Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2.3 and load balancing

2008-06-01 Thread Eric Bowman
Sander Temme wrote: On Jun 1, 2008, at 1:05 AM, Eric Bowman wrote: I'm in a situation (RHEL 5.1) where the only "supported" version of Apache is 2.2.3. We are wishing to avail of the session affinity load balancing features in mod_proxy_balancer, and I'm wondering what the general consensus

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2.3 and load balancing

2008-06-01 Thread Sander Temme
On Jun 1, 2008, at 1:05 AM, Eric Bowman wrote: I'm in a situation (RHEL 5.1) where the only "supported" version of Apache is 2.2.3. We are wishing to avail of the session affinity load balancing features in mod_proxy_balancer, and I'm wondering what the general consensus is on how suitabl

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2.3 and load balancing

2008-06-01 Thread Travis Sidelinger
We have been running 2.2.6 in a production environment doing session balancing. It has been working great. Eric Bowman wrote: Hi, I'm in a situation (RHEL 5.1) where the only "supported" version of Apache is 2.2.3. We are wishing to avail of the session affinity load balancing features in

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2.3 and load balancing

2008-06-01 Thread Eric Bowman
Hi, I'm in a situation (RHEL 5.1) where the only "supported" version of Apache is 2.2.3. We are wishing to avail of the session affinity load balancing features in mod_proxy_balancer, and I'm wondering what the general consensus is on how suitable that version is regarding that feature. Can

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 - Delayed response

2008-04-01 Thread Krist van Besien
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Clayton Dillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For clarification, it takes about 2 seconds after seeing the connection in > tcpdump before I see the server writing to the access_log. For requests taking 2 seconds that is to be expected. Writing the log entry is the l

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 - Delayed response

2008-04-01 Thread Clayton Dillard
Issac, You are right, I should have talked about that in my original post. The server has plenty of hardware resources. He usually runs with 600MB of free memory and he's got two CPU cores. The VM server is also underutilized. Issac Goldstand wrote: > > > Clayton Dillard wrote: >> All, >>

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 - Delayed response

2008-03-31 Thread Issac Goldstand
Clayton Dillard wrote: All, Thank you for taking the time to review my question. After a fresh boot (or a reboot) our Apache server returns pages very quickly to the client browser. We are running SugarCRM and the response time is usually around .29 seconds. This high performance lasts

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 - Delayed response

2008-03-31 Thread Clayton Dillard
All,     Thank you for taking the time to review my question. After a fresh boot (or a reboot) our Apache server returns pages very quickly to the client browser.  We are running SugarCRM and the response time is usually around .29 seconds.  This high performance lasts for some unpredictable p

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 rotatelogs.exe on WindowsXP

2007-11-30 Thread Kenji Kikuchi
Hi All I have installed apache2.2.3 on Windows XP and am using rotatelogs.exe for ErrorLog directive like httpd.conf --- ErrorLog "| C:/test/logs/rotatelogs.exe C:/test/logs/%Y%m%d_error.log 86400" --- rotatelogs.exe seems working correct, but I can't delete the

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 & mod_authnz_ldap & failover

2007-11-22 Thread Stijn Jonker
Hello, We are currently integrating several apache instances with LDAP for authentication, this works wonderfull for one exception and that is LDAP failover. If the primary LDAP server is not available the failover/switch towards the second entry in the config only happens after minutes. Our te

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2.3 + worker mpm + mod_cgid == problem ?

