On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Angelo Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> any idea what I'm missing here?
What is in your error log?
Is there anyhting in your tomcat log?
What is the output of apache2ctl -S?
Krist
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bremgarten b. Bern, Switzerland
--
A: It r
Hi,
I use Ubuntu 8.0.10 which has Apache HTTP and Tomcat 6 installed, and I'm
trying out the virtual hosting thing, my server's ip is 192.168.1.1, if I
open http://192.168.1.1:8080 it goes to a tomcat app, now I'd like to use
proxy so that I can do :
www.jupiter.com which will open http://192.16
On Dec 3, 2008, at 3:45 PM, Bruno - e-comBR wrote:
I want to know how much Apache's HTTPD takes the advantages of
multiple CPUs. Is there any difference about performance betwen using
worker or prefork as MPM??
Depends on your operating system architecture. However, in any
situation the de
Hello all,
I want to know how much Apache's HTTPD takes the advantages of
multiple CPUs. Is there any difference about performance betwen using
worker or prefork as MPM??
Being a little "out of topic", let me ask you... On a Linux SMP
system, does a n Core processor works like n processors?? Is t
Hey EricI changed #Timeout 120#MaxKeepAliveRequests 100##StartServers 8#MinSpareServers5#MaxSpareServers
20#ServerLimit 256#MaxClients 256#MaxRequestsPerChild
4000#to:Timeout 300MaxKeepAliveRequests 0StartServers 30MinSpareServers5MaxSpareServers
50ServerLimi
Tom Belmount wrote:
Hey guys, Im having a problem where my websites are loading slow in IE only.
Might IE be the cause then, rather than the effect ?
It started doing this after i made changes to my httpd.conf file.
Such as ? come on, give us a clue ..
At the same time i also installed eacc
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Tom Belmount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Im having a problem where my websites are loading slow in IE only. It
> started doing this after i made changes to my httpd.conf file. At the same
> time i also installed eaccelerator.
What did you change?
Hav
Hey guys,Im having a problem where my websites are loading slow in IE only. It
started doing this after i made changes to my httpd.conf file. At the same time
i also installed eaccelerator.I'm finding it hard to find/fix the problem. Im
still very new with this. Not all of the virtual hosts run
Hi All,
I was adding anpther apache node to the cluster. All the nodes have RHEL5
installed on it. I downloaded the source httpd-2.2.10 and compile it using
commands:
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --enable-module=so
--enable-rewrite=shared --enable-cgi=shared --enable-unique_id=shared
--
Short: I need to cross-compile modules which use apxs, but apxs fails.
Long: I've tried the mod_python list, since that's the list dealing
with my problem module, however after a few rounds of emails, it
became apparent that the problem seems to be with the fact that there
isn't a version of apxs
Hello,
We're running Apache 2.0.52 on RHEL 4.6 with mod_ssl. Recently, we had to
significantly increase our Apache Timeout value to please some
applications that don't split off the bulk of their calculations as
background jobs.
Doing this of cause, means that connections can get stuck for a long
sojin wrote:
Hi,
I've installed Apache 2.2.10 and PHP 5 on Vista.
But when I tried to access a page (index.php with phpinfo() embedded) at my
localhost, the php informataion page is getting displayed for 1-2 seconds
and "Apache HTTP server has stopped working" window is appearing and the
index.p
Hi,
I've installed Apache 2.2.10 and PHP 5 on Vista.
But when I tried to access a page (index.php with phpinfo() embedded) at my
localhost, the php informataion page is getting displayed for 1-2 seconds
and "Apache HTTP server has stopped working" window is appearing and the
index.php page is not
gracias Andre. buen consejo.voy a desintalar la ver 1.3
--- El mar, 25/11/08, André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
De: André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Asunto: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.10 doesnt upgrade
Para: users@httpd.apache.org
Fecha: martes, 25 noviembre, 2008 10:
whitehorse, canada y tu?
--- El mar, 25/11/08, Jorge Ramirez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
De: Jorge Ramirez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Asunto: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.10 doesnt upgrade
Para: users@httpd.apache.org
Fecha: martes, 25 noviembre, 2008 10:01
no se donde esta instalado
para v 1.3y el otro de la
ver 2.9.En ke pais y ciudad estas?
