o say
17Mb. Certainly better than my previous setup.
I'll monitor over the next week and see if it stays at that level.
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Marsh [mailto:adrian.ma...@ubiquisys.com]
Sent: 07 April 2009 14:23
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [us...@httpd] Apa
an my previous setup.
I'll monitor over the next week and see if it stays at that level.
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Marsh [mailto:adrian.ma...@ubiquisys.com]
Sent: 07 April 2009 14:23
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
Thanks guys for the h
gt;
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 07 April 2009 01:50
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Sean Conner wrote:
>> It was thus said that t
see if the problem still occurs. If it does, then I
may have an official support route to follow.
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 April 2009 01:50
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
On Mon, Apr 6, 20
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 7:31 AM, André Warnier wrote:
>>
>> The wasted stack space doesn't shows up as a high VSZ, but not RSS.
>>
> Eric, as written that note above is rather cryptic..
> Maybe removing double/triple negatives would help ?
> ;-)
Lost all meaning in an edit, strike the "doesn't".
Eric Covener wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Sean Conner wrote:
It was thus said that the Great Eric Covener once stated:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Adrian Marsh
wrote:
Am trying MaxMemFree 3(30mb? - pure guess number).
Far too large, it's per-thread. Try 1MB.
This tr
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Sean Conner wrote:
> It was thus said that the Great Eric Covener once stated:
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Adrian Marsh
>> wrote:
>> > Am trying MaxMemFree 3 (30mb? - pure guess number).
>>
>> Far too large, it's per-thread. Try 1MB.
>
> This trigge
It was thus said that the Great Eric Covener once stated:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Adrian Marsh
> wrote:
> > Am trying MaxMemFree 3 (30mb? - pure guess number).
>
> Far too large, it's per-thread. Try 1MB.
This triggered something I recently learned---what threading model are
: 03 April 2009 16:51
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Adrian Marsh
wrote:
> Am trying MaxMemFree 3 (30mb? - pure guess number).
Far too large, it's per-thread. Try 1MB.
--
Eric Covener
cove...@g
.
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Tom Evans [mailto:tevans...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 03 April 2009 16:21
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 14:24 +0100, Adrian Marsh wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Well, at the moment the ser
httpd
-Original Message-
From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
Sent: 03 April 2009 16:51
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Adrian Marsh
wrote:
> Am trying MaxMemFree 3 (30mb? - pure guess number).
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Adrian Marsh
wrote:
> Am trying MaxMemFree 3 (30mb? - pure guess number).
Far too large, it's per-thread. Try 1MB.
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
-
The official User-To-User support f
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 14:24 +0100, Adrian Marsh wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Well, at the moment the servers running very low on available memory:
>
> Mem: 12307068k total, 12121380k used, 185688k free, 286808k buffers
> Swap: 2031608k total,0k used, 2031608k free, 11081692k cached
>
> He
[mailto:tevans...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 03 April 2009 15:46
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: AW: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 16:21 +0200, Alessandro Fantuzzi wrote:
> This thread confirms that apache by default doesnt free memory when
> stopped.
> http://marc.info/
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 16:21 +0200, Alessandro Fantuzzi wrote:
> This thread confirms that apache by default doesnt free memory when
> stopped.
> http://marc.info/?l=apache-modules&m=108080705806751&w=2
>
> We have a memory leak problem too, still we havent solved.
>
> We havent svn onthe server
is much lower.
*Von:* Alessandro Fantuzzi [mailto:fantu...@o-one.net]
*Gesendet:* Freitag, 3. April 2009 15:46
*An:* users@httpd.apache.org
*Betreff:* Re: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
About the fact that stopping Apache doesnt fr
bject: Re: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Adrian Marsh
wrote:
> To get that memory back I have to reboot the server.
As a previous poster said, if stopping Apache (and watching all the
httpd process go away) doesn't reclaim the memory, then you're lo
xtern) [mailto:christian.dom...@iz.bwl.de]
Sent: 03 April 2009 14:57
To: users@httpd.apache.org; a...@ice-sa.com
Subject: AW: AW: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
This is only true, if you dont have a real memory leak.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Gesendet: Freit
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Adrian Marsh wrote:
> To get that memory back I have to reboot the server.
