Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Different security based on network interface

2005-09-14 Thread AragonX
> "AragonX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > >> I know that mod_access and I think mod_security will allow me to do this >> but they do it based on IP address. I'm afraid someone will spoof the >> IP >> addresses of the internal network to bypass this security measure. > > The easiest way

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Different security based on network interface

2005-09-13 Thread Krist van Besien
On 9/14/05, Scott Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "AragonX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > > I know that mod_access and I think mod_security will allow me to do this > > but they do it based on IP address. I'm afraid someone will spoof the IP > > addresses of the internal network

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Different security based on network interface

2005-09-13 Thread Scott Gifford
"AragonX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > I know that mod_access and I think mod_security will allow me to do this > but they do it based on IP address. I'm afraid someone will spoof the IP > addresses of the internal network to bypass this security measure. The easiest way to do this is wi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Different security based on network interface

2005-09-13 Thread Sean Conner
> AragonX wrote: > > > I'm afraid someone will spoof the IP addresses of the internal network > > to bypass this security measure. I don't see how that's possible. Given the following: M - malicious hacker at address M W - webserver I - internal netw

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Different security based on network interface

2005-09-13 Thread Jean-Christophe Montigny
Hello, Administrator wrote: This may be a stupid answer, but isn't it easily possible to set up the interfaces (or firewall, or both) so they reject source IP addresses in the wrong I/F? Or am I missing the point? Just drop packets coming in the external interface that claim to have an IP of

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Different security based on network interface

2005-09-13 Thread Administrator
This may be a stupid answer, but isn't it easily possible to set up the interfaces (or firewall, or both) so they reject source IP addresses in the wrong I/F? Or am I missing the point? David | On 9/13/05, AragonX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > Hello all, | > | > I am trying to secure my web ser

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Different security based on network interface

2005-09-13 Thread Krist van Besien
On 9/13/05, AragonX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > I am trying to secure my web server. It serves internal users (employees) > and external users (customers). There are some web applications that I > would like to have available to internal users but require external users > to have

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Different security based on network interface

2005-09-13 Thread Davide Bianchi
AragonX wrote: > and external users (customers). There are some web applications that I > would like to have available to internal users but require external users > to have a password to access the directory Can you distinguish internal user from external ones? If so, you can use the 'Satisfy' d

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Different security based on network interface

2005-09-12 Thread AragonX
Hello all, I am trying to secure my web server. It serves internal users (employees) and external users (customers). There are some web applications that I would like to have available to internal users but require external users to have a password to access the directory (the applications have