On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 01:08, Zach Uram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> I think my Apache is not serving the GB2312 charset. So I looked here:
Apache does not "serve" character sets. Apache will pass a html page
on to the browser, which will render it. The browser guesses what
charset the u
Hello,
I downloaded a chinese webpage onto my remote server using wget (where
I host my Apache 1.3 webserver - running Debian testing release) and
when I view it the Chinese characters have been replaced with ASCII
gibberish. Yet the original Chinese page displays fine in Firefox on
my local machi
Thanks
I got it working real simple actually. I put my first attempt in the
proxy.conf file but it was conflicting with entries from another virtual
host. Once I separated all the entries out to the virtual host config files
everything worked a treat.
Cheers
Phil
On 10/12/2007, Staf Wagemakers
On Dec 10, 2007 8:57 AM, Phil Wild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I am trying to setup a reverse proxy. I have followed a few of the guides
> and it has worked a charm but now I am trying to dom something a little
> different.
>
> I have an apache2 website with all the right modules loaded for r
Hi apache users,
I am trying to setup a reverse proxy. I have followed a few of the guides
and it has worked a charm but now I am trying to dom something a little
different.
I have an apache2 website with all the right modules loaded for reverse
proxying called running on makebelieve site receive
At 08:08 AM 8/13/2007, Shakeel Ahmad wrote:
>Thanks Sir as you are helping me...
Please don't post in HTML, and please trim unnecessary content from
the post.. there's no reason to quote 5 replies deep.
Thanks. :)
-
nate DNS server is empty
Please help sir, you are the only hope for me until now...
- Original Message -
From: Chakan
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 4:16 PM
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please Help
Hello Shakeel,
I think the following things could
rks. And before you change something in your httpd.conf file you
should create a backup.
Kind regards,
Ch
_
From: Shakeel Ahmad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 August 2007 07:46
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECT
On Aug 12, 2007, at 10:46 PM, Shakeel Ahmad wrote:
But still when i try to open http://localhost or MailScanner
warning: numerical links are often malicious: http://127.0.0.1 it
continuously searches but does'nt show any page or error.
Perhaps you have a firewall that blocks ac
---
With Apache Running I find the following by using (netstat -an)
---
Active Connections
Proto Local Address
On 6/25/07, Uday Kamath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello
1. I have configured Apache (2.0.59) as forward proxy server using
directives as below
ProxyRequests On
AllowCONNECT 80 7002 443
Order deny,allow
Allow from all
AuthType Basic
AuthName "Password Required"
AuthUserFile
Hello
1. I have configured Apache (2.0.59) as forward proxy server using
directives as below
ProxyRequests On
AllowCONNECT 80 7002 443
Order deny,allow
Allow from all
AuthType Basic
AuthName "Password Required"
AuthUserFile "C:/Apache2.0/Apache2/passwords/password"
Requir
Hi All--
I am looking for something simillar to set /.perf utility in iPlanet
Webserver, in Apache webserver to complete realtime performance statistics
of apache webserver, specially in IBM HTTP webserver (base line is
Apache)...
Please let me know if someone did this before and any HOWTO docum
> -Original Message-
> From: Devireddy, Nagendra Reddy (STSD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 1:12 PM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please help on Apache Modules
>
> Hi,
>
> An application that I am w
Hi,
An application that I am working on has dependency on some Apache
modules. I
downloaded and compiled the Apache HTTP server 2.0.59.
The Application has some dependency on the Apache Modules. In httpd.conf
the
following lines are there:
LoadModule proxy_module modules/mod_proxy.so
LoadModule
Hi,
Nick Kew wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 August 2006 14:15, Boyle Owen wrote:
>
>>> On Tuesday 08 August 2006 01:48, Joshua Slive wrote:
As I have pointed out, it seems that hotmail is silently eating the
unsubscription confirmation request. This is another good reason to
not use hotma
On 8/8/06, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 01:48, Joshua Slive wrote:
> As I have pointed out, it seems that hotmail is silently eating the
> unsubscription confirmation request. This is another good reason to
> not use hotmail.
