Hi;
I have a collection of web pages that use SSI to parse pieces of
$DOCUMENT_NAME and present those bits in the HTML output. Here's the code:
This takes a file name like "z1234_aba_abt.html" and spits back "Z1234
Option ABA Hyperlinks".
This works fine in both Apache 1.3.33 and 2.2.3;
Hi all,
I have been trying to get Mailman (2.1.9) working under Apache2.2+Suexec for
the past few days and am about to give up.
I have gooogled my ___-___ trying to formulate a solution to no avail. I
also have the Mailman install procedure pretty much memorized.
What I am seeing is that th
Hello everyone,
This is my first post to the list, so hopefully I am providing
everything needed to get started. I am running Apache 2.2.3-4+etch5
(Debian Etch, mpm-prefork version), and I am migrating a site over from
an Apache 1.3.34 instance. The site depends on mod_rewrite along with
cont
Hey everyone. We have been running Apache 2.2 as a reverse proxy cache
server for some time, and in general it performs great. We have one
nagging problem however.
Currently we have a cluster of 70+ back-end web servers that are
BalancerMember's. If we apachectl stop on a backend web, we are fine
Hi,
I set up the Apache 2.2+SSL+Tomcat 5.5 + mod_Jk it works fine with HTTP but
when I use https I get Forbidden errors.
How should I configure the Apache2.2 to accept both HTTP and HTTPS requests?
The application uses https and http at the same time and there are not
any restricted directorie
riginal Message -
From: "Davide Bianchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 2:18 AM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2
Michael Rogers wrote:
I am new to servers period!
Then start reading some documentation. There is a h
Michael Rogers wrote:
I am new to servers period!
Then start reading some documentation. There is a huge amount of
documents available on Apache's web site, start from there.
One thing I found is if you make a mistake in the httpd.conf you may as
well trash it copy a new one in it's place b
Hi!
I am new to servers period! I downloaded Apache 2xx because it was free and I
don't have any money to pay for a better one.
So far I have not been able to get it to work. If I can't get any help here to
make this work I will simply have to trash it and forget about running my own
server
I found it finally. I installed VisualSVNServer on my PC and it worked
despite being based on Apache 2.2.8. So I combed through the httpd.conf
files to determine what was different. The difference that proved to be
the answer was that Win32DisableAcceptEx had to be specified for this
compute
Is there something with Windows XP Media Center that will cause Apache
2.2 to hang? I have tried the base 2.2.8 windows installer taking all
the defaults, and it will not serve a page, it just hangs. I tried
installing Zend Core with it's preconfigured Apache 2.2.4 server, it
hangs. I tried
Hello,
Below is a little test script, that show a strange behav. ( or may be a bug ).
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
if ( fork ) {
wait;
}
# this will not work on Apache 2.2 on Windows
# gives following error into "child"
Hi All,
Does anyone know about any available IPv6 enabled binary of Apache 2.2.x on
Windows? If not, how to compile Apache 2.2.x in Windows with IPv6 enabled?
Please help. Thanks in advance
Regards--
Prasanna Ram
But then why does it work transparently sometimes? And why does it work
after I reenter my credentials?
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Daniel T. Gynn wrote:
I have two Apache 1.3 servers running on Windows that use NTLM to
authenticate users.
NTLM isn't a legitimate HTTP authentication protoco
Daniel T. Gynn wrote:
I have two Apache 1.3 servers running on Windows that use NTLM to
authenticate users.
NTLM isn't a legitimate HTTP authentication protocol, it's a point to
point connection oriented protocol, while HTTP is a stateless protocol.
So in short, it cannot be proxied.
I have two Apache 1.3 servers running on Windows that use NTLM to
authenticate users. I have added a third Windows server to load balance
between the two. I have installed Apache 2.2.8 on this server and set
it up to Reverse Proxy. This partially works, it will go to the correct
server for a
port 80 and 443.
regs,
Christian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: thomas Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 31. März 2008 12:46
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2 as a static server (without PHP) to
serve images
> Sure, make a c
> Sure, make a copy of the httpd.conf file, remove everything that refers
> PHP (the LoadModule basically), then run a secondary Apache using that
> config file. You'll have to use a different port of course and redirect
> images and the like to the secondary apache.
>
> But... why?
