xPostings wrote:
> Hi Williams
>
> I understand your argument. But in my case I would like to compile libssl
> into the httpd because of the criticial SSL/TLS vulnerability. Why that?
> The answer is easy: Because I can only control the installed httpd but not
> the installation of the debian boxe
cht-
> Von: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 2. Januar 2009 15:48
> An: users@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [us...@httpd] Can't compile libssl and libz into httpd
> 2.2.11
>
>
> xPostings wrote:
> >
> > I really do
xPostings wrote:
>
> I really don't know if it's only a config problem on my side or
> if it's a change from apache 2.2.8 to 2.2.11:
> How can I compile httpd WITHOUT any linkings to libssl and libz
> (that means compile it into httpd). Also the httpd 2.2.8 is bigger
> in filesize than 2.2.11 (bac
Hi
I really don't know if it's only a config problem on my side or
if it's a change from apache 2.2.8 to 2.2.11:
How can I compile httpd WITHOUT any linkings to libssl and libz
(that means compile it into httpd). Also the httpd 2.2.8 is bigger
in filesize than 2.2.11 (bacause libz and libssl is no
