Thanks for your analysis Yann, i'll stay tuned on the dev mailing list.
See you.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Sylvain Goulmy wrote:
> >
> > No i don't use that directive, here is the extract of the running
&
31, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Sylvain Goulmy
> wrote:
> > Hi Yann,
> >
> > Two children processes.
>
> Did you configure ListenCoresBucketsRatio?
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@htt
Hi Yann,
Two children processes.
And on the status page i can see :
1 requests currently being processed, 99 idle workers
Regards.
Sylvain
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Sylvain Goulmy
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm
Hi all,
I'm currently using apache 2.4.17 on RHEL with the worker mode configured
this way :
- ThreadLimit : 200
- ServerLimit : 50
- ThreadsPerChild : 50
- MaxRequestWorkers : 150
- MinSpareThreads : 10
- MaxSpareThreads : 80
- MaxConnectionsPerChild : 0
- StartServers : 1
With this configurati
>
> Bear in mind that you only know which virtual host is requested
> when you read the Host: header, which is after you already
> accepted the connection.
> There are third-party modules for managing loads and protecting
> a server from attack. Some of them might be worth a look.
I get your poi
I have made many investigations but i haven't found such third party
modules for Apache 2.4. And sometimes when i find a part of code that could
do the job, it seems so confidential that it is difficult to know if you
can fully trust the implementation and consider sending it on LE.
There are ofte
Thank you for your feedback.
But do you protect your platform then without such a functionality ?
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> - Can you confirm that Apache does not provide any mecanism allowing to
>> limit the number of connection per virtual host, just to be sure th
Hi all,
I'm using Apache 2.2 on LE for several years now and i use intensively the
virtual host mechanism (300 virtual hosts per http instance).
As soon as you start sharing resources between applications, you want to
protect your platform and prevent an application from taking all the
threads an
Hi all,
Since i migrate from Apache 2.2.22 to 2.4.10 i have the following warning
when i launch Apache :
[core:warn] [pid 26605:tid 140610782807808] AH00111: Config variable
${B2C_DOMAIN} is not defined
This variable is set using a rewrite rule :
ProxyPassInterpolateEnv On
RewriteCond %
> I would recommend using mod_macro to help out with your migration;
> you could create a macro Vhost definition...
>
> > On Dec 19, 2014, at 10:49 AM, Sylvain Goulmy wrote:
> >
> > Yann,
> >
> > I did some additionnal tests with the BalancerInherit directive. If
of my balancer states via a single URL.
So before considering this option, as far as you know, do you think there
is definitely no other options available.
Regards.
Sylvain
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> Hi Sylvain,
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:04 AM
I also forgot to mention that i have set the BalancerInherit to Off before
loading the balancers definition. It unfortunatly doesn't change the
behaviour.
Sylvain
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Sylvain Goulmy wrote:
>
> Hi Yann,
>
> Thank you for your feedback.
>
&
ive for shared
> memories, this can't be changed by httpd's configuration (as far as I
> know).
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Sylvain Goulmy
> wrote:
> >
> > I also noticed that a single proxy_balancer creates almost 350 shm on the
> > system.
>
I'm currently working on a migration from Apache 2.2 to 2.4 (2.4.10). I'm
facing an issue with the usage of proxy_balancer with Apache 2.4. They now
require the mod_slotmem_shm.so module to work correctly.
I have added this module but i noticed that a single proxy_balancer now
creates many memory
14 matches
Mail list logo