2007-09-13 Thread Torsten Foertsch
Hi, I have an apache 2.2.3 with worker mpm and mod_cgid running on a suse linux SLES9. Now I see on some servers that one Apache process that ought to die due to MaxRequestsPerChild is not dying. The server-status module reports for each of these processes a few (4-5) remaining connections in

[EMAIL PROTECTED] RE : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 with mod_authn_dbd and pgsql

2007-09-10 Thread Laurent FAILLIE
Hi Dustin, --- Dustin Schuemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Im trying to use mod_authn_dbd with pgsql my table > structure is 3 > columns username,password,group. When I try to login > into the > protected directory I get a 500 error. My apache > conf is below. My > logs are [Sun Sep 09

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 with mod_authn_dbd and pgsql

2007-09-09 Thread Vincent Bray
On 10/09/2007, Dustin Schuemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Im trying to use mod_authn_dbd with pgsql my table structure is 3 > columns username,password,group. When I try to login into the > protected directory I get a 500 error. My apache conf is below. My > logs are [Sun Sep 09 20:04:05 2007] [

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 with mod_authn_dbd and pgsql

2007-09-09 Thread Dustin Schuemann
Im trying to use mod_authn_dbd with pgsql my table structure is 3 columns username,password,group. When I try to login into the protected directory I get a 500 error. My apache conf is below. My logs are [Sun Sep 09 20:04:05 2007] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Error looking up blah in database

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3: "You don't have permission to access the requested directory" for public_html directories w/o index.html

2007-07-09 Thread boxyzzy
have fiailed before? Again, thanks, in advance, for your guidance. Charles -Original Message- From: Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 7:36 pm Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3: "You don't have permission to access th

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3: "You don't have permission to access the requested directory" for public_html directories w/o index.html

2007-07-06 Thread Joshua Slive
On 7/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am upgrading Apache from 1.2.6 to 2.2.3. Everything appears to be working except for users' public_html directories without an index.html file. Instead of displaying the files in the directory, the browser displays the following error:

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3: "You don't have permission to access the requested directory" for public_html directories w/o index.html

2007-07-06 Thread Lindsay Hausner
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 4:26 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3: "You don't have permission to access the requested directory" for public_html directories w/o i

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3: "You don't have permission to access the requested directory" for public_html directories w/o index.html

2007-07-06 Thread Hamilton Vera
Greetings http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_autoindex.html Have fun. Hamilton Vera int Administrator (char Network[],char ComputationalSystems[]); http://antispam.br/ "Google is my shepherd, no want shall I know" On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am upgrading Apache from

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3: "You don't have permission to access the requested directory" for public_html directories w/o index.html

2007-07-06 Thread boxyzzy
I am upgrading Apache from 1.2.6 to 2.2.3. Everything appears to be working except for users' public_html directories without an index.html file. Instead of displaying the files in the directory, the browser displays the following error: You don't have permission to access the requested dire

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-17 Thread Can Le
g on. > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua > Slive > Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 3:24 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 > > On 6/8/07, Kong, Alan wrote: >&g

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-12 Thread Kong, Alan
Hi all, I need your help again on error log formatting. My error_log is logging the occurring time on every single line of error message(one error with many lines of error message), below are the sample lines I cut from the error_log. [Tue Jun 12 16:49:00 2007] [error] [client 10.50.166.5] fro

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-11 Thread Joshua Slive
On 6/11/07, Kong, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joshua, It is working!!! I never pay attention on those commented out items in the conf file. I un-commented them out and rebooted the apache, then it works. Thank you very much. Also thanks for those who are trying to help, appreciated. Gla

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-11 Thread Kong, Alan
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 12:16 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 On 6/11/07, Kong, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Graeme, > > These are the URL that I used: > http://cuflink7

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-11 Thread Joshua Slive
On 6/11/07, Kong, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Graeme, These are the URL that I used: http://cuflink7 http://cuflink7/index.html Cuflink7 is one of the internal server inside the company firewall, the relationship between my workstation and this server is on the same LAN, so I can ping it wi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-11 Thread Tony Stevenson
Josh, Fair point. I just wanted to see it for the sake of clarity with the issue. Alan: [1] Is it all images, or just the .gif you cannot access? [2] Do you have the XBit hack switched on? [3] What browser are you using, is it in all browsers that this error occurs? [4] Have you tried manaually

