Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy: 302 redirect makes Apache ignore some headers

On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > Upgrade. 2.0.x mod_proxy is ancient and had lots of bugs. Correct > handling of response headers was fixed just over a year ago (though > that was principally down to protocol niceties, and I think cookies > in 2.2 may have been fixed much earlie

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy: 302 redirect makes Apache ignore some headers

Martijn Grooten wrote: Hello. I am running an Apache 2.0.52 web server that forwards most requests to a non-Apache back-end server using mod_proxy. This works fine in most cases. However, when the back-end server sends a 302 redirect response, Apache ignores some headers when forwarding this res

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy: 302 redirect makes Apache ignore some headers

Hello. I am running an Apache 2.0.52 web server that forwards most requests to a non-Apache back-end server using mod_proxy. This works fine in most cases. However, when the back-end server sends a 302 redirect response, Apache ignores some headers when forwarding this response to the client. In p

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy sends reverse proxy request twice

On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:20:56 -0700 "Ryan Warnick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It looks like for Apache 2.2.10 on Windows, mod_proxy sends reverse > proxy requests twice. I've verified this using two different packet > sniffers. I also tracked the problem to the 'WSAsend' winsock call. > If you

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy sends reverse proxy request twice

It looks like for Apache 2.2.10 on Windows, mod_proxy sends reverse proxy requests twice. I've verified this using two different packet sniffers. I also tracked the problem to the 'WSAsend' winsock call. If you alter the APR to use the 'send' winsock API call instead of the WSAsend call, then th

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_Proxy and 100-Continue

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's section 8.2.3 of RFC2616. But anyway, I don't see why > use the early keyword. As mentioned earlier, I'm not actually using mod_headers or the early keyword at all, I was using it to demonstrate the issue with mod_prox

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_Proxy and 100-Continue

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:00:56 -0400 "Tom Wells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe it's not a bug, but it certainly is inconsistent - and certainly > something has has changed between the versions - so I wanted to > highlight this. You're right. Sorry if I came across a bit grumpy. Anyway, I thi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_Proxy and 100-Continue

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:50:00 -0400 > "Tom Wells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The "early" keyword exists to help developers simulate > a request, for example when debugging a new module. > Perhaps it should've remained undo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_Proxy and 100-Continue

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:50:00 -0400 "Tom Wells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ServerName munchkin.synthesis.co.za > Header add Set-Cookie "MOD_PROXY_FOOD=FOO;" early Why? The "early" keyword exists to help developers simulate a request, for example when debugging a new module. Perhaps it shou

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_Proxy and 100-Continue

Hi Group I'm fairly confident I've found a bug in mod_proxy in Apache 2.2.9 but would like your opinion before I log anything to the bug tracker. It's something I discovered while working in mod_python, but I've managed to get it occurring with a bare-bones Apache 2.2.9 setup using only mod_proxy

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mod_proxy] problem

Sorry all I forgot greetings ! hello all :) On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:13:49 +0200, GanGan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have two Apache server > one that answers to this url: https://192.168.1.110/ocsreport/ > the other answers to this address: http://192.168.2.215 > > the server 192.168.2.215

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mod_proxy] problem

I have two Apache server one that answers to this url: https://192.168.1.110/ocsreport/ the other answers to this address: http://192.168.2.215 the server 192.168.2.215 have mod_proxy and that he would like to redirect all requests it receives at https://192.168.1.110/ocsreport/ how can i do ?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy disableReuse

I use DisableReuse with mod_proxy in ProxyPass but, I can't restart apache, put next line in httpd.conf but not start Proxypass / /apache DisableReuse=On Error don't exist parameter thanks

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and disconnections

On Monday 28 July 2008 11:04:36 Kristian Rink wrote: > Folks; > > dealing with this issue again; yet not really being capable of resolving > it. Maybe someone does have some more ideas on that. Scenario: > > - apache 2.2 (Ubuntu 8.04) as reverse proxy in front of a glassfish v2 > application server

