ooking thru the code but
have not yet been able to find it. :(
Richard
- Original Message
From: Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 7:34:47 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 + ProxyErrorOverride errors
Richard de
Richard de Vries wrote:
> (all on one line, so chopped)
We recently made some fixes to ProxyErrorOverride, but I
don't recollect the details. Googling the dev list would
no doubt find it.
In the absence of a better solution, you could perhaps
default to serving the proxy's error pages, but over
Hello everyone; it's been a while since I wrote to this list since everything
has been smooth sailing so far ... but I did stumble on an issue just now that
requires ya'lls expertise.
I don't want to go into too much detail on "why" we're trying to do what we're
doing, but basically I configured
Eric Covener schrieb:
Configuration, failing URL, and error log would be a better start.
I'm sorry, here come the config and Logs:
URI:
http://www.silvio-siefke.de
CGI:
http://www.silvio-siefke.de/cgi-bin/mailer/mailer.cgi
httpd.conf
http://www.silvio-siefke.de/trading/httpd.html
extra/http
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Silvio Siefke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have the Apache 2.2.8 today on my Root Server (Debian etch) compiled. No
> problems with the Apache by compile.
>
>
> ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --enable-modules=all --enable-ssl
> --with-ssl=/usr/
Hello,
I have the Apache 2.2.8 today on my Root Server (Debian etch) compiled.
No problems with the Apache by compile.
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --enable-modules=all --enable-ssl
--with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl --enable-so --enable-rewrite --enable-suexec
--with-suexec-caller=www-data
Thanks to William/Andre for replying.
Eric, that patch did the trick - seems to have fixed the issue, no crashes
since the patch was installed.
Thanks!
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:39 AM, Nick Knack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wr
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:39 AM, Nick Knack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've been trying to diagnose an issue showing up for the past several
> months on our Windows Server 2003 machines (both x32 and x64) running Apache
> 2.2.8 (with SSL). Just using it for PHP scripts - PHProxy and the
Nick Knack wrote:
Hi,
1. After some period of time (every 2 hours yesterday for example), the Non
Paged Pool usage of Apache surges to (on x64) 18TB or thereabouts -
Maybe you'd like to try :
Setting MaxRequestsPerThread to a non-zero limit has two beneficial effects:
* it limits the a
Nick Knack wrote:
Thanks for any responses/suggestions. We aim at getting sufficient info
to file a bug report.
First off you didn't mention which module you used to connect to httpd,
would look there first. Also, pick up 2.2.9 and see if these patches
that are in that release don't solve yo
Hi,
We've been trying to diagnose an issue showing up for the past several
months on our Windows Server 2003 machines (both x32 and x64) running Apache
2.2.8 (with SSL). Just using it for PHP scripts - PHProxy and the like.
1. After some period of time (every 2 hours yesterday for example), the
Hi Folks. A few days ago, I sent these email to the list, and still
got no reply. I thanks if there is someone that can help me.
I'm running Apache 2.2.8 on a FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (i386) machine.
Also, I'm running mod_cband-0.9.7.5_1, both installed via FreeBSD
ports.
When the server is 2-3 day ru
Hello All,
I am currently in the process of upgrading from Apache/2.0.63 (Unix) to
Apache/2.2.8(Unix)to take advantage of mem caching. But when I complie and
run the Apache 2.2.8 I am facing two issues that I believe are related to a
lib that maybe missing or incorrect(cant seem to find it).
Firs
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 5:39 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 SSL is not working on RHEL5.1
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:26 AM, Vinay Purohit
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have developed a apache connector that makes SSL conn
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:26 AM, Vinay Purohit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have developed a apache connector that makes SSL connection to my back-end
> Application. This connector seems to be working fine on RHEl4.5 but it is
> not working on RHEL5.1.
> Do I need to add some rpm/package specific
I have developed a apache connector that makes SSL connection to my
back-end Application. This connector seems to be working fine on RHEl4.5
but it is not working on RHEL5.1.
Do I need to add some rpm/package specifically required to make SSL
connection on RHEL5.1
Hi Folks,
I'm running Apache 2.2.8 on a FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (i386) machine. Also,
I'm running mod_cband-0.9.7.5_1, both installed via FreeBSD ports.