From: rocio mejia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 8:38:06 AM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.10 doesnt upgrade
hola
ya entiendo. apache
he.org
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 8:38:06 AM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.10 doesnt upgrade
hola
ya entiendo. apachectl es un alias del demonio httpd. pero me he dado cuenta
que cuando enciendo mi MAC viene por defecto el httpd v. 1.3 , luego yo mato
ese proceso y uso el apachectl
@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.10 doesnt upgrade
hola
ya entiendo. apachectl es un alias del demonio httpd. pero me he dado cuenta
que cuando enciendo mi MAC viene por defecto el httpd v. 1.3 , luego yo mato
ese proceso y uso el apachectl de mi instalacion 2.9. Do you know
sáb, 22/11/08, Jorge Ramirez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
De: Jorge Ramirez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Asunto: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.10 doesnt upgrade
Para: users@httpd.apache.org
Fecha: sábado, 22 noviembre, 2008 4:12
el apachectl es un alias de "httpd" necesitas ver
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:27 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MartinC wrote:
>> (OS 10013)An attempt was made to access a socket in a way forbidden by its
>> acces
>> s permissions. : make_sock: could not bind to address 0.0.0.0:80
>> no listening sockets available, shutting d
MartinC wrote:
> (OS 10013)An attempt was made to access a socket in a way forbidden by its
> acces
> s permissions. : make_sock: could not bind to address 0.0.0.0:80
> no listening sockets available, shutting down
> Unable to open logs
> Note the errors or messages above, and press the key to ex
I get the following error on installation:
Installing the Apache2.2 service
The Apache2.2 service is successfully installed.
Testing httpd.conf
Errors reported here must be corrected before the service can be started.
httpd.exe: Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified domain
CTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 1:33:57 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.10 doesnt upgrade
hola jorge
uso el apachectl command. esta mal?
--- El dom, 16/11/08, Jorge Ramirez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
De: Jorge Ramirez <[EMAIL PROTECTE
hola jorge
uso el apachectl command. esta mal?
--- El dom, 16/11/08, Jorge Ramirez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
De: Jorge Ramirez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Asunto: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.10 doesnt upgrade
Para: users@httpd.apache.org
Fecha: domingo, 16 noviembre, 2008 11:15
rocio
he.org
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 4:32:28 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.10 doesnt upgrade
It's from Finkproject website what I wrote about MAC versions .
I did check for httpd/apachectl and , yes, I have more than one but I made
sure no httpd processwere running and whe
rocio mejia wrote:
> could it be /because I have OSX 10.3.9 and only supports up to apache2.0.59?
With respect to sendfile and several other features, 10.3 is simply weak.
If you want 2.2 (2.10 - wtf you talking about, willis?) then you probably
should jump up to 10.5.current.
--
nt to uninstall all my apache, any command that do a clean
uninstallation?
thanks
--- El sáb, 15/11/08, Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
De: Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Asunto: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.10 doesnt upgrade
Para: users@httpd.apache.org
Fecha: sábado, 15 nov
rocio mejia wrote:
could it be /because I have OSX 10.3.9 and only supports up to
apache2.0.59?
I don't know.. Is that from Mac's website or is that stated on Apache's
website? If that were the case, you'd have different problems than what
you're describing.
I read this in fink page. I trie
upgrade with source files and
through fink no error msg but version doesnt change. Give me a
clue ? pls
--- El vie, 14/11/08, Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
De: Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Asunto: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.10 doesnt upgrade
Para: users@httpd.apache.or
Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Asunto: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.10 doesnt upgrade
Para: users@httpd.apache.org
Fecha: viernes, 14 noviembre, 2008 11:50
rocio mejia wrote:
> I upgraded Apache from 2.0.59 to 2.10 but version still shows 2.0.59 Any
ideas why this?
> I did all the steps
rocio mejia wrote:
I upgraded Apache from 2.0.59 to 2.10 but version still shows 2.0.59
Any ideas why this?
I did all the steps make, make install many times ...
Umm With as vague as a question as that is, my guess is you have
more than one copy of apache, and your path is pointing to the
I upgraded Apache from 2.0.59 to 2.10 but version still shows 2.0.59 Any ideas
why this?
I did all the steps make, make install many times ...
