Re: [us...@httpd] Application design

2009-03-20 Thread Nick Kew
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:17:13 -0400 Brian Mearns wrote: > > I'm not sure content-transfer-encoding is the right header, I think > just Content-encoding is what you want. Otherwise, that should work I > think, but it requires that people's browsers support zip encoding, > which mine, for instance

RE: [us...@httpd] Application design

2009-03-20 Thread Jorge Medina
But I would argue that disk space is cheaper than decompressing files on the server for every request. 8-) -Original Message- From: Brian Mearns [mailto:mearn...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 11:17 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org; a...@ice-sa.com Subject: Re: [us...@httpd

Re: [us...@httpd] Application design

2009-03-20 Thread Brian Mearns
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:46 AM, André Warnier wrote: > Hi. > > For once, I'd like to pump the collective knowledge and accumulated wisdom > of the gurus on the list. > > I run a document management application, from which users can retrieve > documents (ms-office, pdf, etc..) through a web appli

[us...@httpd] Application design

2009-03-20 Thread André Warnier
Hi. For once, I'd like to pump the collective knowledge and accumulated wisdom of the gurus on the list. I run a document management application, from which users can retrieve documents (ms-office, pdf, etc..) through a web application. From the user point of view, documents are accessed vi