Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weird NameVirtualHost problem

2007-11-03 Thread tech1
Sorry, but I did check the correct conf file. Apache runs here with both -d and -f flags and a "ps -x" shows both. As I mentioned when I ran the -S flag it showed the NameVirtualHost block, and then showed it removed. Apache was reinstalled after FreeBSD with the current distribution from A

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weird NameVirtualHost problem

2007-11-02 Thread solprovider
You did not test #1. If you run "httpd -S" without the correct -f option, you are testing httpd.conf. (FreeBSD's Apache httpd defaults to "/usr/local/etc/apache/httpd.conf".) httpd.conf will not affect your production server if your init scripts use the -f option. The best scenario matching the s

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weird NameVirtualHost problem

2007-11-02 Thread tech1
Thanks. 1) I'm sure it's the correct conf file, I removed the entire NameVirtualHost section and checked with httpd -S to see that they were gone after a -HUP. Then I put them back and checked it again. 2) I mentioned I'm using FreeBSD. It is always the same hosts that work, I added them

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weird NameVirtualHost problem

2007-11-02 Thread solprovider
1. Which VirtualHosts work should change when you change the order of the entries. Are you certain you are editing the correct configuration file? Rename the configuration file and restart the server to verify. Apache httpd will error without the configuration file. If the server starts properl

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Weird NameVirtualHost problem

2007-11-02 Thread tech1
I'm running apache 1.3 on a FreeBSD box. I've just started using NameVirtualHosts for about 100 web sites. There are other web sites on the server using individual IP addresses. The containers are all identical except for the info pertinent to each domain name and directory, they were ALL