Maybe the safe option would be for
On 8/8/06, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Joshua Slive
>
> As I have pointed out, it seems that hotmail is silently eating the
> unsubscription confirmation request. This is another good reason
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 14:15, Boyle Owen wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 August 2006 01:48, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > > As I have pointed out, it seems that hotmail is silently eating the
> > > unsubscription confirmation request. This is another good reason to
> > > not use hotmail.
> >
> > Maybe the
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick Kew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 3:03 PM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please help
>
> On Tuesday 08 August 2006 01:48, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> > As I have poin
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 01:48, Joshua Slive wrote:
> As I have pointed out, it seems that hotmail is silently eating the
> unsubscription confirmation request. This is another good reason to
> not use hotmail.
Maybe the safe option would be for the unsubscribe process to
default to automatical
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Joshua Slive
>
> As I have pointed out, it seems that hotmail is silently eating the
> unsubscription confirmation request. This is another good reason to
> not use hotmail.
Two thoughts:
- if hotma
On 8/7/06, alexa song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Owen,
I have tried over and over again to get out of the newsgroup,
sending emails to unsubscribe...
But, next day or a week after and continuously... it goes on.
I don't know but you seemed heavily involved with this group.
And seem
Dear Owen,
I have tried over and over again to get out of the newsgroup,
sending emails to unsubscribe...
But, next day or a week after and continuously... it goes on.
I don't know but you seemed heavily involved with this group.
And seems to me it is the last card for me to try sending emai
perhaps you meant robots.txt?Robots Exclusion Standard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Robots.txt)
Jump to: navigation, search
The robots exclusion standard or robots.txt protocol is a convention to prevent cooperating web spiders and other
web robots
Ricardo Kleemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks Max.> A first look shows that the script "bots.txt" currently available targets > vulnerable installation of "Joomla" and "Mambo". There are some > vulnerabilities reported for the included phpBB and an extension called > perForms.But how in the f
Ricardo Kleemann schrieb:
does ANYBODY even know what bots.txt even DOES?
bots.txt should look like this:
accept all
reject altaVista
look at virussin.com/bots.txt to see what it SHOULD do... its for
SEARCH EINGINES. the bot grabs it, looks at it, and it its on the
white list of eingines, it
Morgan Gangwere wrote:
> On 7/15/06, Ricardo Kleemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks Max.
>>
>> > A first look shows that the script "bots.txt" currently available
>> targets
>> > vulnerable installation of "Joomla" and "Mambo". There are some
>> > vulnerabilities reported for the included
does ANYBODY even know what bots.txt even DOES?
bots.txt should look like this:
accept all
reject altaVista
look at virussin.com/bots.txt to see what it SHOULD do... its for
SEARCH EINGINES. the bot grabs it, looks at it, and it its on the
white list of eingines, it caches the site, if its on
On 7/15/06, Ricardo Kleemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Max.
> A first look shows that the script "bots.txt" currently available targets
> vulnerable installation of "Joomla" and "Mambo". There are some
> vulnerabilities reported for the included phpBB and an extension called
> perForms.
Thanks Max.
A first look shows that the script "bots.txt" currently available targets
vulnerable installation of "Joomla" and "Mambo". There are some
vulnerabilities reported for the included phpBB and an extension called
perForms.
But how in the first place, is apache even downloading the b
Ricardo Kleemann schrieb:
Hi,
I'm running an older version of apache 1.3.28 under a Suse install.
Today I noticed that somehow a bots.txt perl program is being run, yet
it is not run from the filesystem. Somehow this script is being
downloaded and run.
Yesterday the server was also a vict
Hi,
I'm running an older version of apache 1.3.28 under
a Suse install.