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-11 Thread Kong, Alan
Alan -Original Message- From: Graeme Fowler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 11:57 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 11:52 -0400, Kong, Alan wrote: > Here is the error message: > > The page y

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-11 Thread Joshua Slive
On 6/11/07, Kong, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joshua, Here is the error message: The page you are looking for is currently unavailable. The Web site might be experiencing technical difficulties, or you may need to adjust your browser settings. Ls -la: -rw-r--r-- 1 cuflinkusers

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-11 Thread Graeme Fowler
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 11:52 -0400, Kong, Alan wrote: > Here is the error message: > > The page you are looking for is currently unavailable. The Web site > might be experiencing technical difficulties, or you may need to adjust > your browser settings. What *exact* URL are you using when you get

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-11 Thread Kong, Alan
Joshua Slive Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 11:47 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 On 6/11/07, Tony Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you show me an "ls -la", and a copy of your relevant config please? I think you are

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-11 Thread Joshua Slive
On 6/11/07, Tony Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can you show me an "ls -la", and a copy of your relevant config please? I think you are pointing him wrong here. The config is probably fine, since apache is giving a 200 (success) status code. But he has never really identified EXACTLY wha

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-11 Thread Tony Stevenson
not working. > > I have apache1.3.33 in my another server which is working fine. > > > Alan > > > -Original Message- > From: Tony Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 11:37 AM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: RE: [EMAIL P

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-11 Thread Kong, Alan
d.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 I apologise for wading into this quite late on. But if you are getting an error in your browser then you should be getting an error in your errorlog. Is the gif in the root of the htdocs directory? It's not in /images is it? Can you sho

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-11 Thread Tony Stevenson
TECTED] > Sent: Mon 6/11/2007 7:50 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Kong, Alan wrote: > > >> Unfortunately, there is no error message. Error

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-11 Thread Kong, Alan
Yes, all files are under the DocumentRoot directory. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 10:38 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Hi, Did you checked whether all the files are

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-11 Thread ramakrishnaprasad.annasamudram
-Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua > Slive > Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 3:24 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 > > On 6/8/07, Kong, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-11 Thread Hiep Nguyen
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 3:24 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 On 6/8/07, Kong, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi group, I installed apache 2.2.3 in HPUX11.11 and I will be able to access the

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-11 Thread Kong, Alan
shua Slive Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 3:24 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 On 6/8/07, Kong, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi group, > > I installed apache 2.2.3 in HPUX11.11 and I will be able to access the > test index.html(I

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-08 Thread Joshua Slive
On 6/8/07, Kong, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi group, I installed apache 2.2.3 in HPUX11.11 and I will be able to access the test index.html(It works!!!). However, when I try to access the test gif in the same directory, it gives me an error saying that it is not available. I am new for

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-08 Thread Kong, Alan
- From: Hiep Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 2:45 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 check/change permission of gif file is one way. On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Kong, Alan wrote: > > Hi group, > > I installed apa

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-08 Thread Hiep Nguyen
check/change permission of gif file is one way. On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Kong, Alan wrote: Hi group, I installed apache 2.2.3 in HPUX11.11 and I will be able to access the test index.html(It works!!!). However, when I try to access the test gif in the same directory, it gives me an error saying

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

2007-06-08 Thread Kong, Alan
Hi group, I installed apache 2.2.3 in HPUX11.11 and I will be able to access the test index.html(It works!!!). However, when I try to access the test gif in the same directory, it gives me an error saying that it is not available. I am new for apache, does anyone know how to fix this problem?