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and disconnections

Folks; dealing with this issue again; yet not really being capable of resolving it. Maybe someone does have some more ideas on that. Scenario: - apache 2.2 (Ubuntu 8.04) as reverse proxy in front of a glassfish v2 application server (seems to be unrelated to the latter one, though, same issue app

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy reverse and Browser Detect

Hello all-  I have a rev. proxy running, which pretty much aggregates many sites to a common base url. I am having an issue with regard to browser detection. It happens just fine when I hit a vhost for the particular site, but not when I go through the reverse. Is there something I'm missing tha

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy, mod_proxy_balancer

Ok, now i gured out, that something like: ProxyPass /special-directory1 http://host1 ProxyPass /special-directory2 http://host2 ProxyPass / balancer://hotcluster/ # The below is the hot standby BalancerMember http://host1 BalancerMember http://host2 should do the trick. Correct? Jérôme

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy, mod_proxy_balancer

Jérôme Patt schrieb: Hello there, I'm using a bunch of Apache-Worker as proxys (modules proxy_balancer_module, proxy_http_module, proxy_module), with two parent servers. The parent servers are holding the content, which is redundant till now on both servers. At the moment, there is this direc

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy, mod_proxy_balancer

Hello there, I'm using a bunch of Apache-Worker as proxys (modules proxy_balancer_module, proxy_http_module, proxy_module), with two parent servers. The parent servers are holding the content, which is redundant till now on both servers. At the moment, there is this directive in the apache2.co

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy: pass request body failed

Hi, can someone help me to understand what the following error message means? [Mon Jul 14 15:47:12 2008] [error] (104)Connection reset by peer: proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.1:84 (localhost) from 87.xxx.yyy.zzz () I'm using apache witch mod_proxy and mod_ssl as an SSL frontend for

[EMAIL PROTECTED] MOD_PROXY a strange problem!!!

Hi, I have a TCP client-server application written in Java using the standard socket APIs. Now, I want to introduce Apache as the proxy server between them. And hence I am using the mod_proxy module. The communication among client, apache and server is properly being established but facing a

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy: Proxy sends double requests to backend server

Hi all, I've encountered a very strange problem. I wanted to configure a proxy, but for some reason, it sends request twice to the backend server, and it usually results in a "400 Bad Request" response. With a program, I've recorded an example of a dummy request. 17:39:37 < GET / HTTP/1.1 17:39:3

[EMAIL PROTECTED] MOD_PROXY not working!!!

Hi, I am working on mod_proxy module for Apache 2.2.8. My client is sending 5 HTTP messages to Apache. It is expected that the Apache will forward those messages to actual server. But, Apache just forwards the first message. Here is the message printed on server console: POST / HTTP/1.1 Hos

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and preservehosts

Hi I am running "multiple" web sites on my server, and I need for the backing application(tomcat) to be able to see which domain the user are coming from. So I have the below configuration. It seems that the first request goes well. But every subsequent request gets the sub url appended so i

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy submodules

I'm looking for a list of the mod_proxy submodules but have come up empty in my searches. Can anyone point me to one? Mathew -- Keep up with my goings on at http://feeds.feedburner.com/theillien_atom - The official User-To-Use

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy create a new socket for each proxied request

After I updated apache server from 2.0 to 2.2, I noticed that reverse proxy does not work as in older version of apache (2.0). In older version the backend socket will be reused for http keepalive connection. In the newer version 2.2.8, I noticed that the mod_proxy is creating a new socket each

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy - "proxy" aware?

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Chris Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Our webservers sit behind proxy servers. One one of the web servers, > I'm trying to use "mod_proxy" to proxy content from outside of our > network. Can mod_proxy be made aware of the actual proxy servers we > hav

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy - "proxy" aware?

Chris Franks wrote: Hi, Our webservers sit behind proxy servers. One one of the web servers, I'm trying to use "mod_proxy" to proxy content from outside of our network. Can mod_proxy be made aware of the actual proxy servers we have? I'm trying to proxy secure content over https and have the

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy - "proxy" aware?