Today I noticed that somehow a bots.txt perl
program is being run, yet it is not run from the filesystem. Somehow this script
is being downloaded and run.
Yesterday the server was also a victim of an attack
from PS
You might be missing the "AuthBasicProvider ldap" -directive.
//Mika
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/15/06 4:04 am >>>
Hello
I am having a lot of trouble getting my users authenticated using
mod_authnz_ldap. There is not much info anywhere and google couldn't
help. And example .htaccess file would help
Is your LDAP server configured to allow anonymous searches? If not
you'll need to use the BindDN and BindPW (I think that was the word, but
you get the picture) directives.
Kyle
Iftikhar Rathore wrote:
Hello
I am having a lot of trouble getting my users authenticated using
mod_authnz_ldap.
Hello
I am having a lot of trouble getting my users authenticated using
mod_authnz_ldap. There is not much info anywhere and google couldn't
help. And example .htaccess file would help greatly.
I have the .htaccess here (besides this .htaccess no other change has
been done to the default apache in
Hey, I figured it out. I have changed the permission of Mambo
files, by their properties... and Voila! Now Mambo
installation says writeable.
Thanks for your patience.
New problem, Now phpMyAdmin say something about socket
#2002 - the server is not answering (or the local MySQL server socket
Thanks men, but Mambo still saying that is unwriteable
why is that?
if I use as servername www.artenovias.cl do I have to name www.artenovias.cl.conf or can be artenovias.conf?
my artenovias.conf file only have:
AllowOverride All
On 3/6/06, Gaël Lams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,> under
Hi,
> under SUSE 10. My idea is to name my localhost as Linux and a virtualhost
> with the domain "www.artenovias.cl". So the computer (browser) respond when
> typing http://Linux and http://www.artenovias.cl
From what I hope I understand from your post, you don't need to use
virtual host, as you
Hi, I'm trying to host my own web sites, in my machine, with my own
domain, under SUSE 10. My idea is to name my localhost as Linux and a
virtualhost with the domain "www.artenovias.cl". So the computer
(browser) respond when typing http://Linux and http://www.artenovias.cl
On 2/7/06, Randy Paries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> I have just built a new fedora 4 box with Apache/2.0.54
>
> i also have two rh9 boxes with Apache/2.0.52
>
> the problem i have is when i display a page with international
> characters on the old boxes the page displays correctly
>
> but
Hello,
I have just built a new fedora 4 box with Apache/2.0.54
i also have two rh9 boxes with Apache/2.0.52
the problem i have is when i display a page with international
characters on the old boxes the page displays correctly
but when the page displays on the new box i get weird text
ie ) old
yup it was SELinux
Sorry i did not know what SELinux was
I just disabled it and life is fine
Thanks for your help
Randy
On 1/6/06, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/6/06, Randy Paries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Joshua
> >
> > I am using Redhat - Fedora 4
> >
> > it is a pretty
On 1/6/06, Randy Paries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua
>
> I am using Redhat - Fedora 4
>
> it is a pretty stright forward setup, and via the shell all the mounts
> behaive as they should
This sounds like an selinux issue. See
http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc3/
http://fedora.redh
Joshua
I am using Redhat - Fedora 4
it is a pretty stright forward setup, and via the shell all the mounts
behaive as they should
how do i "apache under strace "
Thanks
On 1/6/06, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/6/06, Randy Paries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I hope
On 1/6/06, Randy Paries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> I hope someone can help me, I am at a loss...
>
> for some reason, apache will not accept any doc roots created on
> /data3 ( it is a sata drive), or any of the sata drives
>
> it is bizzare.
>
> if i create a doc root on /randy or
Hello,
I hope someone can help me, I am at a loss...
for some reason, apache will not accept any doc roots created on
/data3 ( it is a sata drive), or any of the sata drives
it is bizzare.
if i create a doc root on /randy or /home/randy , apache starts, but
if i create a doc root in
/data3
47 matches
Mail list logo