Thank you
thomas Armstrong wrote:
I was told that Apache 2.2 allows to create a secondary process which
doesn't use PHP to serve images or static files without installing a
secondary Apcache webserver or lighttpd.
Sure, make a copy of the httpd.conf file, remove everything that refers
PHP (the LoadModul
Hi.
I've got Apache 2.2 with PHP running on my Linux box to serve dynamic pages.
I was told that Apache 2.2 allows to create a secondary process which
doesn't use PHP to serve images or static files without installing a
secondary Apcache webserver or lighttpd.
Is it possible? How can I configure
I'm upgrading from 2.0.59 to 2.2.6 on a gentoo box and the vhost config is
giving me grief:
2.2.6 will deliver normal content from the document root
/var/ww/localhost/htdocs via http://myserver when only
vhosts.d/00_default_vhost.conf and
vhosts.d/default_vhost.include
are present,
however as so
D]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 7:58 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2 Loadbalancing/session stickiness for
BEA WL 8.1
Hi,
I had the same problem in my environment. But I was using tomcat instead of
web logic.
What is your JSESSIONID value?
It may be like:
Cookies JSESSIONID value?
-Original Message-
From: Tamer Embaby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 12:18 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2 Loadbalancing/session stickiness for BEA
WL 8.1
Hello all,
I have the below configuration on my
Hello all,
I have the below configuration on my Apache 2.2.8 test server,
my 2 backends are BEA WebLogic 8.1 servers, basically I'm testing
if I can achieve the same load balancing feature that third party
BEA WL 8.1 weblogic_module is doing.
I open a browser window and wnet to: http://myserver/
Can you tell me where I can download it please? Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Apache-2.2-for-Solaris-5.10-on-Sparc-tp15718467p15718467.html
Sent from the Apache HTTP Server - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Why isn't there any zipped binary of the windows version of apache 2.2?
Now I need to uninstall the old installed apache version and after that
install the new version
On Dec 22, 2007 4:58 AM, Michael Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know of a generic auth caching module that can stack on top
> of any of the other various auth modules?
>
> i.e. I want to be able to do something like this.
>
> AuthCache On
> AuthCacheTimeout 10sec
> AuthBasicProvider
Does anyone know of a generic auth caching module that can stack on top
of any of the other various auth modules?
i.e. I want to be able to do something like this.
AuthCache On
AuthCacheTimeout 10sec
AuthBasicProvider cache:myauthmodule
-
I have a problem.
Apache 2.2 DAV/2 changed the way it handles file properties, and now mod_dav
does not work with NFS mounted partition anymore.
When files are uploaded via WebDAV, and the properties are modified, a ".DAV"
directory with associated property file(s) are created.
Apache 2.0.* used:
Thanks, Joshua for your help. Unfortunately I haven't had a chance to
get back to the problem. I appreciate your advice and will check it
out further as soon as I can. There is no firewall but a messed up
stack is not out of the question.
Anna
On 10/28/07, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
On 10/27/07, J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am having some problems getting the expected performance from Apache
> 2.2 running on Windows XP Pro SP2, compared with FileZilla. My test
> file is random data. I am deleting it from the directory it is saved
> to on download prior to
Hello All,
I am having some problems getting the expected performance from Apache
2.2 running on Windows XP Pro SP2, compared with FileZilla. My test
file is random data. I am deleting it from the directory it is saved
to on download prior to re-testing. I don't think there is any
cacheing goin
There appears to be a significant difference between Apache 2.2 MPM
Worker and MPM Perfork virtual memory usage. As well as between Apache
2.2 MPM Worker and Apache 1.3 virtual memory usage. This can become an
issue in a VPS (virtual private server) environment where resources are
more constr
e 7za.exe file into your system32 folder.
Then it is just a matter of calling the batch file from the windows
scheduler. On WinNT this is done on the commend line via AT and on WinXP
this is done via Scheduled Tasks found in the Control Panel.
Some other things that can be done after the files hav
er.
Then it is just a matter of calling the batch file from the windows scheduler.
On WinNT this is done on the commend line via AT and on WinXP this is done via
Scheduled Tasks found in the Control Panel.
Some other things that can be done after the files have been moved, but before
they a
d in taking a
peek
if you feel like sharing.