Hi, Our webservers sit behind proxy servers. One one of the web servers, I'm trying to use "mod_proxy" to proxy content from outside of our network. Can mod_proxy be made aware of the actual proxy servers we have? I'm trying to proxy secure content over https and have the following in my ssl.co

AW: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy limit session

, 17. April 2008 20:46 An: users@httpd.apache.org Betreff: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy limit session Hi there, I try to figure out if there is a way to limit the amount of active sessions when using mod_proxy with sticky bit. I've found the max and smax param which allows to limit the connec

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy limit session

Hi there, I try to figure out if there is a way to limit the amount of active sessions when using mod_proxy with sticky bit. I've found the max and smax param which allows to limit the connections, but it does not limit the amount of concurrent sessions. Thanks for any help or hint Regards,

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy, ssl and detecting secure requests on the server side

I've setup mod_proxy and mod_ssl successfully and have Tomcat configured to run on 8080 and 8443 (for SSL). If I proxy requests from /jobs -> http://localhost:8080/jobs, request.isSecure() will returns false on the server side if I request https://localhost/jobs. If I change it to /jobs -> https:/

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy performance with apache 2.2

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Skye Poier Nott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I originally discovered the problem because the initial "fill" of > mod_disk_cache from the origin server was taking forever. The stats I > list below are with mod_proxy only (mod_cache is loaded, but not > enabled fo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy performance with apache 2.2

I originally discovered the problem because the initial "fill" of mod_disk_cache from the origin server was taking forever. The stats I list below are with mod_proxy only (mod_cache is loaded, but not enabled for any host) Skye On 19-Mar-08, at 3:07 PM, Robert Anderson wrote: I had a sim

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy performance with apache 2.2

I had a similar issue that was caused by caching. Do you have mod_cache or mod_disk_cache active? are they clearing properly? Regards, Robert Anderson B2B ECS TORONTO 17 Gormley Rd. W. Richmond Hill, ON, L4

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy performance with apache 2.2

Hi Joshua, I've tried changing MaxClients from 256 to 512 to 1024, no effect. I've tried changing from MPM prefork to worker, and twiddled threads per child, no effect. Just can't seem to get more than about 4 Mbit/sec out of the origin. I'll give dev@ a ping. Thanks, Skye On 19-Mar-08

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy performance with apache 2.2

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Skye Poier Nott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am doing some load testing on a reverse proxy with apache 2.2 + > mod_proxy and I'm getting terrible throughput, I was wondering if > anyone had a suggestion. > > I have the following config, all on gigabit

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy performance with apache 2.2

Hi, I am doing some load testing on a reverse proxy with apache 2.2 + mod_proxy and I'm getting terrible throughput, I was wondering if anyone had a suggestion. I have the following config, all on gigabit ethernet: 1 origin server -> 2 mod_proxy servers -> 4 client simulators (flood) The

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy socket-timeout?

Hello, I would like to know if there is a possibility to set a socket timeout (no tcp handshake possible, when host is down) and a different application timeout (tcp handshake complete but backend server/application is slow). The reason i ask is i would like to have a fast reaction when one of t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and basic authentication

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Steffen Wieschalla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > my used httpd is Apache 1.3.37 under Solaris 10 (Sparc). > > I want to configure it to be a proxy for another system but the access > must be limited with a method like basic authentication. > > My current

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and basic authentication

Hi, my used httpd is Apache 1.3.37 under Solaris 10 (Sparc). I want to configure it to be a proxy for another system but the access must be limited with a method like basic authentication. My current configuration looks like this: [snip] ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] DocumentRoot /usr/l

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy report "DNS lookup failure" when combined mod_proxy and mod_rewrite

Hi Joshua, thanks for your reply. I am not very familiar with mod_rewrite. I think I should be familiar with it first. I'll search some docs. Thanks. Robert. On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Rober

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy delay detecting application restart

Hi Vincent, Since I was targeting Apache 2.0.*, I didn't even check the 2.2 docs, so I missed the "retry" parameter. I tried your advice on OS X Leopard that actually has HTTPD 2.2, and it worked nicely. Now need to figure out how to upgrade my other servers... Thanks Andrus On Feb 26,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy delay detecting application restart

