Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.2 and WebSphere PlugIn

2006-07-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Qingshan Xie wrote: If the Apache-2.2.2 compiled with mod_so, Apache should be able to load mod_was_ap20_http.so without any issue. Not likely. First, there is a module signature of "AP20" in any module which was compiled under apache 2.0, which absolutely will not load under apache 2.2 (the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.2 and WebSphere PlugIn

2006-07-22 Thread Qingshan Xie
> > Alexander Lazic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 20/07/2006 10.10 > Please respond to > users@httpd.apache.org > > > To > users@httpd.apache.org > cc > > Subject > Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.2 and WebSphere PlugIn > > > > > > &

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.2 and WebSphere PlugIn

2006-07-20 Thread Sander Temme
Manuela, On Jul 20, 2006, at 12:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LoadModule was_ap20_module /opt/CHROOT/HTTPD/WebSpherePlugin/bin/ mod_was_ap20_http.so WebSpherePluginConfig /opt/CHROOT/HTTPD/WebSpherePlugin/config/ atmweb-ts-proxy/plugin-cfg.xml But now when I run the command 'apachectl -t'

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.2 and WebSphere PlugIn

2006-07-20 Thread Oliver.Schaudt
.x. bye Oliver -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Do 20.07.2006 09:39 An: users@httpd.apache.org Betreff: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.2 and WebSphere PlugIn I've compiled Apache 2.2.2 and now I would like to use apache with websphere plugin

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.2 and WebSphere PlugIn

2006-07-20 Thread Alexander Lazic
On Don 20.07.2006 10:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The permission bits for allthe plugin directory are 755. I'm on Z/linux. But it is the same as in another suse linux version. Is this the 64 or the 31 bit version?! My question is if with a compiled apache (and then I don't load modules dinam

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.2 and WebSphere PlugIn

2006-07-20 Thread Manuela . Vorazzo
sers@httpd.apache.org cc Subject Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.2 and WebSphere PlugIn On Don 20.07.2006 10:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I'm using a Linux Suse 9. >I would like to use the plugin because it was written for balancing >throught WebSphere Applica

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.2 and WebSphere PlugIn

2006-07-20 Thread Alexander Lazic
On Don 20.07.2006 10:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using a Linux Suse 9. I would like to use the plugin because it was written for balancing throught WebSphere Application Server and I think that if I have a WebSphere Application server on backend it would be better using its plugin to rev

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.2 and WebSphere PlugIn

2006-07-20 Thread Manuela . Vorazzo
proxy pass reverse. manuciaoThanks Alexander Lazic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 20/07/2006 09.52 Please respond to users@httpd.apache.org To users@httpd.apache.org cc Subject Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.2 and WebSphere PlugIn Hi, On Don 20.07.2006 09:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.2 and WebSphere PlugIn

2006-07-20 Thread Alexander Lazic
Hi, On Don 20.07.2006 09:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've compiled Apache 2.2.2 and now I would like to use apache with websphere plugin to pass requests to a remore WebSphere Application Server. Do you really must use the plugin or can you use the proxy-balance module? What i mean is if th

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.2 and WebSphere PlugIn

2006-07-20 Thread Manuela . Vorazzo
I've compiled Apache 2.2.2 and now I would like to use apache with websphere plugin to pass requests to a remore WebSphere Application Server. I installed and configured the plugin as written in the IBM guide and everything is Ok. I can find these two new lines in the httpd.conf: LoadModule was_a