-Original Message-
From: Mark A. Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 2:01 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows
Philip, do you use a scheduled CMD
ect: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows
From: Phillip Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 11:50:08 AM
I wholeheartedly disagree with this statement:
Apache holds only a tiny share of
Windows servers.
Apache hol
-
From: Dragon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 1:02 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows
Mark A. Craig wrote:
>So this leads me to ask again, what are all of you successful 2.2.4
>admins using to
Mark A. Craig wrote:
So this leads me to ask again, what are all of you successful 2.2.4
admins using to rotate your logs? If the piping mechanism is
broken, at least in the Windows binary, then what other technique(s)
are people using? Task Scheduler with a batch or CMD file?
So far I've b
ating the logs, but I'd understandably like to
automate it.
Mark
Original Message
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 08:3
Norman Peelman wrote:
>
> I am unsure of what would be causing your Unicode issues, sorry. That
> being said.. i've heard/read that there are issues with rotatelogs on
> W32 platforms. I have successfully used rotatelogs on my old XP box
> after alot of hassle. What I found for me was that I had
the
error... if I comment them out, I don't.
Now you know why I'm asking for help with this. What exactly about my
syntax (see previous post with sample) is so broken that it could
cause such a non sequitur error?
Mark
Original Message ----
Subject: Re: [EMAIL P
mment them out, I don't.
Now you know why I'm asking for help with this. What exactly about my syntax
(see previous post with sample) is so broken that it could cause such a non
sequitur error?
Mark
Original Message ----
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatel
On 14/09/2007, Mark A. Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to use rotatelogs.exe to archive my logs with Apache 2.2 running
> in Windows 2000. WHen I try to configure it the server fails to start
> and bitches about Unicode characters on line 1 of httpd.conf that aren't
> actually there. I'
I want to use rotatelogs.exe to archive my logs with Apache 2.2 running
in Windows 2000. WHen I try to configure it the server fails to start
and bitches about Unicode characters on line 1 of httpd.conf that aren't
actually there. I've read the docs repeatedly, but it's not entirely
explicit
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:50:23 -0400
Robert Gann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The apache error log has the phrase "URL file extension is restricted
> by policy".
That's not an apache error message. Could be a third-party extension
(mod_security?) or something enforced at the O/S level.
Check your
Title: Robert Gann, Ph
The apache error log has the phrase "URL file extension is restricted
by policy".
The only two AddHandler statements I have in httpd.conf are
AddHandler send-as-is asis
AddHandler type-map var
And one that appears in the middle of a
Joshua Slive wrote:
On 9/
On 9/12/07, Robert Gann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I hope this is not a FAQ, but I've searched and been unable to find an
> answer.
>
> I've just migrated to Fedora Linux 7, with Apache 2.2. When I connect to
> Apache with a Win XP computer using Mozilla Firefox, if I click on a .zip
> file,
Title: Robert Gann, Ph
I hope this is not a FAQ, but I've searched and been unable to find an
answer.
I've just migrated to Fedora Linux 7, with Apache 2.2. When I connect
to Apache with a Win XP computer using Mozilla Firefox, if I click on a
.zip file, I am offered the option to download it
access_status = OK;
}
-ascs
-Message d'origine-
De : Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Envoyé : mercredi 29 août 2007 19:18
À : users@httpd.apache.org
Objet : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.x mod_rewrite and mod_proxy and pooled
connections
Hello folks,
I have been doing some testing wi
Hello folks,
I have been doing some testing with Apache 2.2.4 recently, and one of the
things I am particularly interested in is the pooling of backend connections of
mod_proxy's as this makes it possible to maintain persistent connections to
backend systems across requests from different clien
Hello everyone,
I'm running a webserver (Server version: Apache/2.2.4 (Unix)) on Gentoo
GNU/Linux, Kernel 2.6.22 (x86, Gentoo patchset) for quite some time now, and
cannot seem to fix my problems regarding a per-user
number-of-processes-restriction I need to implement.
I'll post the sections o
On 22/06/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# apachectl -t
Syntax OK
# apachectl -k restart
Why doesn't it see ServerLimit 160?
