Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_aspdotnet

2006-09-28 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Derek Cordon wrote: > Bill, > > Thanks for the response. I am pleased to hear that it has not been > retired. Can you give me any indication of when an update will be > officially released that will allow me to control the .NET Framework version > that is used? Not by the ASF. You can certain

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_aspdotnet

2006-09-28 Thread Derek Cordon
. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 3:12 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_aspdotnet It is in-transistion, not retired. You can find some transitional, unreleased binaries at http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/aspdotnet_moving/ which

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_aspdotnet

2006-09-28 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
It is in-transistion, not retired. You can find some transitional, unreleased binaries at http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/aspdotnet_moving/ which (once rebranded) will land at http://sourceforge.net/projects/mod-aspdotnet. Yours, Bill Derek Cordon wrote: > Hello, > > Our company is using Apach

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_aspdotnet

2006-09-28 Thread Derek Cordon
Hello, Our company is using Apache HTTP Server 2.0.52 along with the mod_aspdotnet-2.0.0. Our application requires .NET Framework 1.1, so we are encountering issues when a PC has .NET Framework 2.0 installed. Awhile back I found a pre-release version of the mod-aspdotnet (mod_aspdotnet-2.0.0.200