Re: [users@httpd] Strange change in behavior of web page

2024-10-15 Thread Freek de Kruijf
I analyzed it a bit further and it seems to have to do with style elements in the header (CSS) which are not in the body of a html page. In that case "default-src 'self'" is not enough, it needs to be "default-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'". -- fr.gr. Freek de Kruijf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Strange change in behavior of web page

2024-10-11 Thread Freek de Kruijf
;form- action 'self';frame-ancestors 'self'" However the errors I see are that 'self' does not allow setting style-src-attr when the source is background: #990099 or margin-bottom: 0cm; line-height: 100% Instead of 'self' I tried the name of the ser

Re: [users@httpd] Strange change in behavior of web page

2024-10-09 Thread Freek de Kruijf
Op woensdag 9 oktober 2024 17:38:55 CEST schreef Frank Gingras: > On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 11:33 AM Freek de Kruijf > > wrote: > > Op woensdag 9 oktober 2024 16:31:16 CEST schreef Frank Gingras: > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 10:15 AM Freek de Kruijf > > > >

Re: [users@httpd] Strange change in behavior of web page

2024-10-09 Thread Freek de Kruijf
Op woensdag 9 oktober 2024 16:31:16 CEST schreef Frank Gingras: > On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 10:15 AM Freek de Kruijf > > wrote: > > I made a web page years ago in which I present buttons to view a video or > > to > > download that video file. In some text explaining some

[users@httpd] Strange change in behavior of web page

2024-10-09 Thread Freek de Kruijf
index.html. I compared these files and apart from obvious differences in locations of the referenced files, they are the same. Any clues? -- fr.gr. Freek de Kruijf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apa

Re: [users@httpd] No more message

2024-04-21 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
To unsubscribe, please follow the steps outlined here: https://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 9:44 PM Dalibor Medvedović < dalibor.medvedo...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm out of discussion >

Re: [users@httpd] Reducing redirects

2024-01-25 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
You could consider creating a static table using RewriteMap: https://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/rewrite/rewritemap.html Rather than first doing http to https and www to non-www, consider adding the RewriteMap in the http- and www-vhosts that you have and redirecting to the final URL straight fro

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.5 Source Code ?

2023-11-06 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
The Apache Software Foundation hosts many projects, of which httpd is probably the best known. If you refer to that: there is no (released) Apache httpd 2.5. The latest release is 2.4.58. Source is here . On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 4:40 PM Joe

Re: [users@httpd] mod_cluster in Apache 2.4.x

2023-09-21 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
mod_cluster is open source. You can add it yourself to your Apache instance. https://www.modcluster.io/ Regards, Gillis On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 8:04 AM vicky chb wrote: > Hi all, > > Does Apache 2.4.x have mod_cluster module available? I checked > https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/ but di

Re: [users@httpd] Restart over reload

2022-08-24 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
I'm not aware of a list either, but my gut says something like: adding or removing modules, changing port numbers or ip addresses and the like, require a restart. "Regular" configuration changes, like you would do in a .htaccess, or adding/removing a VirtualHost can do with a reload.

Re: [users@httpd] mod_md questions

2022-02-27 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
It does mention it, but I agree it's not too straightforward. https://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_md.html says (emphasis mine): "If Let's Encrypt can verify the ownership of the domain, the module will retrieve the certificate and its chain, store it in the local file system (see MDStore

Re: [users@httpd] Calling htdbm from another server

2022-01-12 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
I'd probably consider using SQL/LDAP or a shared filesystem for this. Would that work? Alternatively, you could rsync between the servers, depending on how fast you want the updates to happen.

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Alternatives to SSI (server side includes)?

2020-10-04 Thread Rob De Langhe
hi Tom, I simply use (or dynamically construct) a page with iframes, in which each iframe gets loaded by a separate CGI results; this is the async way. You can trigger the loading of certain iframes when user clicks on some button in the main part of the page, then a Javascript function is

Re: [users@httpd] Allow relative paths in Directory directives?

