Even we thought of this (using apr_thread_create) initially, but later
realized that we can't achive time-bound functionality with this, similar to
what we've in Windows - WaitForSingleObject().
Thanks,
PR
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:23 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 9/1/2010 6:12 AM, Pravesh
On 9/1/2010 6:12 AM, Pravesh Rai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Observed that, if we use following set of functions:
>
> subrequest = ap_sub_req_lookup_uri( webapp->sChpUrl, r, r->output_filters );
> ap_run_sub_req( subrequest );
> ap_rflush( subrequest );
> ap_destroy_sub_req( subrequest );
>
> in a thread
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:42:13 +0530
Pravesh Rai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Observed that, if we use following set of functions:
>
> subrequest = ap_sub_req_lookup_uri( webapp->sChpUrl, r, r->output_filters );
> ap_run_sub_req( subrequest );
> ap_rflush( subrequest );
> ap_destroy_sub_req( subrequest );
>
Hi,
Observed that, if we use following set of functions:
subrequest = ap_sub_req_lookup_uri( webapp->sChpUrl, r, r->output_filters );
ap_run_sub_req( subrequest );
ap_rflush( subrequest );
ap_destroy_sub_req( subrequest );
in a thread [using CreateThread() on Windows OS], every execution of thes