On 25/02/2008, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a way to > configure a smaller refresh interval or avoid instance status caching > all together? Try this: ProxyPass /myapp/ http://localhost:8105/myapp/ retry=5 I don't know if that's right but the docs suggest it is. http

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy delay detecting application restart

Using HTTPD 2.0.x on OS X and Linux, with mod_proxy setup as a frontend for a dozen of Java applications (Jetty server instances more specifically) running on the same machine as HTTPD. mod_proxy config for each Java instance looks similar to this: ProxyPass /myapp/ http://localhost:8105

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy report "DNS lookup failure" when combined mod_proxy and mod_rewrite

On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Robert Balabalame <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for your suggestion, Joshua. > > Yes, the rule RewriteRule ^/balancer-manager$ /balancer-manager [P,L] makes > no sense. I just pick it as an example. > > In fact, my rule is like "RewriteRule ^/(.*) /%{ HTTP_REF

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy report "DNS lookup failure" when combined mod_proxy and mod_rewrite

Thanks for your suggestion, Joshua. Yes, the rule RewriteRule ^/balancer-manager$ /balancer-manager [P,L] makes no sense. I just pick it as an example. In fact, my rule is like "RewriteRule ^/(.*) /%{ HTTP_REFERER}/$1 [P,L]". But Apache also returns 502 error. So I simplify my rule to "RewriteRul

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy report "DNS lookup failure" when combined mod_proxy and mod_rewrite

2008/2/20 Robert Balabalame <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > ProxyPass /balancer-manager ! > RewriteEngine On > RewriteRule ^/balancer-manager$ /balancer-manager [P,L] > Reason: DNS lookup failure for: www.mysite.com > But I can access http://www.mysite.com/balancer-manager successfully if

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy report "DNS lookup failure" when combined mod_proxy and mod_rewrite

Hi, all: I want to use mod_rewrite to modify some url and pass it to backend servers。And the following is my config。 ServerName www.mysite.com AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html text/css application/x-javascript ProxyPass /balancer-manager ! ProxyPass /yui ! ProxyPa

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy report "DNS lookup failure" when combined mod_proxy and mod_rewrite

Hi, all: I want to use mod_rewrite to modify some url and pass it to backend servers。And the following is my config。 ServerName www.mysite.com AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html text/css application/x-javascript ProxyPass /balancer-manager ! ProxyPass /yui ! ProxyPa

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy question

Ekkehard 'Ekki' Gehm schrieb: Joshua Slive schrieb: On Feb 11, 2008 3:12 PM, Ekkehard 'Ekki' Gehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi everybody! Maybe someone can help me with this issue. We do have a strange setup of different webservers here, and I want to have the main one proxying the conten

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy question

Joshua Slive schrieb: On Feb 11, 2008 3:12 PM, Ekkehard 'Ekki' Gehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi everybody! Maybe someone can help me with this issue. We do have a strange setup of different webservers here, and I want to have the main one proxying the content of the otherone exept of a few

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy question

On Feb 11, 2008 3:12 PM, Ekkehard 'Ekki' Gehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi everybody! > > Maybe someone can help me with this issue. We do have a strange setup of > different webservers here, and I want to have the main one proxying the > content of the otherone exept of a few dirs. > So my setu

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy question

Hi everybody! Maybe someone can help me with this issue. We do have a strange setup of different webservers here, and I want to have the main one proxying the content of the otherone exept of a few dirs. So my setup is: ... ProxyPass /pcpool ! ... ProxyPass / http://www.physics.tu-berlin.de/

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy not handling redirects correctly

On Jan 24, 2008 3:24 PM, Axel-Stephane SMORGRAV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You need > > ServerName www.mysite.com > ProxyPassReverse / http://www.host1.com/ > ProxyPassReverse / http://www.host2.com/ > > What ProxyPassReverse does is simply rewriting the Location headers that > match the second

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy not handling redirects correctly

nvoyé : jeudi 24 janvier 2008 15:05 À : users@httpd.apache.org Objet : [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy not handling redirects correctly Hi all, I have an environment in which I reverse proxy some servers depending on the value of a cookie, that is: RewriteCond %{HTTP_COOKIE} ^.*destination_host=