2020-09-11 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
Hi Erik, Couldn't you do something like this? That should work just fine, if you have your vhosts in a common structure. Alternatively, you could look at DirectoryMatch and come up with something awful that matches your structure. https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/core.html#directory https

Re: [users@httpd] http-https

2020-08-11 Thread Freek de Kruijf
ing to achieve this. please assit > > > > Ejaz You can do this with a directive in the .conf file for http://newtraffic.cyberia.net.sa : Redirect permanent "/" "https://newtraffic.cyberia.net.sa/"; -- fr.gr. Freek de Kruijf --

Re: [users@httpd] Please respond so I know I'm not Spam

2020-01-31 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
Was in my spam folder, but I regularly check that. It could be due to your "NOTICE...".

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Virtual host macros and reverse proxy

2020-01-29 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
line. On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 4:05 PM Tom Browder wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 08:36 Gillis J. de Nijs > wrote: > > > > There's mod_macro that might be useful. I don't think it does > calculations, though, so you might need to do some things yourself. Maybe &

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Virtual host macros and reverse proxy

2020-01-29 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
There's mod_macro that might be useful. I don't think it does calculations, though, so you might need to do some things yourself. Maybe you could indeed generate the conf files yourself and use Include

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4 - 403 Forbidden: After Upgraded the Apache from 2.2.21 to 2.4.25 for all links

2019-12-04 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
Did you read the upgrade guide at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html ? It outlines the changes in authorization and access control. I didn't read your configurations, but this might be a good starting point to get you going. Kind regards, Gillis

Re: [users@httpd] Regex in ServerAlias

2019-07-18 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
But you can do: ServerAlias www.example.com www.example.info www.example.foo.bar

Re: [users@httpd] caching of HTML5 (MP4)

2019-06-16 Thread Norbert de Jonge
. > > > Since you do not want every file to be cached, you may want to > put the header under a condition: > > Header set Cache-Control "max-age=3600, public" > > You can put this into the virtual host configuration file or into &g

Re: [users@httpd] caching of HTML5 (MP4)

2019-06-16 Thread Norbert de Jonge
+0200, Norbert de Jonge wrote: > Hi folks, > > When I'm serving up many (huge) MP4 files via HTML5 , and want > heavy caching to keep traffic down, is the following suitable > public_html/.htaccess content? > > = > > > ExpiresActive On > Header set

[users@httpd] caching of HTML5 (MP4)

2019-06-13 Thread Norbert de Jonge
Hi folks, When I'm serving up many (huge) MP4 files via HTML5 , and want heavy caching to keep traffic down, is the following suitable public_html/.htaccess content? = ExpiresActive On Header set Expires "Mon, 27 Mar 2038 13:33:37 GMT" = Thanks! Best regards, Norbert -

Re: [users@httpd] Setting Directive ServerName in VirtualHost to the full qualified domain of the request

2019-02-28 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
The ServerName doesn't matter, since it's not used in the ProxyPass. Just make that server.de or whatever. Then create a ServerAlias *.server.de. Keep in mind that this setup allows something like a request to localhost-80.server.de which then gets proxied to localhost:80 and might serve things t

Re: [users@httpd] define variables by vhost only

2018-11-05 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
Alternatlvely, you can just put the AddHandler in the VirtualHost directly, and not bother with the .htaccess files. On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 9:43 AM Hajo Locke wrote: > Hello List, > > iam looking for a way to use define to create variables limited to > vhosts (apache 2.4). > Currently i have som

Re: [users@httpd] Is there a way to intercept all IP accesses in real time?