Please read the docs :-)
"For the worker MPM, this directive in combination with ThreadLimit
sets the maximum configured value for MaxClients for the l
Hi,
My config:
PidFile /var/run/apache_aux2.pid
LockFile /var/run/accept_aux2.lock
ServerLimit 160
StartServers 20
MaxClients 4000
MinSpareThreads 25
MaxSpareThreads 75
ThreadsPerChild 25
MaxRequestsPerChild 0
# apache
On Tue, 29 May 2007 23:25:54 -0400
"Tony Guadagno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am a little confused, this statement seems to imply that the
> database drivers for mod_dbd can be loaded dynamically
>
> http://people.apache.org/~niq/dbd.html
You can build APR to enable that. But this i
Hi,
I am a little confused, this statement seems to imply that the database
drivers for mod_dbd can be loaded dynamically
http://people.apache.org/~niq/dbd.html
DBD Drivers
APR DBD Drivers are currently available for PostgreSQL and SQLite within
SVN. The apr_dbd architecture supports dy
Hi,
I do this exact thing on windows 2003. I use autoexecnt to map the drive and
then the alias will work. One think I do notice is that it is a good idea to
install the apache service with a service name down the alphabet. If you leave
the default service name (Apache2) then it does not gi
Yes, tried the UNC path as well and same result.
On 5/15/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter Wilkins wrote:
>
> Alias /test/ "z:/small/"
>
> #try to get access to mapped network drives!
>
>
...
just out of curiosity, had you tried
Alias /test //machine/share/small
...
Peter Wilkins wrote:
>
> Alias /test/ "z:/small/"
>
> #try to get access to mapped network drives!
>
>
...
just out of curiosity, had you tried
Alias /test //machine/share/small
...
instead of an explorer-managed mapping?
Bill
-
Hello,
I've been struggling with a very bizarre Apache problem. I thought I
would post on this in case this is a bug with Apache itself.
I'm running Apache 2.2.4 under WINDOZE. It came as part of the MS4W
mapping package (http://www.maptools.org/ms4w/), all included software
and versions can b
Hi Andy
> Hi, Ryan
>
> On 11 May 2007, at 15:46, Ryan Murray wrote:
>
> >> Now, what I want to do this time is configure my reverse proxy
> >> server to open several connections to each of the back end worker
> >> servers when the proxy starts to my back end hosts so that the tcp
> >> sess
Hi, Ryan
On 11 May 2007, at 15:46, Ryan Murray wrote:
Now, what I want to do this time is configure my reverse proxy
server to open several connections to each of the back end worker
servers when the proxy starts to my back end hosts so that the tcp
session can be pipelined, thus prevent
Res wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 12 May 2007, Dragon wrote:
PHP provides for this directly.
There is a restrict_base_dir setting that can be applied to each
virtual host that prevents users from accessing anything outside of
the specified directory tree.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 12 May 2007, Dragon wrote:
PHP provides for this directly.
There is a restrict_base_dir setting that can be applied to each virtual host
that prevents users from accessing anything outside of the specified
directory tree.
Correct, every
On 5/12/07, Dragon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PHP provides for this directly.
There is a restrict_base_dir setting that can be applied to each
virtual host that prevents users from accessing anything outside of
the specified directory tree.
Unless you happen to be using a library that access
Jaqui Greenlees did speak thusly:
Yes, as Nick mentioned, suexec and user/group
permissions are the common method for securing the
site(s) from this.
another option, slightly more hardware intensive is
the have each hosted site running as a separate
instance of apache chrooted so they do not hav
Sam Lavitt did speak thusly:
Based on my research, suexec only works for SSI and CGI, so it would
be pointless for providing security with php, and doing
mass-hosting, php is something in pretty common use. And I am
sorry, I mis-spoke, the mpm was mpm_perchild for apache 2.0, which
apparentl
Based on my research, suexec only works for SSI and CGI, so it
would be pointless for providing security with php, and doing mass-
hosting, php is something in pretty common use. And I am sorry, I
mis-spoke, the mpm was mpm_perchild for apache 2.0, which
apparently is abandoned and broken
> >Sam Lavitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>I am wondernig if apache 2.2 has a means to prevent a user with a
> >>site hosted on the server, from accessing another users files.