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy not handling redirects correctly

Hi, Dani Pardo wrote : > Hi all, I have an environment in which I reverse proxy some servers > depending on the value of a cookie, that is: > > RewriteCond %{HTTP_COOKIE} ^.*destination_host=host1.*$ > RewriteRule (.+) http://www.host1.com$1 [P] > RewriteCond %{HTTP_COOKI

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy not handling redirects correctly

Hi all, I have an environment in which I reverse proxy some servers depending on the value of a cookie, that is: RewriteCond %{HTTP_COOKIE} ^.*destination_host=host1.*$ RewriteRule (.+) http://www.host1.com$1 [P] RewriteCond %{HTTP_COOKIE} ^.*destination_host=host2.*$

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy: is it possible to remove/unset X-Forwarded-For header

I'm using mod_proxy to proxy requests to an application which does not respond properly when mod_proxy adds the X-Forwarded-For header. I'd like to remove the header from the proxied request, but my attempts to do so using mod_headers have failed. This might indicate that the addition of the X-Fo

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and keepalive question

the PR with the test results -ascs -Message d'origine- De : KOZMAN Bálint [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mercredi 9 janvier 2008 11:12 ? : users@httpd.apache.org Objet : RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and keepalive question That's scary. Thanks for your help anyway.

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and keepalive question

À : users@httpd.apache.org Objet : RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and keepalive question That's scary. Thanks for your help anyway. Cheers, Balint On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Axel-Stephane SMORGRAV wrote: > I'm sorry, but I did not realise that you were attempting to use SSL to t

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and keepalive question

- De : KOZMAN Bálint [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mercredi 9 janvier 2008 00:28 ? : users@httpd.apache.org Objet : RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and keepalive question This tells me that it's not possible to use persistent connections to https backends in proxy workers, which is st

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and keepalive question

et : RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and keepalive question This tells me that it's not possible to use persistent connections to https backends in proxy workers, which is strange, as it seemed to be possible in apache 2.0 mod_proxy. Is this correct or I've

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and keepalive question

int [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mardi 8 janvier 2008 16:45 ? : users@httpd.apache.org Objet : [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and keepalive question Hi there, I'm experiencing a different behaviour of apache 2.2's mod_proxy compared to the one in 2.0. From my point of view the main differenc

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and keepalive question

how_bug.cgi?id=43308 -ascs -Message d'origine- De : KOZMAN Bálint [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mardi 8 janvier 2008 16:45 À : users@httpd.apache.org Objet : [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and keepalive question Hi there, I'm experiencing a different behaviour of apache 2.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and keepalive question

Hi there, I'm experiencing a different behaviour of apache 2.2's mod_proxy compared to the one in 2.0. From my point of view the main difference is that 2.0 mod_proxy does not send the "Connection" request header to the backend, while 2.2 mod_proxy always sends "Connection: Close" regardles

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy problem

On 22 Nov 2007, at 15:19, Til Obes wrote: Hello, i have a problem with mod_proxy. I want to redirect all requests to another apache running on localhost:8080. So the url https://s1.example.com/ will be proxied to http://localhost:8080/. But i have a problem with phpmyadmin running inside this v

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy problem with phpmyadmin

On Nov 22, 2007 5:03 PM, Til Obes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > i have a problem with mod_proxy. I want to redirect all > requests to another apache running on localhost:8080. > So the url https://s1.example.com/ will be proxied to > http://localhost:8080/. But i have a problem with phpmy

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy problem with phpmyadmin

Hello, i have a problem with mod_proxy. I want to redirect all requests to another apache running on localhost:8080. So the url https://s1.example.com/ will be proxied to http://localhost:8080/. But i have a problem with phpmyadmin running inside this vhost. I use cookie based authentification an

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy problem

Hello, i have a problem with mod_proxy. I want to redirect all requests to another apache running on localhost:8080. So the url https://s1.example.com/ will be proxied to http://localhost:8080/. But i have a problem with phpmyadmin running inside this vhost. I use cookie based authentification an