2018-11-01 Thread Freek de Kruijf
with the http server. The software itself is available on GitHub. I have it running on the smallest Raspberry Pi, a 1B, together with a honeypot for telnet and ssh and firewall logging. Reports go to dshield.org. My modem/ro

Re: [users@httpd] invisible server

2018-10-31 Thread Freek de Kruijf
then guess I have to set manually in the PC ) Your PC/Server normally gets the same IP address from DHCP when it restarts, so you can use that address as Destination. For a web server you need to forward the external port 80 to the internal port 80 of your PC/Server. In case you use https you

Re: [users@httpd] invisible server

2018-10-31 Thread Freek de Kruijf
o by using your browser to connect to the modem/router. Probably a menu like Advanced Settings. -- fr.gr. Freek de Kruijf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Trouble-shooting Apache 2.2 Alias

2018-10-29 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
ot;Alias" and "Directory" settings. They are also on a separate filesystem > from the server root and the DocumentRoot. Should we add something else? > > Thanks! > > Leam > > On 10/29/18 4:14 AM, Gillis J. de Nijs wrote: > > The only other thing I can t

Re: [users@httpd] Trouble-shooting Apache 2.2 Alias

2018-10-29 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
The only other thing I can think of right now is that either the config is somehow not included (but in that case the Alias probably wouldn't work either), or it is before the block, which then overrides the former. All of this is assuming that you only have two blocks in your config. Anyway,

Re: [users@httpd] Trouble-shooting Apache 2.2 Alias

2018-10-26 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
For any troubleshooting, your starting point should be the error log. It usually explains pretty well why something is forbidden. On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:52 PM Leam Hall wrote: > Following the Alias docs ( > https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_alias.html#alias) and it's not > working. D

Re: [users@httpd] IP address used by Apache reverse proxy?

2018-09-25 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
I'm starting to think you don't know what you need, and we don't understand what you want. So, drop everything you (think you) know, and start over. What are you trying to do? Not how you're trying to do it, or why, but WHAT do you want to do? WHAT components are involved? I'm thinking it's al

Re: [users@httpd] How to avoid plain password in mod_ldap

2018-09-12 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
The documentation states that you can use an executable to return the password. Since the password is read on server startup, you could make that script owned by root and give it rx permissions for root only. That should make sure no one (except root) can read your password. https://httpd.apache

Re: [users@httpd] Reverse Proxy trouble with mod_substitute

2018-09-04 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
Yes, it is. You can't rewrite something that's gzipped, so you'd have to unzip it first, or - like you did - never have it gzipped in the first place. See also http://www.apachetutor.org/admin/reverseproxies where there's a full reverse proxy scenario configured and explained. It uses the same t

Re: [users@httpd] VirtualHost and HTTPS

2018-08-30 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
Also see https://wiki.apache.org/httpd/NameBasedSSLVHosts As a rule, it is impossible to host more than one SSL virtual host on the > same IP address and port. This is because Apache needs to know the name of the host in order to > choose the correct certificate to setup the encryption layer. T

Re: [users@httpd] Problem with CGI script

2017-12-29 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
DirectoryIndex contains a list of files to try, not a full path. My guess is that it's supposed to be DirectoryIndex index.cgi instead of the path. On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 11:05 AM, mahmood n wrote: > Hi, > > > > In one the www folders, I have an index.cgi which is a python script. > Problem is

Re: [users@httpd] if statement and ssl directives (apache 2.4)

2017-12-06 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
Hi Adam, Simplest, in my opnion, is simplest to read and parse for a human. What's wrong with: ## One VirtualHost that does everything ServerName www.comptoir-hardware.com SSLEngine on SSLCertificateFile /etc/ssl/certs/comptoir-hardware.com.crt SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/ssl/pr

Re: [users@httpd] Hide URL link of target

2017-08-01 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
Hi Chris, Displaying the URL when hovering over the link or loading the site is something your browser does, and not something Apache httpd has any control over. Cheers, Gillis On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Chris Chia wrote: > Hi > > > > Very newbie question. > > > > Is there a way to hide

Re: [users@httpd] configure apache2 on ubuntu 16.04 vps to use php-fpm is not leading to the desired outcome

2017-07-25 Thread Gillis J. de Nijs
I see you have libapache2-mod-php7.0 installed. Are you sure you disabled it? In Ubuntu you can use a2dismod to disable modules. I suspect mod_php is listed there. It's not required when you want to do fpm. On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Luca Toscano wrote: > Hi Dino, > > > 2017-07-23 1:3

Re: [users@httpd] Apache log analyzer?