Sam -
This might be a possible solution: http://www.telana.com/peruser.php
I haven't used it, and the a
On Sat, 12 May 2007 05:00:24 -0400 (EDT)
Jaqui Greenlees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > pointless for providing security with php, and doing
security with php is an oxymoron ...
> > mass-hosting, php
> > is something in pretty common use.
> Yes, PHP is very commonly used.
> No, suexec does not
--- Sam Lavitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for my lack of clarity and experience, I came
> here looking for
> advice and help.
This we do understand :)
> Based on my research, suexec only works for SSI and
> CGI, so it would be
> pointless for providing security with php, and doing
> m
Nick Kew wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 23:01:12 -0500
Sam Lavitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am wondernig if apache 2.2 has a means to prevent a user with a
site hosted on the server, from accessing another users files.
That's the operating system's business.
(e.g.
I hav
On Fri, 11 May 2007 23:01:12 -0500
Sam Lavitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am wondernig if apache 2.2 has a means to prevent a user with a
> site hosted on the server, from accessing another users files.
That's the operating system's business.
> (e.g.
> I have /hosting/user1, and I don
On 5/11/07, Sam Lavitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am wondernig if apache 2.2 has a means to prevent a user with a site
hosted on the server, from accessing another users files. (e.g. I have
/hosting/user1, and I don't want him to be able to run a script to open
/hosting/user2/password-file)
I am wondernig if apache 2.2 has a means to prevent a user with a site
hosted on the server, from accessing another users files. (e.g. I have
/hosting/user1, and I don't want him to be able to run a script to open
/hosting/user2/password-file) I read someplace that there was a mpm for
apache
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Davidson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 2:53 PM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [Bulk] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2 and proxy_balancer -
> tcp session pipelining
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
I first posted this question to comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix but
had no response.
mod_proxy_balancer is cool - I like this, guys, thank you.
I want to load balance a number of back-end worker/target servers
that host one web application. This is easy to do :
On 4/19/07, Sebastian Kubiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I need to install software like Zend Optimizer on my machine but
system requirements for Zend Optimizer is Apache 2.2.x (Prefork mode only).
My OS: WinXP Prof. SP 2
MPM Defaults for Apache 2.2.x on Windows is mpm_winnt and now
my question
I need to install software like Zend Optimizer on my machine but
system requirements for Zend Optimizer is Apache 2.2.x (Prefork mode only).
My OS: WinXP Prof. SP 2
MPM Defaults for Apache 2.2.x on Windows is mpm_winnt and now
my question is: Can I install Apache on WinXP with other MPM mode,
The following module in Apache httpd.conf
"
ProxyRequests Off
ProxyPreserveHost On
ProxyPass / http://localhost:/
ProxyPassReverse / http://localhost:/
"
results in displaying the default 'Welcome to Oracle Containers for J2EE...'
either from my localhost or from the outside world.
Howe
On 14.03.07 18:16, Sylvain Bolay wrote:
> May I use mod_proxy with mod_proxy_ftp for reverse proxying to a lan proftpd
> server?
no. FTP protocol can not be proxied, so the only usage of FTP with proxy is
telling FTP client to use proxy, so it will talk to the proxy using HTTP
protocol.
--
Matus
Hello Everybody,
May I use mod_proxy with mod_proxy_ftp for reverse proxying to a lan proftpd
server?
Thanks for your help.
Sylvain
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.
Ok thanks
I will check it with top command
Regards,
Arun
Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/1/07, arun kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> No i am not measuring memory per process and i am adding all the RSS of the
> httpd process of particular apache instance to find total memory usa
On 3/1/07, arun kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
No i am not measuring memory per process and i am adding all the RSS of the
httpd process of particular apache instance to find total memory usage every
one sec.
In prefork(No of process will be more than worker) also i am using the same
pr
Hi,
No i am not measuring memory per process and i am adding all the RSS of the
httpd process of particular apache instance to find total memory usage every
one sec.