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy for same but versioned apps rooted at the same context on different hosts

I have multiple instances of versioned application rooted at the same context but hosted on different machines. I have to access these applications externally via reverse proxy like Apache in the following way, if possible: http://reverse_proxy_host/instance1/app maps to http://internal.host1.com

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: [***SPAM*** Score/Req: 10.4/5.0] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy

On Nov 1, 2007 11:26 AM, Alberto García Gómez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's the idea: > > I have an Apche server running over port 80 and a Squid proxy server running > in the same machine in 3128. But trough some firewall restrinctions that I > can't change due Systems Security Polices. So I

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: [***SPAM*** Score/Req: 10.4/5.0] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy

w to do it. I'll apreciate any idea and help. my best regards. - Original Message - From: "Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 11:23 AM Subject: [***SPAM*** Score/Req: 10.4/5.0] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy On Oct 31, 200

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy

On Oct 31, 2007 4:07 PM, Alberto García Gómez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Can I proxying a connection using mod_proxy in avirtual host? Yes. If you need more help, please give us more details about what you are trying to accomplish. Joshua. --

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy

How to compare cookie value to request URLCan I proxying a connection using mod_proxy in avirtual host? Este correo ha sido enviado desde el Politécnico de Informática "Carlos Marx" de Matanzas. "La gran batalla se librará en el campo de las ideas"

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and unrequested URL-decoding

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Nick, Nick Kew schrieb: >> Why does mod_proxy behave this way? Is there a way to change the >> behaviour? Do workarounds exist? > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41798 > > Stay tuned. I've been fixing quite a lot of mod_pr

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and unrequested URL-decoding

On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:30:44 +0200 Robert Jaeschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why does mod_proxy behave this way? Is there a way to change the > behaviour? Do workarounds exist? http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41798 Stay tuned. I've been fixing quite a lot of mod_proxy bugs.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and unrequested URL-decoding

Hello, I'll describe a small scenario to describe the problem: I added the following lines AllowEncodedSlashes On ProxyPass / http://127.0.0.1:12345/ ProxyPassReverse / http://127.0.0.1:12345/ to my httpd.conf, restarted Apache and started netcat -l -p 12345 and then wget http://localhos

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy giving access forbidden

07, 2007 6:34 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy giving access forbidden I'm trying out some rewrite rules, and I have one that works without [P] (but does it's work as a 302, found, but

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy giving access forbidden

I'm trying out some rewrite rules, and I have one that works without [P] (but does it's work as a 302, found, but over there...) . But when I add [P], I get a 403 forbidden. in the non-[P] version, I can just sniff the 'location' header to find out what is being requested. Is there a way I

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy for rpc over https

Lokesh K B Reddy wrote: Hi, I added that line .. My OWA is working fine with HTTPS only .. Listen 80 Listen 158.218.128.115:443 Regards, Lokesh Have you tried setting the logging level to 'debug' in Apache? "LogLevel debug" Also what do your IIS logs show you? I last had th

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy for rpc over https

PROTECTED] mod_proxy for rpc over https -Original Message- From: Lokesh K B Reddy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 9:56 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy for rpc over https Hi, Forgot to update

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy for rpc over https

-Original Message- From: Lokesh K B Reddy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 9:56 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy for rpc over https Hi, Forgot to update Apache details.. Server version: Apache

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy for rpc over https

users@httpd.apache.org' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy for rpc over https Hi, Still RPC over HTTPS is not working after adding AllowCONNECT 443. Here is my configuration, with this OWA (Outlook Web Access) is working fine , only problem

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy for rpc over https

"RPC_OUT_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?mailbox.roof.com:6002 HTTP/1.1" 200 128 "-" "MSRPC" mailbox.roof.com --> My Mailbox server. Please guide me , how to go further.. Thanks in advance,.. Regards, Lokesh -Original Message- From: Boyle Owen [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy for rpc over https

To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy for rpc over https Hi, Is there any BUG in mod_proxy for RPC over HTTPS,using Apache reverse proxy outlook web access is working fine but rpc over https is not working .Is there any diffrence configuration is required to

