Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Validity of regex in mod_alias context

2006-02-21 Thread Robert Ionescu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RewriteRule ^(?:.+://)?(.*) https://$1 [R,L] This doesn't look correct. The pattern is matched against a local URL in per-server context - w/o sheme+hostname - and a local filepath in per-dir context RewriteRule ^(.*) https://example.com/loo/$1 [R,L] There is a

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Validity of regex in mod_alias context

2006-02-21 Thread Ralph.Grothe
e.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Validity of regex in mod_alias context > > > * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > RedirectMatch 301 ^(?:[[:alpha:]]+://)?(.*) > > https://$1 > > > > > > > >

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Validity of regex in mod_alias context

2006-02-21 Thread André Malo
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > RedirectMatch 301 ^(?:[[:alpha:]]+://)?(.*) > https://$1 > > > > But it doesn't work, and neither the httpd's access_log nor > error_log (or their ssl_ namesakes) > show up any hint why. > > In mod_alias'es reference doc I couldn't

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Validity of regex in mod_alias context

2006-02-21 Thread Ralph.Grothe
Hello Apache httpd users, I have just subscribed to this list to clarify a few things for me that so far I couldn't find in the abundance of Apache and its modules' refeernce and howto material. Probably something like this has been asked a million of times here and thus already found sufficient