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 + Logging partial requests

2007-05-30 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting Joshua Slive ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > See: > http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/Logs/Response_Size Nice. Thanks. % apache2 -l | grep logio mod_logio.c Will work on that then, thanks alot! Regards, Sander. -- | Those who get too big for their britches will be exposed in the end. | 1024D/08CE

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 + Logging partial requests

2007-05-29 Thread Joshua Slive
On 5/29/07, Sander Smeenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello! I'm a happy Apache 2.2.3 user, everything is working just fine, except for this oddity which i'd like to see explained if possible ;-) I recently hosted a large patch to a popular MMORPG on my blog, and as expected, i got tons of hits

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 + Logging partial requests

2007-05-29 Thread Sander Smeenk
Hello! I'm a happy Apache 2.2.3 user, everything is working just fine, except for this oddity which i'd like to see explained if possible ;-) I recently hosted a large patch to a popular MMORPG on my blog, and as expected, i got tons of hits on it. Curious as i am, i started investigating what /

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 prefork mpm mod_proxy_ajp

2007-03-25 Thread Chris Huisman
Can anyone tell me which error code would show up when an like the one mentioned in this thread occurs? Would it be 502, or 504? Or something different? Thanks, Chris. Chris Huisman wrote: So has nobody else experienced the same problem? Is this a bug? Should I provide more information?

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 prefork mpm mod_proxy_ajp

2007-03-23 Thread Chris Huisman
So has nobody else experienced the same problem? Is this a bug? Should I provide more information? Where can I find the error codes for proxy ajp? Chris. Chris Huisman wrote: Hello, I'm having a problem with mod_proxy_ajp, I am receiving the following error messages: [Fri Mar 16 11:37:3

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 prefork mpm mod_proxy_ajp

2007-03-19 Thread Chris Huisman
Hello, I'm having a problem with mod_proxy_ajp, I am receiving the following error messages: [Fri Mar 16 11:37:37 2007] [error] ajp_check_msg_header() got bad signature 420 [Fri Mar 16 11:37:37 2007] [error] ajp_ilink_receive() received bad header [Fri Mar 16 11:37:37 2007] [error] ajp_read_

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 prefork mpm mod_proxy_ajp

2007-03-18 Thread c .
Hello, I'm having a problem with mod_proxy_ajp, I am receiving the following error messages: [Fri Mar 16 11:37:37 2007] [error] ajp_check_msg_header() got bad signature 420 [Fri Mar 16 11:37:37 2007] [error] ajp_ilink_receive() received bad header [Fri Mar 16 11:37:37 2007] [error] ajp_read_head

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 prefork mpm mod_proxy_ajp

2007-03-16 Thread c .
This didn't seem to go through the first time I sent it. -- Forwarded message -- From: c. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mar 16, 2007 2:19 PM Subject: Apache 2.2.3 prefork mpm mod_proxy_ajp To: users@httpd.apache.org Hello, I'm having a problem with mod_proxy_ajp, I am receiving the

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 prefork mpm mod_proxy_ajp

2007-03-16 Thread c .
Hello, I'm having a problem with mod_proxy_ajp, I am receiving the following error messages: [Fri Mar 16 11:37:37 2007] [error] ajp_check_msg_header() got bad signature 420 [Fri Mar 16 11:37:37 2007] [error] ajp_ilink_receive() received bad header [Fri Mar 16 11:37:37 2007] [error] ajp_read_head

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 with apxs | mod_deflate load error

2007-02-23 Thread Sam Mehta
Hello fellow members, I have an apache 2.2.3 installed (manually) on RH-EL4 which is production environment. I would like to start using mod_deflate.so (LoadModule) but apache provides the following error: Cannot load /full_path/modules/mod_deflate.so into server: /full_path/modules/mod_deflate.so:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache/2.2.3 on windows not shutting down

2007-02-01 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Try adding the trailing slash for TortoiseSVN? I'm not familiar with it myself as I use command-line svn client. Sam Carleton wrote: > On 2/1/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> As nobody uses httpd as an application except in brief testing, it has >> relatively little testi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache/2.2.3 on windows not shutting down

2007-02-01 Thread Sam Carleton
On 2/1/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As nobody uses httpd as an application except in brief testing, it has relatively little testing and review. You can always look at the test framework available via svn from; http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/test/trunk/perl-framew

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache/2.2.3 on windows not shutting down