2017-04-29 Thread Freek de Kruijf
configuration files. -- fr.gr. Freek de Kruijf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] apache run status: how to tell as non-root user (on *nix)?

2017-02-21 Thread Rob De Langhe
the existence of the PID file only gives a hint; its contents (the PID of the process) should then be checked to see if that particular process is indeed (still) running. Citeren Rainer Canavan : On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Tom Browder wrote: I need to programatically determine whether

Re: [users@httpd] how to have multiple sub-domains on my webserver?

2016-12-26 Thread Freek de Kruijf
should i configure my webserver??? > Thank you.Rajeev With vhost files in .../vhost.d/ as many as you have domains. Read the documentation on that subject. -- fr.gr. Freek de Kruijf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr

[users@httpd] [mod_proxy] status=E has no affect.

2016-08-06 Thread dE
Hi. I'm using the following config -- BalancerMember balancer://localbalance/ http://[fc00::1:4]/ retry=600 loadfactor=99 status=E BalancerMember balancer://localbalance/ http://[fc00::1:6]/ retry=600 ProxyPass / balancer://localbalance/ forcerecovery=off The member fc00::1:4 is manually set

Re: [users@httpd] mod_proxy: failonstatus does not work.

2016-08-05 Thread dE
Thanks for the info! I'll be waiting. On 08/03/16 20:08, Yann Ylavic wrote: Hi, On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 9:28 AM, dE wrote: ProxyPass / balancer://localbalance/ failonstatus=200 forcerecovery=off BalancerMember balancer://localbalance/ http://[fc00::1:4]/ retry=600 loadfact

[users@httpd] mod_proxy: failonstatus does not work.

2016-07-31 Thread dE
Hi. I've set the following configs -- ProxyPass / balancer://localbalance/ failonstatus=200 forcerecovery=off BalancerMember balancer://localbalance/ http://[fc00::1:4]/ retry=600 loadfactor=99 BalancerMember balancer://localbalance/ http://[fc00::1:6]/ retry=600 Both the backends send a

Re: [users@httpd] mod_proxy: When does a backend be considered as failed?

2016-07-31 Thread dE
On 07/30/2016 04:37 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 8:36 AM, dE wrote: Yes, as you said I did try that before -- Your previous configuration had timeout=10 on the ProxyPass line, not the BalancerMember one as expected. BalancerMember balancer://localbalance/ http://[fc00::1:4

Re: [users@httpd] mod_proxy: When does a backend be considered as failed?

2016-07-29 Thread dE
On 07/25/16 17:47, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 5:18 AM, dE wrote: Config -- [] ProxyPass / balancer://localbalance/ failontimeout=on timeout=10 failonstatus=502 You are defining a balancer here, so the timeout= parameter relates to the balancer (like the two others) However

Re: [users@httpd] mod_proxy: When does a backend be considered as failed?

2016-07-24 Thread dE
On 07/19/16 17:54, Yann Ylavic wrote: Hello, On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 9:41 AM, dE wrote: It appears that mod_proxy considers a backend as failed only when the transport layer connection to that backend fails. Is this expected? Unless failonstatus/failontimeout is used, usually. Which

[users@httpd] Re: mod_proxy: When does a backend be considered as failed?

2016-07-19 Thread dE
Looks like this module is deprecated. On 07/17/16 13:11, dE wrote: Hi, It appears that mod_proxy considers a backend as failed only when the transport layer connection to that backend fails. Is this expected? The backends are VMs and only when I SIGSTOP the VMs, the backend is

[users@httpd] mod_proxy: When does a backend be considered as failed?

2016-07-17 Thread dE
Hi, It appears that mod_proxy considers a backend as failed only when the transport layer connection to that backend fails. Is this expected? The backends are VMs and only when I SIGSTOP the VMs, the backend is considered in an error state and the retry= parameter has an affect. If I've

Re: [users@httpd] mod_proxy nofailover parameter.