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy for rpc over https

> -Original Message- > From: Lokesh K B Reddy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 11:33 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy for rpc over https > > Hi, > > Is there any BUG in mod_proxy for RPC over HT

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy for rpc over https

Hi, Is there any BUG in mod_proxy for RPC over HTTPS,using Apache reverse proxy outlook web access is working fine but rpc over https is not working .Is there any diffrence configuration is required to setup rpc over https using apache reverse proxy . Please help me out.. Regards, L

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy, content-length and flushpackets

Hi, I'm running apache 2.2.4 with mod_proxy and I'm trying to make a Comet service hosted by a backend Tomcat 6.0.13 server work. I have the following line in my httpd.conf: ProxyPass /mycometservice http://127.0.0.1:8080/mycometservice flushpackets=on However, mod_proxy does not seem t

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_proxy / mod_proxy_balancer question: How to take workers gracefully out of service

Hi all, If someone has information on how to take balanced workers gracefully out of service, please let me know! I've been searching the Apache docs in vain, and Google doesn't provide an answer either. Thanks in advance! THE PROBLEM I am using mod_proxy to balance requests to two work

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_proxy problem in 2.2.4

> If you don't have enough memory for the OS to maintain the important > stuff in the buffer cache, then mem_cache isn't going to help because > it will just shove other important stuff out of memory and onto disk. Yes, it is. But it's quite diffucult to explain why without detailed description o

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_proxy problem in 2.2.4

On 5/31/07, Pavel Mateja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But the disk cache often has better performance than the memory cache > even on a normal disk. There are two reasons for this: > > 1. The disk cache is shared between all processes, while the mem cache > must keep copies of each object for eac

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_proxy problem in 2.2.4

> But the disk cache often has better performance than the memory cache > even on a normal disk. There are two reasons for this: > > 1. The disk cache is shared between all processes, while the mem cache > must keep copies of each object for each processes. > > 2. The disk cache takes full advantag

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_proxy problem in 2.2.4

On 5/31/07, Pavel Mateja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday 31 of May 2007 15:32:43 Joshua Slive wrote: > Yes, it is likely a mod_mem_cache problem. Try using the disk cache > instead. It is better tested, and likely just as performant as the mem > cache in most circumstances. Unfortunatelly

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_proxy problem in 2.2.4

On Thursday 31 of May 2007 15:32:43 Joshua Slive wrote: > Yes, it is likely a mod_mem_cache problem. Try using the disk cache > instead. It is better tested, and likely just as performant as the mem > cache in most circumstances. Unfortunatelly it's not an option for us. We have to use some sort o

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_proxy problem in 2.2.4

On 5/31/07, Pavel Mateja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Had anybody seen such problem? It's related with mod_cache_mem because I was uable to replicate it without mod_cache_mem compiled in. Yes, it is likely a mod_mem_cache problem. Try using the disk cache instead. It is better tested, and likely

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_proxy problem in 2.2.4

Hey! I have problem with mod_proxy in apache 2.2.4. I got wrong data In cca 1 request of 1000 via my proxy apache. There is end of another page requested by someone else at begin of page requested by me. It's like HTTP/1.0 200 OK ..generated HTTP header - we are using UTF-8 almost everywhere.. Co

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy request buffering

Hi all Could anyone say to what degree mod_proxy buffers a request prior to passing it on? For long running requests (users on slower connections doing uploads) we would prefer the proxy to read the request in its entirety before passing it on to the backend. That way we don't have to commit sign

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy request buffering

Hi all Could anyone say to what degree mod_proxy buffers a request prior to passing it on? For long running requests (users on slower connections doing uploads) we would prefer the proxy to read the request in its entirety before passing it on to the backend. That way we don't have to commit sign

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy reverse roblem

Hi All, I have configured mod_proxy in one of my servers.. and the configuration is like below... DocumentRoot ProxyRequests Off Order Deny,Allow Allow from all AuthName "PATH1" AuthType Basic

  1   2   3   >