDY
http://blog.chromium.org/2009/11/2x-faster-web.html needs change only in
Apache web server side or even needs change in application point of view
also. Sorry to spam you guys .
Both the server and
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Mike Cardwell
wrote:
> Kamaraj, Jayakumar wrote:
>
>> Just curious to know whether Google announcement on SPDY
>> http://blog.chromium.org/2009/11/2x-faster-web.html needs change only in
>> Apache web server side or even needs change in application poin
Kamaraj, Jayakumar wrote:
Just curious to know whether Google announcement on SPDY
http://blog.chromium.org/2009/11/2x-faster-web.html needs change only in
Apache web server side or even needs change in application point of view
also.
Sorry to spam you guys .
Both the s
Hi,
Just curious to know whether Google announcement on SPDY
http://blog.chromium.org/2009/11/2x-faster-web.html needs change only in
Apache web server side or even needs change in application point of view
also.
Sorry to spam you guys .
Thanks,
Jai
---
