Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.0 and Basic AuthType

2006-01-06 Thread Mark McCulligh
Joshua Slive wrote: On 1/6/06, Mark McCulligh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I added the "Allow from all" to the directory and it works now. AuthType Basic AuthName "Login" AuthUserFile /usr/local/httpd/pwd/users.pwd Require valid-user Allow from all Just wondering why in other versions of A

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.0 and Basic AuthType

2006-01-06 Thread Joshua Slive
On 1/6/06, Mark McCulligh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I added the "Allow from all" to the directory and it works now. > > > AuthType Basic > AuthName "Login" > AuthUserFile /usr/local/httpd/pwd/users.pwd > Require valid-user > Allow from all > > > Just wondering why in other versions of Apa

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.0 and Basic AuthType

2006-01-06 Thread Mark McCulligh
Joshua Slive wrote: On 1/6/06, Mark McCulligh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Here is everything: Thanks. That was much clearer. In the httpd.conf file I uncommented the httpd-vhosts.conf, httpd-ssl.conf and httpd-default.conf options. No other changes. Why did you uncomment

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.0 and Basic AuthType

2006-01-06 Thread Joshua Slive
On 1/6/06, Mark McCulligh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is everything: Thanks. That was much clearer. > In the httpd.conf file I uncommented the httpd-vhosts.conf, > httpd-ssl.conf and httpd-default.conf options. No other changes. Why did you uncomment those extra config files? Especially

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.0 and Basic AuthType

2006-01-06 Thread Mark McCulligh
Joshua Slive wrote: On 1/6/06, Mark McCulligh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joshua Slive wrote: On 1/6/06, Mark McCulligh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Group, I cannot get Basic AuthType to work with Apache 2.2.0. Has something changed between versions, like I have to uncomme

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.0 and Basic AuthType

2006-01-06 Thread Joshua Slive
On 1/6/06, Mark McCulligh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joshua Slive wrote: > > >On 1/6/06, Mark McCulligh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Hi Group, > >> > >>I cannot get Basic AuthType to work with Apache 2.2.0. Has something > >>changed between versions, like I have to uncomment something.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.0 and Basic AuthType

2006-01-06 Thread Joshua Slive
On 1/6/06, Mark McCulligh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Group, > > I cannot get Basic AuthType to work with Apache 2.2.0. Has something > changed between versions, like I have to uncomment something. > > I am not going any special just a simple Basic Auth > > AuthType Basic > AuthName "Logi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.0 and Basic AuthType

2006-01-06 Thread Mark McCulligh
Joshua Slive wrote: On 1/6/06, Mark McCulligh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Group, I cannot get Basic AuthType to work with Apache 2.2.0. Has something changed between versions, like I have to uncomment something. I am not going any special just a simple Basic Auth AuthType Basic AuthN

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.0 and Basic AuthType

2006-01-06 Thread Mark McCulligh
y block. -Dave - Original Message - From: "Mark McCulligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Apache User group" Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 9:11 AM Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.0 and Basic AuthType Hi Group, I cannot get Basic AuthType to work with Apache 2.2.0.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.0 and Basic AuthType

2006-01-06 Thread David Salisbury
riginal Message - From: "Mark McCulligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Apache User group" Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 9:11 AM Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.0 and Basic AuthType Hi Group, I cannot get Basic AuthType to work with Apache 2.2.0. Has something

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.0 and Basic AuthType

2006-01-06 Thread Mark McCulligh
Hi Group, I cannot get Basic AuthType to work with Apache 2.2.0. Has something changed between versions, like I have to uncomment something. I am not going any special just a simple Basic Auth AuthType Basic AuthName "Login" AuthUserFile /usr/local/httpd/pwd/users.pwd Require valid-user