On 6/9/06, Joost de Heer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
> On 6/9/06, Joost de Heer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there a specific reason why the 2.2 (or 2.0.58) documentation isn't
>> distributed in PDF format anymore?
>
> Because it takes a chunk of time to genera
Joshua Slive wrote:
> On 6/9/06, Joost de Heer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there a specific reason why the 2.2 (or 2.0.58) documentation isn't
>> distributed in PDF format anymore?
>
> Because it takes a chunk of time to generate the pdf file and nobody
> has gotten around to it.
On 6/9/06, Joost de Heer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Is there a specific reason why the 2.2 (or 2.0.58) documentation isn't
distributed in PDF format anymore?
Because it takes a chunk of time to generate the pdf file and nobody
has gotten around to it. The difference between the docs fo
> -Original Message-
> From: Joost de Heer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 10:33 AM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PDF Documentation
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there a specific reason why the 2.2 (or 2.0.58) documenta
Hello,
Is there a specific reason why the 2.2 (or 2.0.58) documentation isn't
distributed in PDF format anymore?
Joost
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/use
