It’s possible to serve static content (such as images, stylesheets, and
static pages) with httpd and dynamic pages with Tomcat – however, is it
possible for the static and dynamic pages to both have the same extension?
(e.g. .jsp, for example)
I’d like for users to type in site.com/static.jsp and
location regardless of the requesting URL, then is there
really an advantage to relative vs absolute URLs for the reason they
mentioned? Or am I missing something in all this?
Thanks.
Boyle Owen wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: lightbulb432 [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
What are relative URLs relative to? For example, if you define an error page
in .htaccess and you have relative URLs in the error page itself (although
I've heard it's better to have absolute URLs in there), are those relative
URLs resolved relative to:
a) the physical location of that error page