When the server is 2-3 day running, I got the follow when do "apachectl
configtest":
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# apachectl configtest
apache2_mod_cb
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Arnaud Lesueur
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > My interpretation is that my directives (SetEnvIf and RequestHeader)
> > are being executed before the authentication/authorization pro
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Arnaud Lesueur
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My interpretation is that my directives (SetEnvIf and RequestHeader)
> are being executed before the authentication/authorization process. Is
> it true ? Can we force the order ?
I think only the SetEnvIf is running t
Hi folks,
I'm currently using mod_authnz_ldap to process authentication and
authorization on LDAP back-end on Apache 2.2.8. This part is doing
it's work
This authentication is placed in front of a mod_proxy_http in reverse
proxy mode.
I would like to pass user informations to backend application
Further work on this problem: I removed the existing apache22
installation which pkg_add had created (in /usr/pkg), set up pksrc, and
built another apache 2.2.8 (httpd) from source. This one has mod_ssl in
it, but it complains only slightly about missing ssl stuff.
Results are the same, kind of:
I just realized that I didn't answer all of your questions:
The NetBSD computer on which this apache is installed is part of my home
LAN, so I'm not running a browser on the machine running the server: I'm
running the browser on a laptop in the other room.
Regards,
Frank H.
William A. Rowe,
Well, the messages that the server sends, such as status messages, error
messages, and the headers for the directory listings, all come out OK.
Wouldn't everything be encrypted if it were speaking https?
There's this at the bottom of the httpd.conf file, but as I don't have
mod_ssl compiled in,
Is it possible that the web server is speaking HTTPS and the web browser is
speaking HTTP?
Cheers
--
Lloyd Parkes
Senior Systems Programmer
Open Systems
Ph: +64 4 890 2437
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache
OK: I added those directives: results look unchanged.
Result of the apr-1-config command:
$ apr-1-config --version
1.2.9
I also noted that, using the Safari browser instead of FireFox, the URL
of the image file is not displayed: nothing is displayed.
Also, I have "fancy" directory listing enabl
Frank Huddleston wrote:
Greetings,
I'm running NetBSD 4.0. I used pkg_add to install apache-2.2.8, but had
mod_ssl.c compiled in and wanted that to start. I would rather not deal
with SSL just now: I don't need it, so I downloaded the source,
configured a different httpd and put it in /usr/l
Greetings,
I'm running NetBSD 4.0. I used pkg_add to install apache-2.2.8, but
had mod_ssl.c compiled in and wanted that to start. I would rather not
deal with SSL just now: I don't need it, so I downloaded the source,
configured a different httpd and put it in /usr/local (pkg_add had put
th
Guys, since I rebuilt Apache with prefork, the problem hasn't appeared,
so it seems the issue was definitely PHP + threads.
Thank you all who helped!
Laurent
--
/ Leader de Projet & Communauté| I'm working, but not speaking for
\ G11N http://fr.opensolaris.org | Bull Services http://www.bu
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Mark A Christofferson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I am currently running the Apache 2.2.8 port on the FreeBSD 6.3 platform
> with mod_ssl enabled. I received the following vulnerability scan results
> from my organization:
>
>
>
> Vulnerability: mod_ssl Off-By-
Hello,
I have asked this question previously on both the FreeBSD Mailing List
and the mod_ssl mailing list, but didn't receive a response.
I am currently running the Apache 2.2.8 port on the FreeBSD 6.3 platform
with mod_ssl enabled. I received the following vulnerability scan
results from
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Laurent Blume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, Krist, William. I knew about the PHP reluctancy regarding
> threads, but it had worked for years, so I didn't think about it. It
> definitely seems like a plausible culprit. I can at least easily try the
> pref
William A. Rowe, Jr. a écrit :
> Krist van Besien wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Laurent Blume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'll look for how to change the mutexes I can change. Any other hint
>>> will be welcome.
>> You could indeed use:
>> AcceptMutex pthread
>>
>> However,
Krist van Besien wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Laurent Blume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll look for how to change the mutexes I can change. Any other hint
will be welcome.
You could indeed use:
AcceptMutex pthread
However, your problem might be PHP. Running PHP in a multithreade
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Laurent Blume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll look for how to change the mutexes I can change. Any other hint
> will be welcome.
