Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Win2K won't respond

2007-03-15 Thread Joshua Slive
On 3/15/07, Tom Donovan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joshua Slive wrote: > No, Win32DisableAcceptEx makes apache fall back to some less-advanced > networking routines. This can solve all sorts of problems, > particularly with buggy network drivers, software firewalls, virus > checkers and similar.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Win2K won't respond

2007-03-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Tom Donovan wrote: > Joshua Slive wrote: >> No, Win32DisableAcceptEx makes apache fall back to some less-advanced >> networking routines. This can solve all sorts of problems, >> particularly with buggy network drivers, software firewalls, virus >> checkers and similar. > > > True - but I thought

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Win2K won't respond

2007-03-15 Thread Tom Donovan
Joshua Slive wrote: No, Win32DisableAcceptEx makes apache fall back to some less-advanced networking routines. This can solve all sorts of problems, particularly with buggy network drivers, software firewalls, virus checkers and similar. True - but I thought the only accept() vs. AcceptEx() *c

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Win2K won't respond

2007-03-15 Thread Joshua Slive
On 3/15/07, Tom Donovan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adding the "Win32DisableAcceptEx" directive (on the top level of the > apache config file) did the trick. After a restart of the server, > everything started working just like it should. It's great that you are up and running, but a little d

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Win2K won't respond

2007-03-15 Thread Gareth Howlett
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Win2K won't respond Gareth Howlett wrote: >> I downloaded and ran the .MSI installer of 2.2.4 on one of my Win2K >> boxes. I moved IIS over to port 8080 and installed apache on port 80. >> The installation went off without a hitch - the install l

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Win2K won't respond

2007-03-15 Thread Tom Donovan
Gareth Howlett wrote: >> I downloaded and ran the .MSI installer of 2.2.4 on one of my Win2K >> boxes. I moved IIS over to port 8080 and installed apache on port 80. >> The installation went off without a hitch - the install log has no >> ... >> The problem is, the server _NEVER_ responds to a si

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Win2K won't respond

2007-03-15 Thread Gareth Howlett
Hi Matthew & Tom, It works! Matthew, I hadn't thought of that but I jumped over the mime-type header response you were looking for and went straight to ethereal/wireshark... I could see the entire conversation to the webserver. Every character of my telnet session was sent and ACKed but after th

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Win2K won't respond

2007-03-15 Thread Tom Donovan
Gareth Howlett wrote: I downloaded and ran the .MSI installer of 2.2.4 on one of my Win2K boxes. I moved IIS over to port 8080 and installed apache on port 80. The installation went off without a hitch - the install log has no ... The problem is, the server _NEVER_ responds to a single get comma

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Win2K won't respond

2007-03-15 Thread matt farey
Gareth Howlett wrote: > Hi, > > I'm new to the list but a long time user of apache - great piece of > software. I've never needed this list before but I seem to have run > into a rather odd problem I can't solve. > > I downloaded and ran the .MSI installer of 2.2.4 on one of my Win2K > boxes. I

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Win2K won't respond

2007-03-15 Thread Gareth Howlett
Hi, I'm new to the list but a long time user of apache - great piece of software. I've never needed this list before but I seem to have run into a rather odd problem I can't solve. I downloaded and ran the .MSI installer of 2.2.4 on one of my Win2K boxes. I moved IIS over to port 8080 and insta