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
I have been trying for the past 3 weeks to get following compiled all
together:
I used the following software source tarballs
Apache_1.3.41
Mod_ssl-2.8.31_1.3.41
Openssl-0.9.8i
Libmcrypt-2.5.8
MySQL-5.0.67
PHP-5.2.6
At first I figured I would use a
Hi,
I have been trying to use Apache 2.0.59 and Apache 2.2.10 with IPv6
support on Windows but no luck. Has anyone been successful in setting
any of these versions up for IPv6 on Windows ?
Apache 2.2.10 with IPv4 support works fine on Windows but with IPv6
support it does not work. I hit exactly
check if ajp port is already in use or not.
If hte port is already in use tomcat internally increments the port by one
and starts listening to that port for requests.
In this scenario apache won't be able to forward your requests to respective
node.
kashif_tomcat wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> i am doi
Hi All,
I downloaded httpd-2.0.63 and after ./configure make and make
install.
I gave the command
./bin/apachectl start
but I get an error that
Syntax error on line 95 of conf/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /home/y/lib/mod_tagweb_fed.so into server:
/home/y/lib/mod_tagweb_fed.so: cannot
ember 05, 2008 10:43 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache fails to start as service
Hello,
I'm running Apache 2.2.10 on Windows 2003 EE. I have a directory
aliased to a
mapped network drive. I have setup a user which has permissions to
access these
drives
AIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 10:43 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache fails to start as service
Hello,
I'm running Apache 2.2.10 on Windows 2003 EE. I have a directory
aliased to a
mapped network drive. I have setup a user which has p
> -Original Message-
> From: Timothy Orme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 10:43 AM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache fails to start as service
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm running Apache 2.2
I install Apache as reverse proxy for point from a DMZ server to two
intranet server.
For email server all work ok.
The second server (video1) is a linux server with webcam for a door access
control.
With the second server i receive the logon request ,but after i don't see
the page with images.
2008/11/11 André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> dave selby wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> OK ... I did not realize that there would be competition, the CPU load
>> is not 100% so I don't understand why apache and firefox would be
>> competing ?
>>
> It is a bit difficult to tell what is really happening, whi
dave selby wrote:
[...]
OK ... I did not realize that there would be competition, the CPU load
is not 100% so I don't understand why apache and firefox would be
competing ?
It is a bit difficult to tell what is really happening, which is why it
may be better trying to isolate the different asp
> I am not the specialist here, but just looking at your two top displays
> above, am I right in suspecting that you are running this XmlHttpRequest
> test from a firefox browser which runs on the same machine as the Apache you
> are testing ?
Yep, thats the case
if that is the case, it would be
dave selby wrote:
Hi All,
I have apache2 running AOK serving a web page that calls a xmlhttp
request every second and downloads a jpeg image approx 28k every
second. top reveals ...
3.3% CPU and 0.8% Memory
16089 dave 20 0 241m 85m 29m R 7.3 6.8 6:32.20 firefox-2-bin
31187 www-da
Hi All,
I have apache2 running AOK serving a web page that calls a xmlhttp
request every second and downloads a jpeg image approx 28k every
second. top reveals ...
3.3% CPU and 0.8% Memory
16089 dave 20 0 241m 85m 29m R 7.3 6.8 6:32.20 firefox-2-bin
31187 www-data 20 0 24956 10
Frank Kimbell wrote:
I tried that, and get this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] web]# su apache
bash-3.00$ cd /website/nfs-directory
bash: cd: /website/nfs-directory: Stale NFS file handle
So also on the shell line, it gives this error...
What I forgot to mention is that, when I do this as root, I get no
> I tried that, and get this:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] web]# su apache
> bash-3.00$ cd /website/nfs-directory
> bash: cd: /website/nfs-directory: Stale NFS file handle
>
> So also on the shell line, it gives this error...
What I forgot to mention is that, when I do this as root, I get no problems...
Hi,
thanks for your reply.
I tried that, and get this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] web]# su apache
bash-3.00$ cd /website/nfs-directory
bash: cd: /website/nfs-directory: Stale NFS file handle
So also on the shell line, it gives this error...
--
André Warnier wrote:
> Savio Dias wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there anyone who can help resolve this issue ?
>>
> Hi.
> What the Debian packager (through the apt-get program) and Eric are
> telling you, is that the PHP5 package removes mpm-worker and replaces it
> by mpm-prefork for a good reason.
>
Savio Dias wrote:
Hello,
Is there anyone who can help resolve this issue ?
Hi.
What the Debian packager (through the apt-get program) and Eric are
telling you, is that the PHP5 package removes mpm-worker and replaces it
by mpm-prefork for a good reason.
