the PR with the test results
-ascs
-Message d'origine-
De : KOZMAN Bálint [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mercredi 9 janvier 2008 11:12
? : users@httpd.apache.org
Objet : RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and keepalive question
That's scary. Thanks for your help anyway.
À : users@httpd.apache.org
Objet : RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and keepalive question
That's scary. Thanks for your help anyway.
Cheers,
Balint
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Axel-Stephane SMORGRAV wrote:
> I'm sorry, but I did not realise that you were attempting to use SSL to t
-
De : KOZMAN Bálint [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mercredi 9 janvier 2008 00:28
? : users@httpd.apache.org
Objet : RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and keepalive question
This tells me that it's not possible to use persistent connections to https
backends in proxy workers, which is st
et : RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and keepalive question
This tells me that it's not possible to use persistent connections to https
backends in proxy workers, which is strange, as it seemed to be possible in
apache 2.0 mod_proxy. Is this correct or I've
int [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mardi 8 janvier 2008 16:45
? : users@httpd.apache.org
Objet : [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and keepalive question
Hi there,
I'm experiencing a different behaviour of apache 2.2's mod_proxy compared to the one in 2.0. From
my point of view the main differenc
how_bug.cgi?id=43308
-ascs
-Message d'origine-
De : KOZMAN Bálint [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mardi 8 janvier 2008 16:45
À : users@httpd.apache.org
Objet : [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and keepalive question
Hi there,
I'm experiencing a different behaviour of apache 2.
Hi there,
I'm experiencing a different behaviour of apache 2.2's mod_proxy compared to
the one in 2.0. From my point of view the main difference is that 2.0 mod_proxy
does not send the "Connection" request header to the backend, while 2.2
mod_proxy always sends "Connection: Close" regardles
