Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] APR and APR-UTIL

2007-10-08 Thread Vincent Bray
On 08/10/2007, Melanie Pfefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi > > sorry to insist on this thread: > > bash-3.00# ./httpd -V > Server version: Apache/2.0.59 > Server built: Oct 8 2007 19:15:01 > Server's Module Magic Number: 20020903:12 > Server loaded: APR 0.9.12, APR-UTIL 0.9.12 > Compiled usi

[EMAIL PROTECTED] APR and APR-UTIL

2007-10-08 Thread Melanie Pfefer
hi sorry to insist on this thread: bash-3.00# ./httpd -V Server version: Apache/2.0.59 Server built: Oct 8 2007 19:15:01 Server's Module Magic Number: 20020903:12 Server loaded: APR 0.9.12, APR-UTIL 0.9.12 Compiled using: APR 0.9.12, APR-UTIL 0.9.12 Architecture: 32-bit Is there a way to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apr module

2007-10-04 Thread Melanie Pfefer
can some1 please shed a light on this? my current apache so files has libapr-0.so.0 so I installed apr-1.2.2 module on my solaris box. what do i need to do on apache to have the new apr .so file appears when I do "ldd httpd"? thx --- Melanie Pfefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > alright thanks. But

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apr module

2007-10-04 Thread Melanie Pfefer
alright thanks. But why the version of my apr is 0.so.0? should I add an option in configure command? thx again! --- "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Melanie Pfefer wrote: > > hi again, > > > > I am using apache 2.0.59 and noticed that apr > version > > is libapr-0.so.0. > >

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apr module

2007-10-03 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Melanie Pfefer wrote: > hi again, > > I am using apache 2.0.59 and noticed that apr version > is libapr-0.so.0. apr != httpd. APR 0.9.x was used for Apache 2.0. APR 1.2.x (and later 1.x versions) are used for Apache 2.2. - T

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apr module

2007-10-03 Thread Melanie Pfefer
hi again, I am using apache 2.0.59 and noticed that apr version is libapr-0.so.0. is it normal to have this version? shoudn't be 2.0.59? thx ___ Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it now. http:/

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apr-util-1.2.8

2007-05-20 Thread Sander Temme
On May 20, 2007, at 1:59 PM, Christopher S Arnold wrote: Hello! Not sure if this is the right list to ask this question but i did not see one for apr-util. Forgive me if this is not the right list. Forgiven, but I don't think we can be of much help over here. I am trying to install svn on

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apr-util-1.2.8

2007-05-20 Thread Christopher S Arnold
Hello! Not sure if this is the right list to ask this question but i did not see one for apr-util. Forgive me if this is not the right list. I am trying to install svn on my SLES10 box and have placed apr-util-1.2.8 in the svn directory and run configure --with-apr-util-1.2.8/configure and get t

[EMAIL PROTECTED] APR

2007-03-20 Thread Robin-David Hammond
Im trying to get svn compiled with the mod_dav_svn for httpd 2.2.4. what is odd is that svn expects APR higher than the latest version of httpd ships with. Anyone tried this before? corona /usr/local/src/svn/1.4.3 !# ./configure --with-apache=/usr/local/src/httpd/2.2.4/ configure: Configuri

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apr-config

2006-08-31 Thread Riemer Palstra
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 10:00:40PM +0100, David Link wrote: > I have installed Apache 2.2.3 on a RedHat Linux Enterprise 4ES system > and am trying to install mod_perl 2. The installation of mod_perl > insists on apr-config being somewhere on the system but the install of > Apache 2.2.3 does not se

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apr-config

2006-08-25 Thread David Link
Hi I have installed Apache 2.2.3 on a RedHat Linux Enterprise 4ES system and am trying to install mod_perl 2. The installation of mod_perl insists on apr-config being somewhere on the system but the install of Apache 2.2.3 does not seem to have installed a new apr-config (I cannot find it in /usr/