2007-01-31 Thread Octavian Rasnita
also tried stopping the process from Windows processes list, but it shown that it is in the process of stopping... So I needed to reboot. Octavian - Original Message - From: "Sam Carleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 5:31 AM Subject: [EM

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache/2.2.3 on windows not shutting down

2007-01-31 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Sam Carleton wrote: > > httpd -k shutdown > > This should be preferred over pressing Control-C because this lets > Apache end any current operations and clean up gracefully. > > > But it does not work. Does anyone know why? I know it is better to > run it as a service,

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache/2.2.3 on windows not shutting down

2007-01-31 Thread Sam Carleton
My windows GUI app is starting apache and needs to shut it down before it exits. I have tried following the manual: You can tell a running Apache to stop by opening another console window and entering: httpd -k shutdown This should be preferred over pressing Control-C

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 installation not as root

2006-12-31 Thread Vinay Y S
On 12/29/06, Shweta Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: After building and installing when I try to test: /home/sp/proj/bin/apachectl start I get error: Syntax error on line 117 of /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf: apachectl might be the culprit here. A couple of things you can do: Go thru the /home

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 installation not as root

2006-12-29 Thread Sander Temme
Shweta, On Dec 29, 2006, at 7:35 AM, Shweta Patel wrote: ./configure --prefix=/home/sp/proj/ --exec-prefix=/home/sp/proj/ -- with-port=8080 --enable-so --disable-ssl After building and installing when I try to test: /home/sp/proj/bin/ apachectl start I get error: Syntax error on line 117 o

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 installation not as root

2006-12-29 Thread Aplus Dedicated Support, Jarrod Overson
There might be no reference to any ssl.conf in the httpd.conf, it may be that the whole conf.d directory is included with something like Include /path/to/conf.d/*.conf Serge Dubrouski wrote: Look into your httpd.conf file. 1. You can have Include ssl.conf or conf/extra/httpd_ssl.conf or some

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 installation not as root

2006-12-29 Thread Serge Dubrouski
Look into your httpd.conf file. 1. You can have Include ssl.conf or conf/extra/httpd_ssl.conf or some other name (some Linux distros repackage config file) 2. Nothing prevent an admin from putting SSL config into httpd.conf directly in any case READ YOUR HTTPD.CONF file. apachectl is just a si

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 installation not as root

2006-12-29 Thread Shweta Patel
That because in 2.2.3 it's extra/httpd_ssl.conf 1. In that case why is the server even looking into the file /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf ? 2. When or where in the Server code does it look for ssl.conf ? Basically I'm looking for the initial steps that occur once we call apachectl start Thanks a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 installation not as root

2006-12-29 Thread Serge Dubrouski
That because in 2.2.3 it's extra/httpd_ssl.conf On 12/29/06, Shweta Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I do not have the permissions to do so and hence was looking for alternatives. I greped the source for httpd.2.2.3 but could not find an explicit reference to the path "/etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.con

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 installation not as root

2006-12-29 Thread Shweta Patel
I do not have the permissions to do so and hence was looking for alternatives. I greped the source for httpd.2.2.3 but could not find an explicit reference to the path "/etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf" and was wondering how the server picks up this path since I'm not starting it with ssl support and h

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 installation not as root

2006-12-29 Thread Davide Bianchi
Shweta Patel wrote: Syntax error on line 117 of /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf: SSLCertificateFile: file '/etc/httpd/conf/ssl.crt/server.crt' does not exist or is empty Is there a way for me to solve the problem without switching to as root user? Sure, edit the httpd.conf file and remove the "i

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 installation not as root

2006-12-29 Thread Shweta Patel
Hi, I'm trying to install Apache 2 (httpd.2.2.3) with the following configuration on Linux: ./configure --prefix=/home/sp/proj/ --exec-prefix=/home/sp/proj/ --with-port=8080 --enable-so --disable-ssl After building and installing when I try to test: /home/sp/proj/bin/apachectl start I get erro