The good reason is probably that mpm-w
Hello,
Is there anyone who can help resolve this issue ?
Thanks
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Savio Dias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am using Ubuntu 8.04.
>>
>> I have installed apache2 using apt-get, th
Frank Kimbell wrote:
Hello,
I am trying a script (PHP) that writes files to disk.
Now, writing the files locally works file, if I have a write-to
directory owned apache:apache.
Files created are owned apache:apache by default.
But, I want to try this:
I have an NFS share that has a large amount
Hello,
I am trying a script (PHP) that writes files to disk.
Now, writing the files locally works file, if I have a write-to
directory owned apache:apache.
Files created are owned apache:apache by default.
But, I want to try this:
I have an NFS share that has a large amount of space. I want the f
Hi All,
i am doing clustering with load balance environment and got stuck with an
issue. can anyone please help me ... below is scenario.
i have two servers running tomcat 1 and 2 (running in cluster)and apache is
on server with tomcat 1.
here is load balancing entries.
BalancerMember
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Savio Dias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using Ubuntu 8.04.
>
> I have installed apache2 using apt-get, this installs the mpm-worker mode.
> However when i try to install php5 using apt-get, it removes the
> mpm-worker and installs prefork.
>
> I need
Hello,
I am using Ubuntu 8.04.
I have installed apache2 using apt-get, this installs the mpm-worker mode.
However when i try to install php5 using apt-get, it removes the
mpm-worker and installs prefork.
I need to keep the worker mode intact..please suggest.
Hello,
I'm trying to build apache 2.2.9 on AIX 5.2 and run it in different
from installation location.
I get the following error:
0509-036 Cannot load program ./httpd because of the following errors:
0509-022 Cannot load module /new_location/lib/libaprutil-1.so.
0509-150
Hello,
I'm running Apache 2.2.10 on Windows 2003 EE. I have a directory aliased to a mapped network drive. I have setup a user which has permissions to access these drives, and have specified that the
apache service should be run as that user (By changing the services "Log on" account). However
fig:A
RewriteRule /B/.* - E=Config:B
Cheers
Stephen
-Original Message-
From: Nick Kew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 3 November 2008 8:25 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache - URL based environment variables
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:04:32 +1000
&qu
Stephen
-Original Message-
From: Nick Kew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 3 November 2008 8:25 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache - URL based environment variables
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:04:32 +1000
"Stephen Brennan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
Hi, which version is Vista compatible? Thanks
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:04:32 +1000
"Stephen Brennan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to figure out how to configure appache webserver to set
> different UNIX environment variables depending on the url text
> entered.
RewriteRule.
Capture the path component you want, and use
Hi all,
I am trying to figure out how to configure appache webserver to set
different UNIX environment variables depending on the url text entered.
eg.
/A
would be required to set an enviroment variable Config=A
and
/B
would be required to set an environment variable Config=B
These two urls w
For posterity sake (and easy archive searching for the solution), here's
all that's needed to patch mod_ssl:
diff -PurN mod_ssl-2.8.31-1.3.41.orig/pkg.sslmod/libssl.module
mod_ssl-2.8.31-1.3.41/pkg.sslmod/libssl.module
--- mod_ssl-2.8.31-1.3.41.orig/pkg.sslmod/libssl.module 2006-05-08
03:15:37.000
El Lunes, 27 de Octubre de 2008, Tom Evans escribió:
> On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:34 +0100, André Warnier wrote:
> > Adrián Ribao Martínez wrote:
> > > El Lunes, 27 de Octubre de 2008, André Warnier escribió:
> > >> Adrián Ribao Martínez wrote:
> > >>> Hello. I just bought a domain name containing sp
I have solved it, I just needed to convert the url.
I used this page:
http://www.dominiosidn.com/conversionidn
Thank you.
El Lunes, 27 de Octubre de 2008, André Warnier escribió:
> André Warnier wrote:
> > Adrián Ribao Martínez wrote:
> >> El Lunes, 27 de Octubre de 2008, André Warnier escribió:
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:34 +0100, André Warnier wrote:
> Adrián Ribao Martínez wrote:
> > El Lunes, 27 de Octubre de 2008, André Warnier escribió:
> >> Adrián Ribao Martínez wrote:
> >>> Hello. I just bought a domain name containing spanish special characters.