As a previous poster said, if stopping Apache (and watching all the
httpd process go away) doesn't reclaim the memory, then you're looking
at the wrong numbers.
Tried MaxMemFree or MaxRequ
This is only true, if you dont have a real memory leak.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 3. April 2009 15:55
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
Domsch, Christian (IZLBW Extern) wrote:
>
Domsch, Christian (IZLBW Extern) wrote:
Hmm,
I can't agree with your opinion. The thing is here, that when the apache server is shutdown and restarted the memory is not freed and so the httpd processes get the out of memory errors much more quickly because the amount of free memory is much lowe
lower.
Von: Alessandro Fantuzzi [mailto:fantu...@o-one.net]
Gesendet: Freitag, 3. April 2009 15:46
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
About the fact that stopping Apache doesnt free the memory, I wanted to point
out that our sysadmin told us this is due t
ginal Message-
From: Domsch, Christian (IZLBW Extern) [mailto:christian.dom...@iz.bwl.de]
Sent: 03 April 2009 14:23
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: AW: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
Hello.
A client of our company has similar issues. They run SLES 10 with apache 2.2.x
and the newest subve
: 03 April 2009 14:43
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: AW: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
Hi Adrian,
no they didn't resolve these problems yet. In fact they don't know which part
exactly is causing it.
The thing with ssl is that due to security reasons disabling of ssl is no
quisys.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 3. April 2009 15:26
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: RE: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
Hi Christian,
Do you think you could ask them to see if they resolved it?
I had similar thoughts, so in my VMware copy I tried various things, including
working without
gs,
> including working without SSL, but I didn't see the results get any better.
>
> Adrian
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Domsch, Christian (IZLBW Extern) [mailto:christian.dom...@iz.bwl.de]
> Sent: 03 April 2009 14:23
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject
xtern) [mailto:christian.dom...@iz.bwl.de]
Sent: 03 April 2009 14:23
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: AW: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
Hello.
A client of our company has similar issues. They run SLES 10 with apache 2.2.x
and the newest subversion 1.5.x and also use https. For authentication
. April 2009 15:23
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: AW: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
Hello.
A client of our company has similar issues. They run SLES 10 with apache 2.2.x
and the newest subversion 1.5.x and also use https. For authentication they use
winbind and not ldap.
They too have the
al Message-
From: Tom Evans [mailto:tevans...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 03 April 2009 14:16
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Cc: a...@ice-sa.com
Subject: RE: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 13:58 +0100, Adrian Marsh wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> Thanks for the reply. No its d
Nachricht-
Von: Tom Evans [mailto:tevans...@googlemail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 3. April 2009 15:16
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Cc: a...@ice-sa.com
Betreff: RE: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 13:58 +0100, Adrian Marsh wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> Thanks for the repl
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 13:58 +0100, Adrian Marsh wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> Thanks for the reply. No its definitely the httpd process. I see each thread
> consuming hundreds of megs of RES memory being used in TOP. I just restarted
> it and already each is consuming:
>
> 10006 apache15 0 27
ssage-
From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
Sent: 03 April 2009 14:06
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Adrian Marsh wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> Thanks for the reply. No its definitely the httpd process. I s
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Adrian Marsh wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> Thanks for the reply. No its definitely the httpd process. I see each thread
> consuming hundreds of megs of RES memory being used in TOP. I just restarted
> it and already each is consuming:
>
> 10006 apache 15 0 279m
(as others
running 1.5.5 don't report this issue). It's a fairly vanilla httpd setup
other than the svn config.
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: 03 April 2009 10:37
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Apache
Adrian Marsh wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to track down an issue I have with our apache server. Its a
poweredge 1800, RHEL5x64 server, running httpd-2.2.3-22.el5. Its mainly
used as a subversion repository, via HTTPS with LDAP lookup for
authentication.
All was well with the system, running
Hi,
I'm trying to track down an issue I have with our apache server. Its a
poweredge 1800, RHEL5x64 server, running httpd-2.2.3-22.el5. Its mainly
used as a subversion repository, via HTTPS with LDAP lookup for
authentication.
All was well with the system, running 1Gb of ram, until I did
36 matches
Mail list logo