Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_Proxy and 100-Continue

2008-09-30 Thread Tom Wells
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's section 8.2.3 of RFC2616. But anyway, I don't see why > use the early keyword. As mentioned earlier, I'm not actually using mod_headers or the early keyword at all, I was using it to demonstrate the issue with mod_prox

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_Proxy and 100-Continue

2008-09-30 Thread Tom Wells
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:50:00 -0400 > "Tom Wells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The "early" keyword exists to help developers simulate > a request, for example when debug

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_Proxy and 100-Continue

2008-09-30 Thread Tom Wells
Hi Group I'm fairly confident I've found a bug in mod_proxy in Apache 2.2.9 but would like your opinion before I log anything to the bug tracker. It's something I discovered while working in mod_python, but I've managed to get it occurring with a bare-bones Apache 2.2.9 setup using only mod_proxy