2016-07-16 Thread dE
I'll come back to this later. On 07/15/16 22:25, Daniel wrote: Failover is what you described, nofailover is for the opposite El 15 jul. 2016 3:27 p. m., "dE" <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> escribió: Hi, What I understand of nofailover is that in case

[users@httpd] mod_proxy nofailover parameter.

2016-07-15 Thread dE
Hi, What I understand of nofailover is that in case a client is fetching from this proxy and the origin server goes to an error or disabled state, a reset packet won't be sent to the client, instead the backend will be changed and the client will continue the operation uninterrupted. Bu

[users@httpd] mod_proxy's ping= parameter.

2016-07-15 Thread dE
Hi, I was wondering about the ping worker parameter. It intends to looks as if the ping fails (timeout), the request must not be sent to the server. I've set the following ProxyPass -- ProxyPass / http://[fc00::1:4]/ ping=10 I've SIGSTOPed the apache process on the backend server, so I

[users@httpd] mod_ext_filter with Mono problem

2016-04-13 Thread Tero Armando De La Rosa
Hello, I'm trying to create a simple Mono program that is configured as an external filter that simply reads from stdin and writes to stdout a modified version of a media file (images, videos...). Prior to reading from stdin I'm trying to craft a POC which simply replaces all requests' conten

[users@httpd] How to force browsers doesn't use cache

2015-11-16 Thread Ronaldo Luiz de Carvalho
Hi all, I need to force my site users to use the last version of the site php pages. Some site users are getting information from their browsers cache. There are a way to setting apache in a way to force the users site browsers doesn't use their cache? On all site access the page co

Re: [users@httpd] Re: 2 web servers in load balancing

2015-03-18 Thread Alfredo De Luca
Thanks James. Really appreciated. I am talking to an mySQL expert now for the best options for what we want to achieve. Thanks again On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Dr James Smith wrote: > On 17/03/2015 07:59, Alfredo De Luca wrote: > > Hi all. > Any clue on this? > On 15/

[users@httpd] Re: 2 web servers in load balancing

2015-03-17 Thread Alfredo De Luca
Hi all. Any clue on this? On 15/03/2015 9:30 PM, "Alfredo De Luca" wrote: > Hi all. > I ve never done this before so I am asking best practice/info/docs of > how to have 2 apache web servers in load balancing. > > - Which httpd module do I have to load in the http conf?

[users@httpd] 2 web servers in load balancing

2015-03-15 Thread Alfredo De Luca
Hi all. I ve never done this before so I am asking best practice/info/docs of how to have 2 apache web servers in load balancing. - Which httpd module do I have to load in the http conf? - I was reading that I have to have a web load balancer on top of them? Is it necessary? Can they accept reques

Re: [users@httpd] Virtual Hosting: One website doesn't work.

2015-01-04 Thread Freek de Kruijf
st. When testing different virtual named hosts on the same system I define these names, like example.com, www.example.com, etc. in /etc/hosts pointing to 127.0.0.1. You can always use the reconnect icon of the web browser to get a fresh version of the page you are accessing. Never had any probl

Fwd: [users@httpd] Compiling HTTPD from Source

2014-10-27 Thread Rob De Langhe
Personally, I just compile the entire suite from source code, including the compiler (GCC) itself, openSSL, anything related to what my web server might need. All dependencies and the correct versions of the different software packages are stored in a rather bulky (but simple) Makefile. Once you h

Re: [users@httpd] authorization (beginner)

2014-10-14 Thread dE
On 10/14/14 01:29, Patton, Billy wrote: I’m upgrading an app and have copied it from a production server to my macbook pro. On the production server when going to the site, it requires a login. On my mac It doesn’t and it also doesn’t get very far because it has no user in the system. Here’s th

[users@httpd] Re: Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-13 Thread dE
On 10/06/14 21:21, dE wrote: Hi. I'm in a situation where I got 3 certificates server.pem -- the end user certificate which's sent by the server to the client. intermediate.pem -- server.pem is signed by intermediate.pem's private key. issuer.pem -- intermediate.p

