Re: [us...@httpd] Canonical ignores port

2009-07-14 Thread rank1seeker
Then in 2.2, presence of UseCanonicalPhysicalPort, should remove optional port argument of ServerName. As it behaves unexpectedly. Thanx - Original Message - From: Sander Temme To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:33:19 -0700 Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Canonical

Re: [us...@httpd] Canonical ignores port

2009-07-14 Thread Sander Temme
On Jul 14, 2009, at 3:24 PM, Marcin 'Rambo' Roguski wrote: SERVER_PORT gets value from ServerName no matter what value of UseCanonicalName is Workaround is to not set a port in ServerName Is this a bug? You're missing Port directive. Port is no longer in httpd 2.x. But try to play with

Re: [us...@httpd] Canonical ignores port

2009-07-14 Thread Marcin 'Rambo' Roguski
> SERVER_PORT gets value from ServerName no matter what value of > UseCanonicalName is > Workaround is to not set a port in ServerName > > > Is this a bug? You're missing Port directive. - The official User-To-User support for

[us...@httpd] Canonical ignores port

2009-07-14 Thread rank1seeker
UseCanonicalName On ServerName LIMPETstarforce.biz:69 --- Result: SERVER_NAME = LIMPETstarforce.biz SERVER_PORT = 69 UseCanonicalName Off ServerName LIMPETstarforce.biz:69 --- Result