Hi Dennis,
I can get the httpd service running if I do not load my
module(example_module)
If I comment this module then apache starts running. So the problem is
with my module only. Maybe I am missing something from the configuration
point.
Here "s = 0x1 """ and it is passing as
cmd->nam
Hi William,
Thank you for the response.
I have compiled the code with -g option.
Please find the excerpts from the code and httpd.conf file:
Code declaration:
static const command_rec example_cmds[] =
{
("SCENARIO",CallScenarioName,NULL,RSRC_CONF,"Define scenario name"),
{NULL}
};
modul
Hi Dennis,
Thank you for the response..!!
Following are the specifications:
I do not exactly understand by toolchain? Could you please elaborate more
of what information I can provide?
On the same environment, we were running apache 1.3 successfully. In this
we are using a user module(mod_
Dear All,
I have migrated a user module mod_example from 1.3 to 2.4. But when I try
to start the apache it is giving a segmentation fault and creating a core.
Installed binaries:
Apache 2.4.34
apr-1.6.5
apr-util-1.6.1
pcre-8.40
expat-2.1.0
Following is the stacktrace while debug:
t@1 (l@1) signa
We have used the same compiler for both.
My main concern is "expected signature 41503234 but saw "
What could be the reason of signature ?
This implies that no signature is generated in my case
Thanks & Regards
Ankit Singhal
Tata Consultancy Services
Mailto: singhal.an...@tcs.co
I have used the same apxs binary that is available in the installed path
of apache 2.4
/usr/local/apache2.4.34/bin/apxs
My main concern is "expected signature 41503234 but saw "
What could be the reason of signature ?
Thanks & Regards
Ankit Singhal
Tata Consultancy Services
Mail
Hi All,
Thank you Rick and William for helping me out.
As suggested I had use the apxs to build a module.
Steps as follows:
1> I have commented my module and try to start the apache and it started.
2> I took the default example file that comes with
httpd-2.4.34(httpd-2.4.34/modules/examples/mo
at least some flavor of 2.4.x, at least one
which
was released this year.
We will offer you a single hint, it wouldn't be wise to try to replicate
each and
every compilation flag to ensure compatibility when building a module.
That's
what the apxs utility script installed alongside httpd
Dear Team,
In the following error:
API module structure 'example_module' in file
/app/quartz/COMS/EAI_324/ph/http/bin/mod_example.so is garbled - expected
signature 41503230 but saw - perhaps this is not an Apache module
DSO, or was compiled for a different Apache version?
My module c
Dear Team,
I have installed and set up httpd 2.0.65 version of apache server on
Solaris 11 and is running good and fine without the mod_example.so module.
I have compiled the mod_example.so module on httpd 2.0.65 with APR 0.9.20
and APR-UTIL 0.9.19. So when I load the module, there came the pro
10 matches
Mail list logo
