> So i finally got apache2-devel installed... However, when running
./configure for mod_proxy_msrpc, i get an error due to the absence of
ap_socache.h. It appears this file is included n apache 2.4. Now, will
mod_proxy_msrpc only work in apache 2.4? If not, can i just get the
ap_socache.h file
Chris, if you encounter any issues with mod_proxy_msrpc please report them
at https://github.com/bombadil/mod_proxy_msrpc/issues. Note that OAB, OWA,
Autodiscover, ActiveSync, etc. all use "normal" HTTP/S (and not MSRPC like
OA) so they should work without mod_proxy_msrpc. There is an open issue
wi
there any syntax error or something. Does this
> rewrite part be inside <*VirtualHost *:3030*> ... <*/VirtualHost*>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Thomas Eckert <
> thomas.r.w.eck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm confused as to what your setup
request like this *http://domain_name <http://domain_name>* redirects
> to *http://domain_name:3030 <http://domain_name:3030>*
>
> Also tries "Redirect"
> *Redirect :3030 http://domain_name <http://domain_name>*
>
> rewrite_module is enabled.
>
> Is t
If you use httpd as reverse proxy then clients will perform SSL handshakes
with your reverse proxy. In SSL there is no distinction between decrypting
the HTTP headers only or decrypting the full HTTP request - it's simply
"payload" and it will be decrypted as a whole. If you want to understand
how
Assuming you have a working config for a server/vhost on domain_name:3030,
then how about
Redirect permanent / http://domain_name:3000/
? See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_alias.html#redirect and
friends.
"Restricted" access is a bit vague but
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/
Can you post the headers, from sending the request(s) up to and including
the response(s) ?
I think you might be hitting the same spot as I recently did in (1). In
short, most (if not all) popular clients do not unpack responses if they
think they shouldn't even if the headers tell them to. So for
> The question is: from the proxy performance/scalability point of view is
it better to configure backends (origin servers) with http or with https?
"Better" depends on what you want to achieve. Do you want to securely
deliver simple html content with no fancy stuff ? Do you want to have
authentic
Using form based auth, e.g.
AuthName "forms_foo"
AuthFormProvider my_provider
AuthType form
AuthFormLoginRequiredLocation "/foo_form"
Session On
SessionCookieName foo_cookie path=/foo/;httponly
SessionCryptoPassphrase somereallyneatandnicepassphrase
SessionCookieRe
stall 2.4.x dev ?
>
> Regards,
> Abdul
>
> On 12/16/2013 2:48 PM, Thomas Eckert wrote:
>
> Did you make sure to have the -dev package(s) installed ?
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Abdul Anshad wrote:
>
>> I have made sure that the --with-ssl point
Did you make sure to have the -dev package(s) installed ?
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Abdul Anshad wrote:
> I have made sure that the --with-ssl points to the 1.0.1e, FYI i also
> have another system binary installed which is openssl-0.9.7d.
>
> I have included the source of apr and apr-
I've tried something simliar but didn't get it working. I would be
interested in how your attempts on automatic-form-filling-in worked out -
and if they did also in the "how" ;-)
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:48 AM, iridium1191 wrote:
> Hi Apache users,
>
> I'm running Apache 2.2.22 on Ubuntu ser
Ideas, anyone ?
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Thomas Eckert
wrote:
> Trying to figure out how to unset encrypted cookies for which the
> encryption key was changed. Docs at
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_session_crypto.html
>
> say
>
> "If
Using mod_auth_form, when a user tries to access a URL and is 'interrupted'
by the form based login, how do I pass on the original URL to the form html
or to the AuthFormLoginSuccessLocation directive, so I can redirect the
client - upon successful login - to the URL where she wanted to go to.
At
Trying to figure out how to unset encrypted cookies for which the
encryption key was changed. Docs at
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_session_crypto.html
say
"If the encryption key is changed, sessions will be invalidated
automatically."
but using a config like
AuthName
Try setting the proxy-initial-not-pooled flag with mod_proxy_http, see
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_proxy_http.html
Apache 2.4 has an issue with the HTTP keep-alive time out which happens
quite frequently with ActiveSync. There is an ongoing discussion
("mod_proxy, oooled backend c
Using a config like this
BalancerMember http://backend.example.local status=-SE
ServerName frontend.example.local
SSLProxyEngine On
RequestHeader set X-Forwarded-Proto http
ProxyPass !
ProxyPassReverse !
I'm looking for the erorr in this config :
KeepAlive OnServerName server1.domain1.localServerAdmin
me@domain1.localListen 10.10.10.10:80 http
BalancerMember http://server1.domain2.local
status=-SE
ServerName secured.domain1.local
SSLProxyEngine On
RequestHeader set
This is interesting. I'm seeing similar events at one of my reverse proxy.
After fixing a DNS infrastructure problem I started seeing lots of 304s
with processing times well above 5 seconds. For header-only requests that's
a lot of time. If there is any news here please let us know. At the very
lea
In a simple reverse proxy setup, such as
BalancerMember http://mydomain.org
status=-SE
ServerName secure.mydomain.local
SSLProxyEngine On
RequestHeader set X-Forwarded-Proto http
ProxyPass balancer://cd107d9706d71153bafd4ab15f1c6b5d/
lbme
Is the directive
SSLStrictSNIVHostCheck On
meant to block connections to a virtual host if the connecting client
uses an IP literal as URL ? RFC 6066 states that
Literal IPv4 and IPv6 addresses are not permitted in "HostName".
since a SNI doesn't make sense at all for an IP literal and
On 11/16/2012 05:12 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:31:38 +0100
Thomas Eckert wrote:
Thanks for the hint but unfortunately "manually" adding xml2enc to the
filtering chain does not help.
Looks like you've got problems over and above anything to do with
you
On 11/14/2012 06:12 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On 14 Nov 2012, at 15:53, Thomas Eckert wrote:
Is there a way to work around this ? I do want the call to mod_xml2enc to
happen but I also want the reverse proxy to support content compression.
That's a lot of correct analysis.
The output chai
Hi folks
I'm using apache (2.4.3) as reverse proxy with mod_proxy_html (as
delivered with 2.4.3) and encountered an issue using HTML rewriting in
combination with content compression, as with the "Accept-Encoding" and
"Content-Encoding" HTTP headers.
This issue has been encountered by numero
24 matches
Mail list logo
