[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 catches SIGTERM and shuts down

Hi everyone, I administer a CentOS 4.6 server (use the CentOS plus repo) that runs Apache 2.0.59 and PHP 5.1.6 For the past few days the httpd processes have been locking up (the parent processes still seem to be there), but the rest of it comes to a grinding halt. The server itself is still acce

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59

Hi everyone, I administer a CentOS 4.6 server (use the CentOS plus repo) that runs Apache 2.0.59 and PHP 5.1.6 For the past few days the httpd processes have been locking up (the parent processes still seem to be there), but the rest of it comes to a grinding halt. The server itself is still acce

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 on non-standard port & interactions with mod_jk/Tomcat

Hello, I currently have a web farm behind a load balancer. The load balancer is configured to listen only on port 80 and to send requests to a particular URL, say "/foo", to TCP port 5001 on the web servers where I have an Apache 2.0.59 instance running. "/foo" is actually a JkMount to a Tomcat

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 / ssl memory leak

Hi, We have setup an Apache 2.0.59 along with mod_ssl and are executing a load run for Apache resources over https. We are seeing continuous memory growth in Apache process during the course of the load run. I we do a similar load run using Apache 2.0.59 over http (non-ssl), we do not see any

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 authnetication in OpenLdap

Hello, I have the following problem: I configured apache to authenticate in an OpenLdap and Keep getting the following error in the log file: [Mon Jun 18 16:31:48 2007] [debug] mod_auth_ldap.c(337): [client 127.0.0.1] [796] auth_ldap authenticate: using URL ldap://server:3939/o=root?uid?sub

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 LDAP authentication

Hi, I am currently using Apache 1.3.28 for which I have customized mod_ldap_auth.c file. When I upgraded Apache to 2.0.59, this module is not getting loaded and Apache is not coming up Where Can I get source file for mod_ldap_auth.c file for 1.3.28 version and also for 2.0.59 version, so that I

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 segfaults on HP-UX with SSL Certificate

Hi All, On HP-UX 11.23 , httpd does a segfault when ClientCertificates are used for authentication. This happens only on a multi-cpu, multi-threaded environment. After debugging found that the problem is double free of the certificate in ssl_engine_io.c --snip-- /

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 segfaults on CentOS 4.3 with SSL

On 4/18/07, Chad Morland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How can I debug these segfaults in order to determine the exact cause of the problem? http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html#crashes Joshua. - The official User-To-User

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 segfaults on CentOS 4.3 with SSL

Recently we deployed a high volume SSL site on a custom RPM build of Apache 2.0.59 running on CentOS 4.3. Things ran happily for about 5 days before we started noticing segfaults in our logs along with blank pages for that particular SSL vhost. Restarting apache makes the problem disappear for an

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 Binary with /htdocs for red hat ent lnx 4

Folks,Can somebody share the link for Apache 2.0.59 Binary with /htdocs for red hat ent lnx 4? The link in the following doesn't have documents and apache can't start. thx a lot http://mirrors.isc.org/pub/apache/httpd/binaries/rpm/i386/thx Tim

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 build fails on Solaris 10 x86

Hi everyone,   I cant build Apache 2.0.59 on Solaris 10 x86 machine. I ran configure with   ./configure --prefix=/export/home/infwaer/apache2059latest/worker --enable-proxy=shared --enable-so --enable-ssl --with-ssl=/export/home/infwaer/apache2059latest/worker/openssl --with-mpm=worker  

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 : mod_proxy error caused by rewrite ?

Hi all . is this just a re-write > mod_proxy error ? We have the following rules in our Apache Reverse Proxy : RewriteRule ^/sap/(.*) https://:8443/sap/$1 [P,NC,L] RewriteRule ^/scripts/(.*) https://:8443/scripts/$1 [P,NC,L] ProxyPass /scripts https://:8443/scripts ProxyPass /sap https://:8443/sap

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 Reverse Proxy - Set Content Length ( for HTTPS POSTS) to prevent proxy erros

Hi all , running our Apache 2.0 Reverse Proxy over https we noticed that HTTP 1.1 connections to the backend server are causing Proxy errors for POSTs only (all GETs are fine) . We want to set Content-Length or Content-Chunking for POSTs as this is a known problem for web servers (especially with

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 with SSL installation issue.

Well the server was originally running 1.3.33, so I was just installing 2.0.59 in a completely different location. But I did manage to find a fix for it all. It appears that 0.6.3 was installed on the server (or something close to that I can't recall the exact version) and it was installed in /

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 with SSL installation issue.

One Guess ... did you actually blast config.cache and rerun your ./config.nice or did you simply try installing over 0.9.8b ... one trouble is that httpd's configure will remember the original openssl and it's discovered options. Richard de Vries wrote: > I remember seeing a similiar thread somew

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 with SSL installation issue.

Thanks for that, I did some digging and it turns out an old version of Openssl is on the server and it looks like there's a conflict even after I put in --with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl (where 0.9.8b is and where 0.9.8.a was). I'm going to re-compile Openssl to use the paths of the old version. Hey,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 with SSL installation issue.

Hey, have a look at this thread. Maybe some of the suggestions will work for you ... keep us posted: http://www.howtoforge.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-1557.html --- "Tom Ray [Lists]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 0.9.8a was the security fix and 0.9.8b was a > compatibility fix. The > problem

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 with SSL installation issue.

0.9.8a was the security fix and 0.9.8b was a compatibility fix. The problem is, I had 0.9.8a already installed on the machine and I had the same exact error. I thought upgrading to 0.9.8b would fix the problem, but it didn't. And I couldn't find anything really detailed when I Googled the error

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 with SSL installation issue.

I remember seeing a similiar thread somewhere and I seem to recall it had to do with openssl 0.9.8b. Is openssl 0.9.8b a bugfix release over 0.9.8a, or a security fix? If 0.9.8b is only a bug fix, you could try it with 0.9.8a? --- "Tom Ray [Lists]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was able to inst

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 with SSL installation issue.

I was able to install Apache 2.0.59 without SSL on this server but we need SSL support now. I've tried to re-compile Apache without any luck. I can configure it just fine but I run "make" that's when I get an error. I'm getting this: modules/ssl/.libs/mod_ssl.a(ssl_engine_kernel.o): In functio

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 - segmentation faults: signal 11, with no modules loaded

I'm new to this list and sorry that my first post is quite so gritty. But Hi anyway and Sorry for the long post. I have a FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE (GENERIC) Server running Apache 2.0.59. I'm getting regular segmentation faults (several a minute) on this server. Logs say: pid 563 (httpd), uid 1004:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 with openssl 0.9.8b compilation questions ?

Hi, When I compile apache 2.2.2 with openssl 0.9.8b (gcc 3.4.x, linux and solaris) I can start Apache with ssl successfully. Openssl: ./config --prefix=/usr/opt/openssl0.9.8b -static-libgcc Apache: ./configure --prefix=/usr/opt/apache2.2.2 \ --enable-so --enable-mods-shar