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-10 Thread dE
On 10/10/14 19:00, Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 dE, On 10/10/14 6:30 AM, dE wrote: On 10/09/14 23:47, Christopher Schultz wrote: De, On 10/7/14 11:27 PM, dE wrote: $ openssl x509 -noout -in server.pem -text Certificate: Data: Version: 1 (0x0

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-10 Thread dE
On 10/09/14 23:47, Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 De, On 10/7/14 11:27 PM, dE wrote: $ openssl x509 -noout -in server.pem -text Certificate: Data: Version: 1 (0x0) Serial Number: 13192573755114198537 (0xb7156feedab91609) Signature Algorithm

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-08 Thread dE
On 10/09/14 03:29, Igor Cicimov wrote: On 09/10/2014 3:46 AM, "dE" <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 10/08/14 21:36, Eric Covener wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:00 PM, dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-08 Thread dE
On 10/08/14 21:36, Eric Covener wrote: On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:00 PM, dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: intermediate.pem must get installed automatically in the browsers (at least in FF), but instead these browsers don't see the certificate. ​No, servers a

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-08 Thread dE
On 10/08/14 17:53, Igor Cicimov wrote: On 08/10/2014 9:16 PM, "dE" <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 10/08/14 14:33, Igor Cicimov wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:03 PM, dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: &

Re: [users@httpd] Intended use of SSLCACertificateFile/SSLCACertificatePath

2014-10-08 Thread dE
On 10/08/14 16:53, Eric Covener wrote: On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:46 AM, dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: Are all SSLCA* directives used for the same purpose (where client sends the public key for it's authentication)? ​No.​ Thanks for clarifying that.

[users@httpd] Intended use of SSLCACertificateFile/SSLCACertificatePath

2014-10-08 Thread dE
In Apache 2.2, these can be used instead of SSLCertificateChainFile, but from it's documentation and mentioning of "clients", it looks like this's intended to be used in a situation where the client sends the server certificates for it's own authentication. This's what I get from -- "These are

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-08 Thread dE
On 10/08/14 14:33, Igor Cicimov wrote: On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:03 PM, dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 10/08/14 10:18, Igor Cicimov wrote: On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 2:27 PM, dE mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 10/08/14 05:18, Igor Cicimov wrot

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-08 Thread dE
On 10/08/14 14:35, Igor Cicimov wrote: On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:05 PM, dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 10/08/14 10:19, Igor Cicimov wrote: You can find more about openssl tool set here: https://www.openssl.org/docs/apps/s_client.html, its perfect

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-08 Thread dE
On 10/08/14 10:19, Igor Cicimov wrote: You can find more about openssl tool set here: https://www.openssl.org/docs/apps/s_client.html, its perfect for ssl troubleshooting. By the way, did you import the CA_chain.pem in the browsers? I thought browser only needs to have the self

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-08 Thread dE
On 10/08/14 10:18, Igor Cicimov wrote: On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 2:27 PM, dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 10/08/14 05:18, Igor Cicimov wrote: On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 1:59 AM, dE mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 10/07/14 18:12, Igor Cicimov wrote

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-07 Thread dE
On 10/08/14 05:18, Igor Cicimov wrote: On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 1:59 AM, dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 10/07/14 18:12, Igor Cicimov wrote: On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:51 AM, dE mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi. I'm in a sit

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-07 Thread dE
On 10/07/14 22:42, Daniel wrote: SSLCertificateChainFile is deprecated in 2.4 in favour of SSLCaCertificateFile 2014-10-07 16:59 GMT+02:00 dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>>: On 10/07/14 18:12, Igor Cicimov wrote: On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:51 AM, dE mailto:de.tec...@gmail.co

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-07 Thread dE
On 10/07/14 18:12, Igor Cicimov wrote: On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:51 AM, dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi. I'm in a situation where I got 3 certificates server.pem -- the end user certificate which's sent by the server to the client.