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Win32 Memory Issue

2006-12-29 Thread Paul Simon
Hi, Is anybody running Apache 2.2.3 on Win32 and using mod_rewrite proxy feature? When I add the line RewriteRule ^/(.*)$ http://someappserver:8111/$1 [P,L], then hit the server using ab, the server proxies correctly until the memory usage builds up causing the server to crash. Killing the apac

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 as proxy

2006-12-21 Thread Joshua Slive
On 12/21/06, Sriharsha M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have set up Apache HTTP Server 2.2.3 with mod_proxy as a forward proxy on RHEL 4.0 and I am planning to build a filter. In Apache 2.2.3, when I use 'mod_case_filter_in.c' from the experimental modules, I always get r->unparsed_uri, r->uri

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 as proxy

2006-12-20 Thread Sriharsha M
Hi, I have set up Apache HTTP Server 2.2.3 with mod_proxy as a forward proxy on RHEL 4.0 and I am planning to build a filter. In Apache 2.2.3, when I use 'mod_case_filter_in.c' from the experimental modules, I always get r->unparsed_uri, r->uri and r->filename as NULL. I get r->hostname an

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 + Active Directory

2006-12-20 Thread Dan Nawrocki
> If the initial bind is working then it's probably your LDAP search > criteria which depends on how your AD is layed out. > > This is what I use (I use the AD global catalog (GC)): > > > AuthLDAPURL > "ldap://ad.nos.com:3268/OU=Accounts,DC=nos,DC=com?sAMAccountName?sub?(ob jectClass=*)" > > Yo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 + Active Directory

2006-12-19 Thread John P. Dodge
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Dan Nawrocki wrote: > > SSLOptions +StdEnvVars > Options FollowSymLinks > AllowOverride None > > AuthType Basic > AuthBasicProvider ldap > AuthName "auth me!" > AuthLDAPBindDN "bind_username" > AuthLDAPBindPassword bind_password > AuthLDAPURL ldap://host:389

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 + Active Directory

2006-12-19 Thread Dan Nawrocki
I am attempting to use authentication over LDAP (actually Active Directory), but it's not working and I'm going crazy! Here's my configuration file: SSLOptions +StdEnvVars Options FollowSymLinks AllowOverride None AuthType Basic AuthBasicProvider ldap AuthName "auth me!" AuthLDAPB

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3: DirectorySlash not allowed here

2006-12-17 Thread Ding Deng
Tony van der Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Yes, but... >> >> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/howto/htaccess.html#what >> > > Thank you for this reference to what an htaccess file is, but, to be honest, > I am at a loss to understand it. Excuse me for the oversimplified answer, as I wrot

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3: DirectorySlash not allowed here

2006-12-17 Thread Tony van der Hoff
On 16 Dec at 19:18 Ding Deng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Tony van der Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to include a DirectorySlash Off in a .htaccess file: > > > > Order allow,deny Allow from all > > > > Options All -ExecCGI #DirectoryIn

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3: DirectorySlash not allowed here

2006-12-16 Thread Ding Deng
Tony van der Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I'm trying to include a DirectorySlash Off in a .htaccess file: > > Order allow,deny > Allow from all > > Options All -ExecCGI > #DirectoryIndex > DirectorySlash off > > This results in a 500; the entry in the error_log being: > /home/www/htm

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3: DirectorySlash not allowed here

2006-12-16 Thread Tony van der Hoff
Hi, I'm trying to include a DirectorySlash Off in a .htaccess file: Order allow,deny Allow from all Options All -ExecCGI #DirectoryIndex DirectorySlash off This results in a 500; the entry in the error_log being: /home/www/html/coxroster_src/.htaccess: DirectorySlash not allowed here According