> >>> the domain contains the word: d
This is not working either...
I don't know what else I can do.
El Lunes, 27 de Octubre de 2008, André Warnier escribió:
> Adrián Ribao Martínez wrote:
> > El Lunes, 27 de Octubre de 2008, André Warnier escribió:
> >> Adrián Ribao Martínez wrote:
> >>> Hello. I just bought a domain name containin
André Warnier wrote:
Adrián Ribao Martínez wrote:
El Lunes, 27 de Octubre de 2008, André Warnier escribió:
Adrián Ribao Martínez wrote:
Hello. I just bought a domain name containing spanish special
characters.
the domain contains the word: diseño
but now I can't make it work with apache, afte
Adrián Ribao Martínez wrote:
El Lunes, 27 de Octubre de 2008, André Warnier escribió:
Adrián Ribao Martínez wrote:
Hello. I just bought a domain name containing spanish special characters.
the domain contains the word: diseño
but now I can't make it work with apache, after creating and
configur
El Lunes, 27 de Octubre de 2008, André Warnier escribió:
> Adrián Ribao Martínez wrote:
> > Hello. I just bought a domain name containing spanish special characters.
> > the domain contains the word: diseño
> > but now I can't make it work with apache, after creating and
> > configurating a virtual
Adrián Ribao Martínez wrote:
Hello. I just bought a domain name containing spanish special characters. the
domain contains the word: diseño
but now I can't make it work with apache, after creating and configurating a
virtualhost is not working.
I changed the domain and everything was ok. But I
Hello. I just bought a domain name containing spanish special characters. the
domain contains the word: diseño
but now I can't make it work with apache, after creating and configurating a
virtualhost is not working.
I changed the domain and everything was ok. But I need it to work with apache.
@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache process PPID=1 in Solaris
Prathima Dandapani -X (pdandapa - HCL at Cisco) wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> When I start Apache 2.2.10 in Solaris 9 server from the
> shell,I see the PPID of Apache process as 1.
> Is the P
Prathima Dandapani -X (pdandapa - HCL at Cisco) wrote:
Hi All,
When I start Apache 2.2.10 in Solaris 9 server from the shell,I
see the PPID of Apache process as 1.
Is the PPID 1 means the Apache process is orphaned?
Is this behaviour normal?
Yes.
This
Hi All,
When I start Apache 2.2.10 in Solaris 9 server from the shell,I
see the PPID of Apache process as 1.
Is the PPID 1 means the Apache process is orphaned?
Is this behaviour normal?
Thanks and Regards,
Prathima.
Hi;
I have a collection of web pages that use SSI to parse pieces of
$DOCUMENT_NAME and present those bits in the HTML output. Here's the code:
This takes a file name like "z1234_aba_abt.html" and spits back "Z1234
Option ABA Hyperlinks".
This works fine in both Apache 1.3.33 and 2.2.3;
Dear list,
I am having trouble pinpointing why our web servers are under load.
This is an in house built PHP application. (mod_php5)
Current apache configuration:
MaxKeepAliveRequests 1000
KeepAliveTimeout 5
StartServers 5
MinSpareServers 5
MaxSpareServers 10
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 00:20 +0200, Leslie Herps || Novacle B.V. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> and thank you for your reply!
>
> > Have you read the documentation on these settings?, it is fairly
> > helpfull in getting a basic idea of what to tune.
>
> Yes, I have. It tells me what it is and does, but doe
o put in the
corresponding effort.
while true do
begin
research
measure
implement
analize
end
Best Regards
> -Original Message-
> From: Leslie Herps || Novacle B.V. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 October 2008 23:20
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [EMA
Hello,
and thank you for your reply!
> Have you read the documentation on these settings?, it is fairly
> helpfull in getting a basic idea of what to tune.
Yes, I have. It tells me what it is and does, but does not tell me any
recommended settings...
> Other than that it really depends on what
ssing through
your site before you start tuning.
Regards
> -Original Message-
> From: Leslie Herps [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 October 2008 02:00
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Worker MPM: Optimizing
>
> Hello,
>
> I
No luck yet...
Address of HTML from server1:
http://MyPC.aabbcc.com/LocalServer.htm (I use my PC, win server2003, as
server1 for this test).