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-07 Thread dE
orked around it with the method I mention before. Until someone can tell you what may really be happening this may be worth a try for you. Good luck. 2014-10-06 17:51 GMT+02:00 dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>>: Hi. I'm in a situation where I got 3 certificates server.

[users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-06 Thread dE
Hi. I'm in a situation where I got 3 certificates server.pem -- the end user certificate which's sent by the server to the client. intermediate.pem -- server.pem is signed by intermediate.pem's private key. issuer.pem -- intermediate.pem is signed by issuer.pem's private key. combined.pem is

[users@httpd] Re: Require all denied allows everyone access.

2014-09-22 Thread dE
On 09/23/14 08:47, dE wrote: I've the following in a directory section -- AuthType none Require all denied But Apache denies nothing. Anyone is able to open the location and read files in it. Ok, my bad, the path of the was not co

[users@httpd] Require all denied allows everyone access.

2014-09-22 Thread dE
I've the following in a directory section -- AuthType none Require all denied But Apache denies nothing. Anyone is able to open the location and read files in it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@ht

[users@httpd] Apache without authz_core_module

2014-09-21 Thread dE
Hi. I'm experimenting with Apache authentication. It's very clear that without any authentication provider/directive the default is the fail the authorization, this can be seen in the error logs. However is the same true for authorization? If there's no authorization definition, then access

[users@httpd] Re: ServerLimit:What do you mean by "lifetime of the Apache httpd process"

2014-09-10 Thread dE
On 09/11/14 10:23, dE wrote: On 09/10/14 22:08, dE wrote: Do values of other directives change periodically, and for this one it remains constant? Sorry, but this can be seen here. http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/mpm_common.html#serverlimit Anyway, I got this one

[users@httpd] Re: ServerLimit:What do you mean by "lifetime of the Apache httpd process"

2014-09-10 Thread dE
On 09/10/14 22:08, dE wrote: Do values of other directives change periodically, and for this one it remains constant? Sorry, but this can be seen here. http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/mpm_common.html#serverlimit - To

[users@httpd] ServerLimit:What do you mean by "lifetime of the Apache httpd process"

2014-09-10 Thread dE
Do values of other directives change periodically, and for this one it remains constant? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] event MPM:multiple clients per thread.

2014-09-10 Thread dE
On 09/10/14 16:57, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:13 AM, dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi! I was configuring the MPM modules. As per my understanding, the event module can handle more than one client per thread; since session which are in a k

[users@httpd] event MPM:multiple clients per thread.

2014-09-10 Thread dE
Hi! I was configuring the MPM modules. As per my understanding, the event module can handle more than one client per thread; since session which are in a keep alive state will be managed by a common thread freeing up the thread to handle other clients. So, no. of threads per process is effec

Re: [users@httpd] Understanding Apache Mutex directive.

2014-09-07 Thread dE
On 09/04/14 21:55, Mike Rumph wrote: Hi. I was reading this -- http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/core.html#mutex Before we continue, I would like to clarify another doubt that I have. There's a 'mutex mechanism' and then there's a 'mutex name'. What's the difference? The 'mutex

Re: [users@httpd] Understanding Apache Mutex directive.

2014-09-04 Thread dE
On 09/03/14 22:26, Mike Rumph wrote: Hello dE, I can only give you my own interpretation of this document. First of all the Mutex directive in Apache httpd 2.4.x replaces several different directives from Apache httpd 2.2.x. The SVN commit for this is 883540. - http://svn.apache.org/viewvc

[users@httpd] Understanding Apache Mutex directive.

2014-09-02 Thread dE
Hi. I was reading this -- http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/core.html#mutex Quoting what's written here -- Specify |default| as the first argument to change the settings for all mutexes As we know mutex is a mechanism; it appears Apache has settings for each mutex it implements. specif

[users@httpd] Apache 2.4 optimisation for a virtual server with low resources.