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 monitor

2006-12-12 Thread Yvo van Doorn
I use Zabbix (http://www.zabbix.com) on all my production machines. Hardly any over head and it does a fantastic job (my opinion) of monitoring. It doesn't restore when done (but could) because of the very reasons others have said. If Apache goes down, something is probably not right on the machi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 monitor

2006-12-07 Thread fRANz
On 12/6/06, Lucuk, Pete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I would like to setup something that would… - test to see is Apache is up or down - if Apache is up, do nothing - if Apache is down, bring it back up ASAP Hi. mon has an http module for check webserver availability:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 monitor

2006-12-07 Thread Norman Peelman
Apache 2.2.3 monitor- Original Message - From: Lucuk, Pete To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 8:59 AM Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 monitor Hello, I have Apache 2.2.3 with mod_ssl and mod_jk installed and they work like a champ! I am now

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 monitor

2006-12-06 Thread Nikolai Lusan
Greetings, On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 08:59 -0500, Lucuk, Pete wrote: > I am now wrapping up my Apache setup with a maintenance in mind. > I would like to setup something that would… > - test to see is Apache is up or down > - if Apache is up, do nothing > - if Apache is down,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 monitor

2006-12-06 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Lucuk, Pete wrote: > > I would like to setup something that would… > > - if Apache is down, bring it back up ASAP Uhm - guy I'm not sure you understand how httpd works. Apache has a parent which doesn't ever serve requests. It starts and manages workers. If the workers crash or exit,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 monitor

2006-12-06 Thread Nick Kew
> On 12/6/06, Lucuk, Pete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would like to setup something that would… > > > > - test to see is Apache is up or down > > > > - if Apache is up, do nothing > > > > - if Apache is down, bring it back up ASAP There's a monitor hook that runs eve

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 monitor

2006-12-06 Thread Serge Dubrouski
If application is really critical take a look at http://www.linux-ha.org/ Otherwise a simple cronjon would do. On 12/6/06, Lucuk, Pete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I have Apache 2.2.3 with mod_ssl and mod_jk installed and they work like a champ! I am now wrapping up my Apache setup w

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 monitor

2006-12-06 Thread Scott Wilcox
Hey Pete, Personally, I'd just write and cron a scriptto check to see if the process if running, if not, start it. Scott. Lucuk, Pete wrote: Hello, I have Apache 2.2.3 with mod_ssl and mod_jk installed and they work like a champ! I am now wrapping up my Apache setup with a maintenance i

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 monitor

2006-12-06 Thread Lucuk, Pete
Hello, I have Apache 2.2.3 with mod_ssl and mod_jk installed and they work like a champ! I am now wrapping up my Apache setup with a maintenance in mind. I would like to setup something that would... - test to see is Apache is up or down - if Apache is up, do nothing

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2.3 and headers management

2006-11-30 Thread Davide Corio
Hi *, I'm trying to setup Apache2 to pass auth headers to Zope The problem is that I can use mod_ntlm to authenticate users against Active Directory but I can't pass the REMOTE_USER variabile to Zope (event with basic auth). Apache passes (null). I recompiled Apache with the SECURITY_HOLE_PASS_AUTH

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and SUDO

2006-11-29 Thread Dave Templeton
Yvo, I have not been in the habit of using apachectl but starting httpd directly. I will try this how ever and thanks for the idea. Dave. On 11/28/06, Yvo van Doorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You can just edit the apachectl script and add this: LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/path/to/libraries" export

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and SUDO

2006-11-28 Thread Yvo van Doorn
You can just edit the apachectl script and add this: LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/path/to/libraries" export LD_LIBRARY_PATH or You can edit /etc/profile and add those two lines. Not sure how compiling apache statically would help (maybe someone else can enlighten me). On 11/28/06, Dave Templeton <[EMAIL P

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and SUDO

2006-11-28 Thread Dave Templeton
Is there any way to complie httpd statically. The rteason is I need to use SUDO and that wipes the LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable so apache cannot find its shared object libraries.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2.3 and weblogic