You could indeed use:
AcceptMutex pthread
However, your problem might be PHP. Running PHP in a multithreaded
apache is not recommen
Eric Covener a écrit :
> http://marc.info/?t=11875374893&r=1&w=2
>
> If apachectl -V says fcntl is the default (APR_USE_FCNTL_SERIALIZE?)
> you can hit this if you have two apache components using the default
> type of lock.
Yes, it's fnctl(), I understand it's the default on Solaris.
> Some
Krist van Besien a écrit :
> Two questions:
> - Are you using any "third party" modules (ie, modules that didn't
> come with the apache source itself)?
Yes, PHP 4.4.8.
> - Is any part of your apache install on an NFS share?
No, all of it is local, including pages, logs, conf, etc.
Laurent
--
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Laurent Blume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Fri Apr 11 18:53:07 2008] [emerg] (45)Deadlock situation
> detected/avoided: apr_proc_mutex_lock failed. Attempting to shutdown
> process gracefully.
http://marc.info/?t=11875374893&r=1&w=2
If apachectl -V says f
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Laurent Blume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any idea?
Two questions:
- Are you using any "third party" modules (ie, modules that didn't
come with the apache source itself)?
- Is any part of your apache install on an NFS share?
Krist
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
Hi all,
Okay, the title isn't very descriptive, but I haven't much to work with :-/
We're having a recurrent problem with Apache 2.2 on two Solaris 9 boxes:
it hangs, and becomes unresponsive. Connecting to the port 80, the
connection is established, but stays stuck, and send no data at all.
I t
Hello,
I'm trying to configure Apache to point to openssl 0.9.8g on a 64bit
install of SLES 10. I've installed openssl 0.9.8g to
/app/openssl/0.9.8g and /usr/local/ssl with the --shared option, and
have added /app/openssl/0.9.8g/lib to /etc/ld.so.conf and run ldconfig.
As far as I can tell, the d
Lloyd -- thanks for all your help. Lari revealed the following:
# lari httpd
libgcc_s.so.1 => (file not found)
libgcc_s.so.1 => (file not found)
[2:0]: __ashldi3(): /usr/local/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
[2:0P]: __ashldi3(): httpd
[2:0]: __ashrdi3(): /usr/local/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
[2:0P]: __ashrdi3(): httpd
Greg W. Smith wrote:
Lloyd -- thanks for the information. I actually tried the
LD_OPTIONS='-L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib' as well with no luck. I
got the same
output as you noted in your message.
If you run a Solaris program with LD_DEBUG set to suitable values, the runtime
linker will
Lloyd -- thanks for the information. I actually tried the
LD_OPTIONS='-L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib' as well with no luck. I
got the same
output as you noted in your message.
Greg
Lloyd Parkes wrote:
Greg W. Smith wrote:
libgcc_s.so.1 => (file not found)
libgcc_
Greg W. Smith wrote:
libgcc_s.so.1 => (file not found)
libgcc_s.so.1 => (file not found)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
libgcc is sometimes found.
Here are my compile options:
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --enable-so --ena
All -- I know there have been some messages in the past, however I have not run
into this problem until I upgraded from Solaris 2.9 to Solaris 2.10.
Everything seems to compile correctly however upon closer inspection
libgcc_s.so.1 is not found at runtime. I am currently using
gcc version 3.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>Joshua Slive wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:13 AM, Graeme Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 21:10 -0900, Brian wrote:
>>> > DocumentRoot "L:/test"
>>>
>>> Wouldn't that be "L:\test", with a backslash?
>>
>> No, all paths i
Joshua Slive wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:13 AM, Graeme Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 21:10 -0900, Brian wrote:
> DocumentRoot "L:/test"
Wouldn't that be "L:\test", with a backslash?
No, all paths in httpd.conf should use forward slashes.
The problem of no
MAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 3:13 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 VirtuaHost and a NAS
Hi
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 21:10 -0900, Brian wrote:
> DocumentRoot "L:/test"
W
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:13 AM, Graeme Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 21:10 -0900, Brian wrote:
> > DocumentRoot "L:/test"
>
> Wouldn't that be "L:\test", with a backslash?
No, all paths in httpd.conf should use forward slashes.
The problem of not being able t
Hi
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 21:10 -0900, Brian wrote:
> DocumentRoot "L:/test"
Wouldn't that be "L:\test", with a backslash?
