[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Mod_auth_radius

2006-05-12 Thread Joost de Heer
Mike VanHorn wrote: > >> Did you load all the needed modules? You need mod_auth_basic.so for >> basic >> authentication. > > Yes. Well, I think so, anyway. I'm looking in to mod_authnz_external now, > as > it comes with a radius authenticator, and adheres to the new > authentication > model that Ap

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Mod_auth_radius

2006-05-12 Thread Mike VanHorn
> Did you load all the needed modules? You need mod_auth_basic.so for basic > authentication. Yes. Well, I think so, anyway. I'm looking in to mod_authnz_external now, as it comes with a radius authenticator, and adheres to the new authentication model that Apache 2.1/2.2.x introduced. From readi

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Mod_auth_radius

2006-05-12 Thread Joost de Heer
Mike VanHorn wrote: > > I'm using mod_auth_radius with Apache 2.2.2 to protect a directory. Here's > the entries from the log file: > > [Thu May 11 15:32:43 2006] [debug] mod_auth_radius-2.0.c(1154): Radius > Auth > for: servername requests /path-to-protected-directory/ : > file=/full-path-to-prote