So... What are you upset about? Is the server not working properly or not
serving pages properly? Is it going straight to tomcat instead of serving a
static page, or do you just want more detail in your apache logs?
John Newton
-Original Message-
From: Setya [mailto:jse...@gmail.com]
- Igor Galić [mailto:i.ga...@brainsware.org] wrote:
>
>- "john 3 newton" wrote:
>
>> Solaris 10
>> Apache version: 2.2.11 & 2.2.17 (32 &64 bit)
>>
>> We recently moved our production webserver from a sparc platform
>> (T2000
On Thursday, January 27, 2011 11:24 AM,
>Am 27.01.2011 16:34, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
>> On 22.01.11 00:53, john.3.new...@bt.com wrote:
>>>
>>> We recently moved our production webserver from a sparc platform (T2000)
>>> to an x86/64 platform (x2270-m2) and we have noticed an erratic respo
>
>random device can make a huge difference. What do you use for random data?
>/dev/random or /dev/urandom? If the rofmer, try the latter if it helps.
>--
>Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Matus -
I have actually tried both, as well as builtin. I have also var
Thanks for the suggestion, but I have KeepAlive On, and it doesn't make a
difference.
Do you have any other suggestions?
John Newton
-Original Message-
From: Devraj Mukherjee [mailto:dev...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 3:57 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us
Solaris 10
Apache version: 2.2.11 & 2.2.17 (32 &64 bit)
We recently moved our production webserver from a sparc platform (T2000) to an
x86/64 platform (x2270-m2) and we have noticed an erratic response time for
downloads of files using SSL. This seems to randomly occur with any files about
10k