2014-08-11 Thread Robin de Haan
Hi, I'm a web designer setting up a server for the first time using a very light Linode package with 1GB RAM and 1 CPU. It will host a Drupal site that gets low traffic. It's running Ubuntu 14.04 and Apache 2.4.7. I'm following their set up guide here: https://www.linode.com/docs/websites/hosting

Re: [users@httpd] Different question

2014-07-16 Thread Freek de Kruijf
I have > managed to download the httpd-2.4.9 from apaches website in addition to > downloading the APR file. It is better to use Apache from the Ubuntu distribution. -- fr.gr. Freek de Kruijf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-

[users@httpd] R: Re: [users@httpd] mod_rewrite RewriteCond

2014-06-27 Thread Michele De Santis
Thanks Pete, I was using mod_rewrite in block. Apache works like a reverse-proxy. Is there a way to insert more IP? Thanks for your advise. Michael Messaggio originale Da: p...@openstrike.co.uk Data: 27-giu-2014 11.55 A: , "Michele De Santis" Ogg: Re: [users@httpd] m

[users@httpd] mod_rewrite RewriteCond

2014-06-27 Thread Michele De Santis
Hi to all, I'm working with apache 2.2.3-22 and I want to allow access a certain IP address. These IP are consecutive x.x.x.232 x.x.x.233 in my httpd.conf I'm using RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} !x\.x\.x\.23[23]$ [NC]RewriteRule \.*$ - [F,NC] or RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} !x\.x\.x\.23[2-3]$ [NC]R

[users@httpd] [SOLVED] [users@httpd] - customize .htaccess

2014-06-18 Thread Paolo De Michele
On 17/06/14 20:19, Rich Bowen wrote: > > On 06/16/2014 04:13 PM, Paolo De Michele wrote: >> hi guys, >> >> I would like to customize .htaccess >> my scenario should be: >> >> - domain.com >> - sub.domain.com >> - sub2.domain.com >> &g

Re: [users@httpd] - customize .htaccess

2014-06-17 Thread Paolo De Michele
any idea? someone has tried that before? let me know, thank you in advance On 17/06/14 07:56, Cain Dickens wrote: > > you can try to make use of virtualhost , each domain has its solely > directory and make than dir as its root DIR . > > Cain > > 2014-6-17 上午5:14于 "Pao

[users@httpd] - customize .htaccess

2014-06-16 Thread Paolo De Michele
hi guys, I would like to customize .htaccess my scenario should be: - domain.com - sub.domain.com - sub2.domain.com for istances, my root directory is /var/www/domain/ into this would to insert about 2 new directories, called sub and sub2 when a guest will digit sub.domain.com or sub2.domain.co

Re: [users@httpd] [SOLVED] httpd basic authentication

2014-03-30 Thread Paolo De Michele
On 03/26/2014 05:50 PM, James Moe wrote: > On 03/25/2014 04:44 PM, Paolo De Michele wrote: > > > I configured a basic httpd authentication via apache2. Look below: > > Is the entry point into the > restricted area? Thanks for your advices I solved the situation The correc

Re: [users@httpd] httpd basic authentication

2014-03-26 Thread Paolo De Michele
On 03/26/2014 05:19 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >> but doesn't work > You'll have to elaborate for meaningful help. Sorry? What could be the problem? I didn't understand because in "theory" should be easy > > - > To unsubscribe, e-m

Re: [users@httpd] httpd basic authentication

2014-03-26 Thread Paolo De Michele
sswd -bc /etc/phpmyadmin/htpasswd.setup test test and in console I saw: Adding password for user test next step, service apache2 restart but doesn't work > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:14 AM, Paolo De Michele > mailto:pa...@paolodemichele.it>> wrote: > > Hi everybody,

[users@httpd] httpd basic authentication

2014-03-25 Thread Paolo De Michele
Hi everybody, I configured a basic httpd authentication via apache2. Look below: AuthType Basic AuthName "phpMyAdmin Setup" AuthUserFile /etc/phpmyadmin/htpasswd.setup Require valid-user So, I rebooted apache2 but the authentication doesn't work Where is the problem?

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >