Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Apache 2.2.3 rotatelogs.exe on Windows

2007-12-02 Thread Kenji Kikuchi
Hi I have tested 2.2.3, 2.2.4 and 2.2.6 with following directive on WindowsXP. - ErrorLog "| c:/apache2/bin/rotatelogs.exe c:/apache2/logs/%Y%m%d_error.log 86400" - Somehow I can't start 2.2.4 httpd.exe from tray icon. -- 2.2.3 : Server starts 2.2.4 : Server starts when execu

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Apache 2.2.3 rotatelogs.exe on Windows

2007-11-30 Thread sniedermeyer
I've been trying to figure out how to rotate the error log in a Windows environment. I'm rotating the access logs in the vhost config file as follows: LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b \"%{Referer}i\" \"%{User-Agent}i\"" combined LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b" common

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-11 Thread ramakrishnaprasad.annasamudram
PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 6/11/2007 7:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: Apache 2.2.3 Hi Bob, It is inside my company's network. The url is not visible to outside world. The test display the sample index.html with http:/ip-address fine, however, w

[EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-11 Thread Kong, Alan
Hi Bob, It is inside my company's network. The url is not visible to outside world. The test display the sample index.html with http:/ip-address fine, however, when I replaced the index.html with some complicated html files(showing pictures, calling javascript with

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-08 Thread Robert T Wyatt
Is it a public page? May we see the URL? Have you checked that the .gif is being called with an appropriate relative or absolute URL? That is, is the link correct? Alternatively, as Joshua said, what is the exact error message? Please keep your replies on the list since most of us are going home

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Apache 2.2.3 - Virtual Host

2006-08-31 Thread Joshua Slive
On 8/31/06, Evaggelos Balaskas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joshua Slive wrote: > The reason this isn't supported in any version of apache httpd is > because it is extremely difficult to accomplish without severe > compromises given the unix permissions model. One alternative is to > run each vho

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Apache 2.2.3 - Virtual Host

2006-08-31 Thread Evaggelos Balaskas
Joshua Slive wrote: > The reason this isn't supported in any version of apache httpd is > because it is extremely difficult to accomplish without severe > compromises given the unix permissions model. One alternative is to > run each vhost as a separate apache httpd instance and then use a > reve