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/
I have windows XP SP2 and have just upgraded to Apache 2.2.8 and have all of
the settings running for my existing websites on local hard drives.
However, due to a large increase in multimedia content I have added a 2TB
NAS device and have it mapped as a drive letter 'L:' for the local machine
that
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 5:05 AM, Andre Hübner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for next quick post, but here better example for segfault. more then 4
> hours between scriptstart and segfault, but i found also line where start
> and kill was between only a few seconds
>
> [Mon Feb 25 0
Hi,
sorry for next quick post, but here better example for segfault. more then 4
hours between scriptstart and segfault, but i found also line where start
and kill was between only a few seconds
[Mon Feb 25 00:04:49 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1670): proxy: grabbed
scoreboard slot 0 in child
Apache2.2.8/php5.2.5 Suse10.1
Hi List,
i have a problem with segfaults in my ApacheInstallation after running a few
days/hours
I switched LogLevel to debug and thats what i got:
[Mon Feb 25 03:22:36 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1670): proxy: grabbed
scoreboard slot 0 in child 27415 for worker pr
OK, by first site I am presuming they get the first site's certificate,
in this case the server.crt This is what is happening now! I have a
virtual host entry __default with a certificate entry to server.crt
What I can't see is how/where I put this message, without taking the
user from one sit
On Feb 18, 2008 11:25 AM, Norman Khine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For now, the next step is to figure out how to generate the message if
> the client does not support SNI.
That's easy. If the client does not support SNI, it gets the first
site. So the first site is where you put the information
On Feb 17, 2008 2:37 PM, Norman Khine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now my issue is that everything seems to work OK for domain_one.com but
> everytime I try to access domain_two.com I get the certificate for the
> machine, that is server.ctr and not domain_two.ctr.
>
> This is not the case in doma
Hello,
OK, I have this working on FF. But I would like to now add an entry in
the conf file for users who's browsers do not support SNI and was
wondering how to generate this message?
As per how-to "..If a user's browser does not support SNI then the first
SSL site in the configuration file w
Eric Covener wrote:
On Feb 17, 2008 8:37 AM, Norman Khine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have some virtual hosts and would like to run SSL with different
certificates on each. Having followed the following how-to,
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Apache_with_Name_Based_Hosting_and_SSL and
reb
On Feb 17, 2008 8:37 AM, Norman Khine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> I have some virtual hosts and would like to run SSL with different
> certificates on each. Having followed the following how-to,
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Apache_with_Name_Based_Hosting_and_SSL and
> rebuilding apache
I am testing this on FF 2.0.0.12 and Safari 3.0.3, I don't have access
to IE7
ON FF I get the right certificate for domain_one, but on the second site
I only get the test certificate of the server.
Is there a way to test SNI that is working correctly.
Thank you
Norman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What browser are you testing? The server may be working fine, but few
browsers are SNI-capable. From the page you linked:
Supported Browsers
SNI has only recently gained support in browsers. The browsers that
have been confirmed to support SNI by this author are:
* Firefox 2.0.0.12
* Int
Hello,
I have some virtual hosts and would like to run SSL with different
certificates on each. Having followed the following how-to,
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Apache_with_Name_Based_Hosting_and_SSL and
rebuilding apache with SNI support, I am having some issues in that
domain2.com only ret
default install
location rectified the error. I would assume it does however.
Dan
From: Stusynski, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 12:22 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 Windows Compile Issue
Hello all,
Hopefully someone can provide guidance or has seen this problem before
since google didn't dredge up anything useful.
During my Win XP build of Apache 2.2.8 using MSCV++ 6.0 I've run across
an issue I can't immediately resolve.
The build fails towards the end of the build when the
From: Spangler, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 January 2008 00:38
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 compile files on x86_64 SLES 10
Hello All,
I'm attempting to build Apache on a 64 bit install of SLES 10. Its been an
interesting ride so far, and I had t
Hello All,
I'm attempting to build Apache on a 64 bit install of SLES 10. Its been
an interesting ride so far, and I had to solve an expat error already,
but now I'm stuck on what appears to be an openssl / apache issue. I'm
running openssl 0.9.8e which I have compiled and installed into
/produc
67 matches
Mail list logo