In this HTML page, this is my JavaScrip code:
var oXmlHttpRequest = new ActiveXObject("MSXML2.XMLHTTP");
oXmlHttpRequest.open("GET",
"http://MyPC.aabbcc.c
Hello,
I switched from a Apach 1.3 to an Apache 2.0 config. Those were prefork.
Now, I switched to a 2.2 Worker MPM.
Seems to work GREAT!
Now, I use this on different servers...
Back in the 1.3 days, someone gave me a simple formula for the MaxClients
and Threads, etc... Those numbers were rela
Hello.
Thank you very much for your detailed replay.
You did clear my point - its the first option you wrote:
HTML page from server1 to client and this HTML page makes XMLHTTPRequest to
server2.
As far as I know the HTML page can only "connect" to its origin server which
is server1.
So, how can
ampo wrote:
Hello.
My scenario is client "calling" server1 and server1 is "calling", by
xmlHTTPRequest, to server2.
server2 has to return xml data to server1 and to the client.
my general broblem is cross-domain, as server1 and server2 are not in the
same domain.
Could you, please, clear this f
Hello.
My scenario is client "calling" server1 and server1 is "calling", by
xmlHTTPRequest, to server2.
server2 has to return xml data to server1 and to the client.
my general broblem is cross-domain, as server1 and server2 are not in the
same domain.
Could you, please, clear this for me:
Is APA
André Warnier wrote:
> Andre Hübner wrote:
>> Hi List,
>>
>> try to compile older Apache 1.3.37 on opensuse 11 64bit. I have some
>> Problems with my configure-line.
>> configure tries to find my base-libs in wrong folders:
>>
>> Error: Cannot find SSL library files in any of the following dirs:
>>
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Yoom Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ** This syntax and options will not allow any network to access *
>
> Options None
> Order deny,allow
> Deny from all
> Allow from 172.10.10.0/255.255.255.0
>
Show your error log and access log.
Allow from all
Thank you,
Y
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Covener" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 1:48:23 PM (GMT-0500) America/New_York
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache directory access & Suse AppArmor
On
Andre Hübner wrote:
Hi List,
try to compile older Apache 1.3.37 on opensuse 11 64bit. I have some
Problems with my configure-line.
configure tries to find my base-libs in wrong folders:
Error: Cannot find SSL library files in any of the following dirs:
Error: . /lib /usr/lib /usr/local/lib
S
Hi List,
try to compile older Apache 1.3.37 on opensuse 11 64bit. I have some
Problems with my configure-line.
configure tries to find my base-libs in wrong folders:
Error: Cannot find SSL library files in any of the following dirs:
Error: . /lib /usr/lib /usr/local/lib
SSL is installed but F
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Yoom Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric,
>
> I got most of what you described but there are still something unclear to me.
> If I want the WHOLE directory /images to allow view by the OS (AppArmor) and
> deny view via the network by
> every other network exc
America/New_York
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache directory access & Suse AppArmor
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Yoom Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric,
>
> It seems if I enable /srv/www/domainroot/images/* via AppArmor then
> I don't even need to declare in
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Yoom Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric,
>
> It seems if I enable /srv/www/domainroot/images/* via AppArmor then
> I don't even need to declare in Apache configuration
> file. Is this true?
It's true that making the files unreadable via the OS prevents Apa
Eric said:
>
>
> This should be a physical on-disk directory, not a URL-path or a
> directory name under your document root. If there's no literal
> directory /images/ in your filesystem, this snippet configuration
> never applies.
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 07:52 -0500, Yoom Nguyen wrote:
> Eric,
>
From: "Eric Covener" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 10:53:38 PM (GMT-0500) America/New_York
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache directory access & Suse AppArmor
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Yoom Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Yoom Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone tell me what is the different between Apache2 directory access as
> compare to AppArmor come with SuSE?
They're independent, and you need to satisfy both to successfully
serve a file. Just like Apache config and t
Can anyone tell me what is the different between Apache2 directory access as
compare to AppArmor come with SuSE?
I though SuSe AppArmor allow administrator to control the files, directory
system level access. And
If you define something like these syntax below it will allow administrator
On 10/14/08, MierMier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MierMier wrote:
> > I have an appche server 2.x. + PHP, And I woundered rather it is possible
> > to output the same page (i.e. "a.php") for a request of whatever page.
> >
> > I will give an examples:
> > if the client try to reach "/hello/i
1 - 100 of 3242 matches
Mail list logo