2006-11-28 Thread arun kumar
i heard weblogic does now support apache 2.2.3..is there is any to integrate apache 2.2.3 with weblogic other than weblogic plugin and if possible then how to do load balancing Regards, Arun __ Yahoo! India Answers: Share w

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Memory Usage

2006-11-21 Thread Chris
On 20/11/06, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/20/06, Strader, William A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well it does seem like mod_perl is a a RAM users... I commented it out and > instead of 120mb RAM it is using 60mb RAM... Any suggestions on what I can > do to make mod_perl not use

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Memory Usage

2006-11-21 Thread Strader, William A.
@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Memory Usage On 11/20/06, Strader, William A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not sure if this is the right place to be asking but I thought I would > try. > > OK I am running Fedora Core 6 with Apache 2.2.3 (installed via yum).

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Memory Usage

2006-11-21 Thread Sander Temme
Hey Chris, On Nov 20, 2006, at 7:57 PM, Chris wrote: Hi I use apache 1.3 as well as 2.2.3 so this is off topic since this is for 2.2.3 but I have just noticed my processes use in excess of 100meg per child, I run eaccelerator which I know accounts for some of this 32meg so this would leave arou

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 + SSL + NT 4.0 Client

2006-11-14 Thread Serge Dubrouski
Hello - We have an Apache 2.2.3 Server + mod_ssl installed. Also we have some locations configured like this: ClientVerify none ClientVerify Optional Now here is the problem that we have. For IE 6.0 and 7.0 clients working under Windows XP everything works fine but for IE 6.0 under NT 4.

Re: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 lots of empty error logs

2006-11-14 Thread Filip Kolendo
Hello, I have exactly the same problem... Apache 2.0.58 Windows 2003 Svr PHP 5.0.5 (or 5.1.4) as CGI I have noticed that empty error lines in errorlog are connected with the HTTP result status = 302 Found. I mean every time the script returns the HTTP header with status code 302, new line to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and PHP 5.1.6

2006-11-02 Thread Ed Lazor
me. LoadModule php5_module "C:\php\php5apache2_2.dll"PHPIniDir "C:/php" AddType application/x-httpd-php .php  AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phpsBill Angus, MAhttp://www.psychtest.com- Original Message -From: Ed LazorTo: users@httpd.apache.orgSent: Thursday, N

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and PHP 5.1.6

2006-11-02 Thread Bill Angus
nal Message - From: Ed Lazor To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 10:36 AM Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and PHP 5.1.6 I've been Googling and searching the mailing list archive with no  luck, so I thought I'd try asking fo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and PHP 5.1.6

2006-11-02 Thread Ed Lazor
I've been Googling and searching the mailing list archive with no luck, so I thought I'd try asking for help... I'm getting an error of: Invalid command 'AddType' when trying to start Apache. The PHP 5 installation instructions say to modify httpd.conf and add LoadModule php5_module

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 , Cronolog 1.6.X on Win2K

2006-10-29 Thread toadie D
It seems that cronolog does not play well with apache 2.2.3 . when you shut down apache, none of the cronolog sessions are terminated. they just left hanging. This didn't happen with Apache 2.0.5X. I looked at the cronolog src code and none of it is Apache specific so I would assume that you shou

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Startup on Suse 10.0??

2006-10-25 Thread Arthur DiSegna
> > Does ne1 have a recommendation to get Apache 2.2.3 to automatically > > restart on Suse 10.0? > > Why don't you use the /etc/init.d/apache2 file made by SuSe, modify > the various paths and then "insserv -d your_script"? > > >>I apologize for not mentioning it but I compiled Apache. Actuall

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Startup on Suse 10.0??

2006-10-24 Thread Barul Wilian
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Startup on Suse 10.0?? Hi Arthur, > > Does ne1 have a recommendation to get Apache 2.2.3 to automatically > > restart on Suse 10.0? > > Why don't you use the /etc/init.d/apache2 file made by SuSe, modify > the various

  1   2   >