In prefork(No of process will be more than worker) also i am using the same
process and i am adding all the RSS of
On 2/28/07, arun kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
I am using the below command to monitor the physical memory.
ps -e -o pcpu,vsz,rss,pid,args |grep -v grep | grep "apacheprojectname"
Below is the sample output for the worker module
0.0 34608 32744 25609
/local/home/kumarar3/apache/aw
Hi All,
I am using the below command to monitor the physical memory.
ps -e -o pcpu,vsz,rss,pid,args |grep -v grep | grep "apacheprojectname"
Below is the sample output for the worker module
0.0 34608 32744 25609 /local/home/kumarar3/apache/aws/bin/httpd -f
/local/home/kuma
On 2/27/07, arun kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We are using solaris 8 and i compiled the apache 2.2 using the below option
./configure --prefix=/local/apache/aws --enable-ssl --enable-proxy
--enable-proxy-connect --enable-proxy-http --enable-cache
--enable-disk-cache --enable-mods-shared=all
We are using solaris 8 and i compiled the apache 2.2 using the below option
./configure --prefix=/local/apache/aws --enable-ssl --enable-proxy
--enable-proxy-connect --enable-proxy-http --enable-cache --enable-disk-cache
--enable-mods-shared=all --with-mpm=worker .
I disable the defl
On 2/26/07, arun kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
We are in the process of moving apache 1.3 to apache 2.2we migrated and
done the load testing and monitoringwe find that in apache 2.2 physical
memory usage is more than apache 1.3we added cache and deflate module in
apache 2.
Hi All,
We are in the process of moving apache 1.3 to apache 2.2we migrated and
done the load testing and monitoringwe find that in apache 2.2 physical
memory usage is more than apache 1.3we added cache and deflate module in
apache 2.2.
Below find my apache 1.3 and 2.2 ht
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 01:23:07PM -0800, John Stewart wrote:
> Problem description as best I currently understand it:
>
> We are trying to combine two MoinMoin wikis onto a single host. The two
> wikis were previously known by DNS names of wiki and kiwi respectively,
> and we want to preserve tha
Problem description as best I currently understand it:
We are trying to combine two MoinMoin wikis onto a single host. The two
wikis were previously known by DNS names of wiki and kiwi respectively,
and we want to preserve that functionality for our user base.
When we move to a third host, we're
Hi,
I am using Apache 2.2 as loadbalancer for a JBOSS-J2EE-Cluster. The
incoming calls are redirected by ajp.
This is the configuration I added to the httpd.conf
ProxyPass /FOnetConsole !
ProxyPass / balancer://FOnetCluster/
BalancerMember ajp://wnasw022:8009
BalancerMember ajp://kpmg1:8
Dear list,
I've just migrated an I386-Linux-Debian Sarge to Edge. Since Edge
includes Apache 2.2, this means I also had to move from Apache 2.0.x
to Apache 2.2
Although I know that Joshua is going to scold me ;), I've set up 3
SSL-VHosts on one Debian-Server, all having the same IP. This is a
de
> -Original Message-
> From: arun kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 9:26 AM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.x modules
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> Any difference is there in handling(Configuring)
Hi Guys,
Any difference is there in handling(Configuring) the
below modules between apache 1.3.x and apache 2.2.x
- server side includes
- mod_cgi
- mod_setenvif
- mod_rewrite
Arun
--- Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Fenlason, Josh [mailto:[EMAIL P
Ian Brandt wrote:
> However when I try to authenticate the following appears in error.log:
>
> [error] GROUP: ibrandt not in required group(s).
I seem to have solved the issue. I found the text of the error
message verbatim in the mod_auth_sys_group source. I had LoadModule
directives for mod_a
I've just upgraded to 2.2.3 from 2.0.54. I've reviewed the docs
regarding the auth changes. My config is:
DAV svn
SVNParentPath /var/lib/svn
SVNListParentPath on
SVNPathAuthz off
AuthType Basic
AuthName "Subversion Repository"
AuthBasicProvider file
AuthUserFi
I upgraded my apache to version 2.2 and now when I start it, if the
auth_kerb module is enabled I get a Segmentation Fault.
Using debian with the unstable branch. These are the versions:
- libapache2-mod-auth-kerb 5.1-1
- apache2.2-common 2.2.3-2
- libkrb53 1.4.4-3
I
Hello,
I'm trying to achieve the following scenario using Apache 2.2:
- http://localhost/aaa/bbb?a=b must be proxied to
http://:1234/aaa/bbb?a=b (where is
either jack or jill)
- http://localhost/aaa/bbb?b=c must be proxied to
http://:1234/aaa/bbb?b=c
- http://localhost/aaa m
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
